You should have kept watching, he has more to say on the topic.
It doesn't matter what else he has to say on the topic. He admits at the beginning of the video that the CO2 leaving the container pushes it. That's all we need to know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should have kept watching, he has more to say on the topic.
It doesn't matter what else he has to say on the topic. He admits at the beginning of the video that the CO2 leaving the container pushes it. That's all we need to know.
Is there a flaw in his calculations or reasoning?
If you find one mark which video and the time stamp so we can discuss it further.
It's an incomplete thought, he continues to develop it dummy.
It makes me smile when Joe claims victory without looking at the contradicting evidence shows how much of a fake scientist he is. He probably won't watch this video either. Even though he is using the scientific method to draw his conclusions.
How has this nonsense made 19 pages?
How has this nonsense made 19 pages?
lol these are great. Keep them coming. I jumped straight to his balloon experiment. By taping a full sheet of paper to the back of the balloon like that, not only has he greatly increased its mass (remember, F=ma), he also essentially puts a huge parachute at the back of his balloon rocket which he precedes to shoot a bunch of air into. No wonder it doesn't go anywhere. Dude needs to learn not only the Laws of Motion, but the forces of flight.
It's like clubbing baby seals, only the baby seal gets up and asks you to hit it again.
Dear god...how does this guy function on a daily basis? I'm sure this is a waste of time for you BB...but here you go:
And, yes, the rocket fuel will burn in a vacuum because it contains it's own oxidizer. Basic chemistry.
Dear god...how does this guy function on a daily basis? I'm sure this is a waste of time for you BB...but here you go:
And, yes, the rocket fuel will burn in a vacuum because it contains it's own oxidizer. Basic chemistry.
lol these are great. Keep them coming. I jumped straight to his balloon experiment. By taping a full sheet of paper to the back of the balloon like that, not only has he greatly increased its mass (remember, F=ma), he also essentially puts a huge parachute at the back of his balloon rocket which he precedes to shoot a bunch of air into. No wonder it doesn't go anywhere. Dude needs to learn not only the Laws of Motion, but the forces of flight.
Dear god...how does this guy function on a daily basis? I'm sure this is a waste of time for you BB...but here you go:
And, yes, the rocket fuel will burn in a vacuum because it contains it's own oxidizer. Basic chemistry.
Science is reproducible, find me another video reproducing these results.
And LOL at a subpar teacher talking down about a certified engineer.
Didn't watch it, but if the 'paper parachute' deflects the air sideways, instead of behind the balloon, it will eliminate the thrust entirely. If the thrust is deflected equally sideways, the thing won't go anywhere.
If you want reproducible...just play the video 10 or 20 times.
How many times has an experiment been run or reproduced to prove this?
We debunked this >15 pages ago, when you refused to take string and track flight times on a globe vs. on your 'flat earth' map. Times didn't add up; at all.
Dear god...how does this guy function on a daily basis? I'm sure this is a waste of time for you BB...but here you go:
And, yes, the rocket fuel will burn in a vacuum because it contains it's own oxidizer. Basic chemistry.
The flaw is in his understanding of science. He's worried about the heat of the thermosphere? Holy shit that's dumb as hell.
I don't believe you actually watched the video. How fake scientistic of you.
You want reproduced experiments? The Space Shuttle was launched over 130 times between 1981 and 2011. I've seen it happen personally.
I already said I didn't. In the first minute he made assertions so ludicrous that - absent the need for a good laugh - watching the rest would have been intellectually painful. Have you figured out yet why his claims on the thermosphere are so f'n dumb?
I know exactly why you think his claims were dumb, but you don't have any idea what he was talking about because you didn't listen to the whole thing.
LOL...he thinks the heat of the thermosphere represents an issue for space travel. WHY is that dumb - and I mean over the top dumb? Explain.
How many videos do they have of the space shuttle leaving the atmosphere and entering 'space'? They can't set up a camera facing forward to capture this, not one time?
Official Score:
Sure you are. Great job. This is hall-of-fame caliber.OP hasn't said anything correct. Lie
OP wins thread by a landslide. Truth
OP is 2nd best troll in America. Not a troll
It wasn't about the heat of the thermosphere, it was about the problems you have COOLING things in the thermosphere. Where does all that built up heat go genius? How do you transfer the heat built up in the ISS/space shuttle into the surrounding atmosphere if the gases are so thin? What law of thermodynamics allows for you to dissipate heat in a vacuum. I'll await your answer.
Rolling on the floor laughing. It radiates. You think you need an atmosphere for radiation? How the hell do you think the energy to HEAT the thermosphere gets here? I'm seriously baffled that your "engineer" could be so dumb? That's dumber than anything YOU'VE posted. I'm almost surprised that you seem to think he knows what he's talking about.
Radiates to what exactly.