ADVERTISEMENT

Chad Leistikow throws appropriate shade at Carver crowds

Maybe kick the donors out of the close lots and give those spaces to those over 60. I love the womens games and parking in dental lot. I Gave up men’s tickets, as who wants to walk from the west lot in the winter. Just my opinion and why we quit going
 
no yea... I don't think the problem is the blue hairs... I think its the mom and pops... they spend too much time eating ice cream and looking at their phone... and nearly no time at all cheering on the Hawkeyes and applauding their effort.

I do think ticket prices are way too high... I agree with that.

but its almost as if we live in world where people aren't getting excited unless they have something to complain about... as if, people are looking for faults in players and or coaches... rather than looking for reasons to support the team they pretend to root for..

I'm serious about that.

look at the game thread from last night... people spend so much time focusing on how poorly they think JO and RM are playing... and PS for that matter... they lose focus on how well the others did play.

the outstanding play of our Hawkeyes gets overshadowed by the perceived weakness of others.

you have a choice to be positive or negative.
being negative does not make you smart.. it makes you dumber than dog doo.

how about this for a unique perspective... enjoy the team you root for..
have fun watching the team you love.

My god calm down. A couple comments about Riley mulvey at the end of a game thread and this guy thinks guys who spend hours a week on this board dont enjoy the actual game.
 
Our attendance ranking is better than our team ranking. That's all I'm saying.

If you want more people to show up, the team has to perform better. Until then, all the free pizza won't matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blhawk
Carver stinks….that Dayton NIT game years ago was fun though….drop the ticket prices and make it general admission.

And these holiday break games? Play them at. Xtream arena and make it general admission too. I know I would be much more inclined to get a crew together, hit up Backpocket, Iowa Athletic Club and 30-hop….then head in and watch the game. It would be a fun evening at IRL.
This.
 
I think the last 2 years are the first time in Fran's tenure he has lost as a higher seed. And Iowa would have been an underdog/lower seeded team in Round 2 even last year since they were a 5 seed.

In any case, you have to keep putting yourself in the best position possible in the Dance and that directly comes from regular season results, which fans can affect (see Iowa-Penn St football game last year).

I'm certainly not saying Iowa losses in NCAA Tournament are caused by fans, I'm saying the likelihood of better Tournament results increases as the team does better in the regular season, and a better home environment can assist on that front.
Iowa with a healthy Keegan Murray would not have been an underdog against Providence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_b29nm7v7dwp6r
This is completely untrue.
On average, we have been ranked much higher in attendance than we have in performance over the past ten years that are under discussion.

2012 #31 att. Unranked
2013 #21 att. Unranked
2014 #17 att. Unranked, first round loss (not top 32)
2015 #20 att. Unranked
2016 #19 att. #25 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2017 #23 att. Unranked
2018 #28 att. Unranked
2019 #23 att. Unranked
2020 #27 att. #25 last poll, no NCAAs due to COVID
2021 COVID #8 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2022 #27 att. #16 last poll, first round loss (not top 32)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: blhawk and HawkOn15
Fran is 6/11 in making the NCAA tournament (soon to be 7-12), and has them going year after year right now. Very good.

Fran just brought home the BIG conference tournament championship. Very good.

No regular season conference titles, not gonna hold that against Fran but doesn’t help.

They lost as a 5 seed last year and has never made a S16. Got boatraced a few times in the NCAA tournament. Poor to very poor.

They play a fun brand of bball, have had some superstars, developed NBA talent, all very good.

Overall a good ambassador to UI and the program.

He’s checking almost all the boxes.
 
On average, we have been ranked much higher in attendance than we have in performance over the past ten years that are under discussion.

2012 #21 att. Unranked
2013 #17 att. Unranked
2014 #20 att. Unranked, first round loss (not top 32)
2015 #19 att. Unranked
2016 #23 att. #25 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2017 #28 att. Unranked
2018 #23 att. Unranked
2019 #27 att. Unranked
2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs
2021 #27 att. #8 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2022 #27 att. #16 last poll, first round loss (not top 32)

You had to go back five years to prove your lie? Well played

Unfortunately, they don’t rank teams 1-32 after the first games of the NCAA tournament.

Which also begs the question how you came up with this: 2021 #27 att. #8 last poll, second round loss (top 32) ???
 
On average, we have been ranked much higher in attendance than we have in performance over the past ten years that are under discussion.

2012 #21 att. Unranked
2013 #17 att. Unranked
2014 #20 att. Unranked, first round loss (not top 32)
2015 #19 att. Unranked
2016 #23 att. #25 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2017 #28 att. Unranked
2018 #23 att. Unranked
2019 #27 att. Unranked
2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs
2021 #27 att. #8 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2022 #27 att. #16 last poll, first round loss (not top 32)

By this logic, 2014 was a play in game loss so Iowa’s ranking would be 65-68th. 🙄
 
LOL. "Our" attendance. How many games have you attended since McC has coached here?

