Probably, but not always. Sometimes italics are used as a point of emphasis.So, I will state it for the 100th time, go ahead and look at the comment, ever wonder why that was placed in italics? Probably because it is meant to be sarcastic.
I say sign him up.Hank started vs New Mexico on Sep 14. He was 17/25 (68%) for 235 yards and 4 TD passes.
His highlights from that game:
Ferentz will neuter him in a hurry.I say sign him up.
Looks like some good potential and a pretty lively arm.
Almost looks capable. A far cry from what we have seen recently in the QB room
We should just stop having QBs, right?Ferentz will neuter him in a hurry.
...and I believe I read he had 3 picks against Arkansas in something like 15 pass attempts.
He had a very bad game against Arkansas....and I believe I read he had 3 picks against Arkansas in something like 15 pass attempts.
Also, the Arkansas GameHank started vs New Mexico on Sep 14. He was 17/25 (68%) for 235 yards and 4 TD passes.
His highlights from that game:
Let's hope TL has free reign over the QB room going forward.Ferentz will neuter him in a hurry.
Sounds like b.s.Ferentz will neuter him in a hurry.
As was Jon Beutjer
When I was living at the Quad my first year of school at Iowa, the day after he announced he was transferring to Illinois, some guy on my floor made a poster of Beutjer in an Illini jersey getting pile drived by Matt Roth with the caption, "The Future Beutjer", and pasted it on his door. An early meme example. /CSBBeutjer the future! Sam Aiello did everyone a solid on that one.
Increasing football scholarships would throw off the Title IX balance. I’m pretty sure if a school/conference did that they would have to add 20 scholarships for women too.I knew all this. Still don't understand a school like Iowa not giving out 105 scholarships in football.
Or they could drop more scholarships in men's non-revenue to offset.Increasing football scholarships would throw off the Title IX balance. I’m pretty sure if a school/conference did that they would have to add 20 scholarships for women too.
Again...can we be more logical about this. The whole world knows football makes money. Exempt it from title 9Increasing football scholarships would throw off the Title IX balance. I’m pretty sure if a school/conference did that they would have to add 20 scholarships for women too.
Correct, and this is the more likely scenario IMO. Also for the people in the thread talking about partial schollys, football and basketball are not allowed to give partial rides.Or they could drop more scholarships in men's non-revenue to offset.
I couldn’t disagree more. Title IX is about equal opportunity, not money. If you exempt football it’s just a matter of time until men’s basketball is exempted and pretty soon Title IX is meaningless.Again...can we be more logical about this. The whole world knows football makes money. Exempt it from title 9
you can have the teams, they don't have to be scholarship supported though. Football players risk way more serious injury and bring in, well it's not even close in terms of dollars. Leave the traditional olympic sports under title IX, but to count football to me...is a joke. Title IX has done some good things, but it's killed some good things too.I couldn’t disagree more. Title IX is about equal opportunity, not money. If you exempt football it’s just a matter of time until men’s basketball is exempted and pretty soon Title IX is meaningless.
They are now according to this.Correct, and this is the more likely scenario IMO. Also for the people in the thread talking about partial schollys, football and basketball are not allowed to give partial rides.
You are not alone. I absolutely believe a healthy Brendan Sullivan, working from now until mighty Albany shows up in Iowa City, could be an outstanding Iowa QB. As soon as Sully took over, KJ and the entire offense took on a whole new, more effective look. Lester, as the HC at Western Michigan, recruited Sullivan. There's a history there, and I think Sully could thrive under Lester's guidance. But Iowa does need additional bodies and talent, because we know injuries happen.Maybe I’m alone, but I think B. Sullivan as our starter next year is a good option. Any QB ready to beat Sully in an open competition is going to be very expensive. I’d rather that money go towards getting a WR, LT, or bolstering the defense.
So someone like Hank Brown makes sense to me. Brown can add depth next year and have a legitimate chance to start once Sullivan graduates.
Can you explain this? My understanding is that the university is reimbursed for scholarships. Is that correct? What else do they pay the university for?The athletic department owes over 200 million to the university, record profits last year netted them a surplus of 11.4 million. Add to the point where revenue sharing becomes a thing, this is far from a nothing burger.
I say sign him up.
Looks like some good potential and a pretty lively arm.
Almost looks capable. A far cry from what we have seen recently in the QB room
What history do you know?Let's hope TL has free reign over the QB room going forward.
I'm skeptical of course as we know the history.
The Kirk haters think that if they say stuff like this often enough it becomes true or.... they may just be the dumbasses they sound like.What history do you know?
Wanna bet?Under the new 105 rule, every student athlete on the roster gets a schollie
Truth be told
He’s probably the only “Name” QB in the portal we can afford.
He grew up in Wheaton, Illinois. Not much different than Iowa City.Bro had better enjoy the cold weather.
I'm aware, he has been playing in the SEC, totally different.He grew up in Wheaton, Illinois. Not much different than Iowa City.