If you watched the games you can't possibly say that with a straight face.
I’m exaggerating for effect a bit. There is nothing that has happened at Iowa to suggest he is great coach to jackasses on a message board like you and me.
I did watch all the games. Iowa’s line was good. Not one of the best under Ferentz, but good. Maybe it was a Herculean coaching effort that got them to that point? Maybe they were so unbelievably talented, only Barnett could coach them down to make them just a goodish line?
IMO, I think they played at or above their talent level. So yeah, I think they were probably well coached, but they have warts.
You look like a great coach when your bookends are Tristan Wirfs and Aleric Jackson. Barnett didn’t have those guys. I have yet to hear anyone I would consider qualified suggest Barnett is anything other than a good coach at worst.
Copeland looked like a good coach when he had ISM and Smith. Then he was trash a few years later. I think it had a lot more to do with Brian, and the talent. While not even good, the receivers were better this year with Budmayr than under Copeland last year.
Like everyone else on this board, I bet you don’t think Budmayr had nothing to do with the improvement? Am I right?
I think he had better players and a different scheme, but the fvck if I know? Maybe it was Budmayr? I am at least smart enough to realize him being the connection to Deacon Hill has absolutely nothing to do with his ability to coach. I feel like a unicorn in that observation.
Anyway. The line was as good or better than I’d hoped this year. Maybe my expectations were too low, but I was pleased with their play. Kaleb Johnson didn’t go from co-starter one year, to one of the all-time greats the next season because the line was trash.