Iowa's performance has been top 25 most of the past 10 years. When is the last time Iowa was top 25 in attendance?

Going off this and previous discussion. Sorry you can't keep up with the conversation.

What is a lie? Facts speak for themselves. Reading comprehension is a good thing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HawkOn15
Going off this and previous discussion. Sorry you can't keep up with the conversation.

What is a lie? Facts speak for themselves. Reading comprehension is a good thing.
I am looking at Iowa men's basketball rankings vs Iowa men's basketball attendance rankings. WTF are you going off? Have you even looked at the schools with better attendance numbers than Iowa?
 
I am looking at Iowa men's basketball rankings vs Iowa men's basketball attendance rankings. WTF are you going off? Have you even looked at the schools with better attendance numbers than Iowa?
Everything I posted was from the NCAA attendance website (linked below).

The rankings were where we finished up each year. The facts speak for themselves.

NCAA Basketball Attendance Rankings
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HawkOn15
I am looking at Iowa men's basketball rankings vs Iowa men's basketball attendance rankings. WTF are you going off? Have you even looked at the schools with better attendance numbers than Iowa?

I can tell you that his numbers are off, that’s for sure. He’s using the year the season started in for attendance and the year it ended in for rankings. (ie: 2020) He has “2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs”. 2019-20 did have attendance and Iowa was 27th while finishing ranked 25th. 2020-21 did not have attendance, but it says Iowa had the 27th ranked attendance and finished ranked 8th.
 
I can tell you that his numbers are off, that’s for sure. He’s using the year the season started in for attendance and the year it ended in for rankings. (ie: 2020) He has “2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs”. 2019-20 did have attendance and Iowa was 27th while finishing ranked 25th. 2020-21 did not have attendance, but it says Iowa had the 27th ranked attendance and finished ranked 8th.
Sorry, was off one year. Numbers corrected in my post. Point stands that we've been higher ranked in attendance vs. performance over the past 10 years.
 
Sorry, was off one year. Numbers corrected in my post. Point stands that we've been higher ranked in attendance vs. performance over the past 10 years.

No, your point does not stand because the last time it happened was four seasons ago.

That would be like me saying Iowa is a top 10 team because they finished 8th (AP) in 2021.

Then again, I’m having a discussion with someone who thinks a team that loses their opening round game of the NCAA Tournament finishes ranked between 33-64th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBHawk
No, your point does not stand because the last time it happened was four seasons ago.

That would be like me saying Iowa is a top 10 team because they finished 8th (AP) in 2021.

Then again, I’m having a discussion with someone who thinks a team that loses their opening round game of the NCAA Tournament finishes ranked between 33-64th.
I'm a person who thinks that a team who loses their first round game is not a top 32 team. Yes, that is correct. You are what your record says you are.

We need more NCAA success (Sweet 16 minimum). That will bring fans.

It hasn't happened in a long, long time, therefore no fans.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HawkOn15
Think his "complaint" comment was directed at the people who do come-as in no complaint about them. It would be good to know the number of the Kinnick crowd live within an hour of CHA.

Someone above mentioned the cost. I'm pretty confident there are more people that can afford to attend every game than CHA could hold living within an hour of CHA.

Iowa is a football state, but the CHA crowds are far too small. Location is part of the problem. Maybe tear down everything across from the Courthouse, or maybe south of the Courthouse. Build some very swanky/trendy/postmodern arena as part of downtown. Make it cool and trendy. Have some club rooms where over 21 can mingle and purchase a limited amount of alcohol. Throw in some fast-food venders and maybe a sit-down restaurant (could be another club-I think that would provide a down grade construction layout so there could be like four different entrances on the different sides of the building and two concourses. Make it big and bright, surely a huge selling point for recruiting I'd think.

It seems if our goal is for basketball to become part of a night on the town the arena would be better placed within walking distance of the town in which people are making a night. It could also provide some revenue by hosting acts playing the big rooms and the odd one-week, or even one day, events like a bull riding tournament. Don't laugh, bull riding sells out.

The University and the City should view such a venture with enthusiasm.​
 
Last edited:
Think his "complaint" comment was directed at the people who do come-as in no complaint about them. It would be good to know the number of the Kinnick crowd live within an hour of CHA.

Someone above mentioned the cost. I'm pretty confident there are more people that can afford to attend every game than CHA could hold living within an hour of CHA.

Iowa is a football state but the CHA crowds are far too small. Location is part of the problem. Maybe tear down everything across from the Courthouse, or maybe south of the Courthouse. Build some very swanky/trendy/post modern arena as part of downtown. Make it cool and trendy. Have some club rooms where over 21 can mingle and purchase a limited amount of alcohol. Throw in some fast-food venders and maybe a sit-down restaurant (could be another club- I think that would provide a down grade construction layout so there could be like four different entrances on the different sides of the building. Make it big and bright, surely a huge selling point for recruiting I'd think.

It seems if our goal is for basketball to become part of a night on the town the arena would be better placed within walking distance of the town in which people are making a night.
This times 100
 
Think his "complaint" comment was directed at the people who do come-as in no complaint about them. It would be good to know the number of the Kinnick crowd live within an hour of CHA.

Someone above mentioned the cost. I'm pretty confident there are more people that can afford to attend every game than CHA could hold living within an hour of CHA.

Iowa is a football state, but the CHA crowds are far too small. Location is part of the problem. Maybe tear down everything across from the Courthouse, or maybe south of the Courthouse. Build some very swanky/trendy/postmodern arena as part of downtown. Make it cool and trendy. Have some club rooms where over 21 can mingle and purchase a limited amount of alcohol. Throw in some fast-food venders and maybe a sit-down restaurant (could be another club-I think that would provide a down grade construction layout so there could be like four different entrances on the different sides of the building and two concourses. Make it big and bright, surely a huge selling point for recruiting I'd think.

It seems if our goal is for basketball to become part of a night on the town the arena would be better placed within walking distance of the town in which people are making a night. It could also provide some revenue by hosting acts playing the big rooms and the odd one-week, or even one day, events like a bull riding tournament. Don't laugh, bull riding sells out.

The University and the City should view such a venture with enthusiasm.​
While I know everyone is going to bring up every negative possible now, this is 100^ correct. Again, part of the allure of Kinnick is the tailgating, the drinking, making a day of it and being with friends. Of course every game is also a Saturday. Carver is just Carver. You go to a game, fight traffic and go home. I think you’d still have some weeknight problems playing the Omaha’s of the world, but so does everyone. Deplorable, you and I don’t agree much but I’m 100% with you on this.
 
I'm a person who thinks that a team who loses their first round game is not a top 32 team. Yes, that is correct. You are what your record says you are.

We need more NCAA success (Sweet 16 minimum). That will bring fans.

It hasn't happened in a long, long time, therefore no fans.

Yes, that makes sense. St Peters (22-12) who finished 2nd in the MAAC regular season ranks 5-8th to end the year.

Losses to:
VCU
Siena X2
Canisius X2
Iona X2
Rider
Stony Brook

They’re the 5th best team in the country because as you say “you are what your record says you are.” 😂 😂 😂



I didn’t realize that you had no idea how rankings work. If I realized that I was responding to someone this ignorant on CBB rankings, I would have just moved on. No wonder that you think attendance rankings are better than season’s end rankings.
 
Last edited:
Yes, that makes sense. St Peters (22-12) who finished 2nd in the MAAC regular season ranks 5-8th to end the year.

Losses to:
VCU
Siena X2
Canisius X2
Iona X2
Rider
Stony Brook

They’re the 5th best team in the country because as you say “you are what your record says you are.” 😂 😂 😂



I didn’t realize that you had no idea how rankings work. If I realized that I was responding to someone this ignorant on CBB rankings, I would have just moved on. No wonder that you think attendance rankings are better than season’s end rankings.
The numbers are what they are.

Point still stands that if the team won more in the tournament, the attendance would be better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blhawk
The last two years were big chances to do things in the tournament as a 2 and 5 seed. Our wings and big men just don’t get a lot of help in the big games.
 
I'm a person who thinks that a team who loses their first round game is not a top 32 team. Yes, that is correct. You are what your record says you are.

We need more NCAA success (Sweet 16 minimum). That will bring fans.

It hasn't happened in a long, long time, therefore no fans.
So the success of a season hinges on one game?

LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iahawks10
So the success of a season hinges on one game?

LOL.
Ask Kentucky fans if their season is judged by one game in the tournament. It may not be fair, but it is what it is. I’ve got buddies that don’t consider it a successful season if they don’t reach the elite 8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blhawk
That wasn't the question. Brewhawk is just being an ahole.
I’m just saying a lot of places you are judged by one game in the tournament. Not as much at iowa. It shouldn’t be like that, all coming down to one game, but at a lot of places it does.
 
The expectations of fans have changed, and not for the better. I would guess it has to do with the media but it is crazy.

In basketball it used to be a successful season if you made the tournament, now, as we have seen in the thread, you have to make the second weekend to be considered a successful season. That means 16 teams were successful the other 250+ failed.

Football is the same. A bowl game basically defined a successful season, especially a win. Now, for the most part you have to make the CFP. This may stretch to going to a NY6 bowl. This again means 16 teams had a successful season, the rest failed.

We even saw people saying the Iowa field hockey team failed because they only made the elite 8. In what world is being a top 10 team not successful?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
The expectations of fans have changed, and not for the better. I would guess it has to do with the media but it is crazy.

In basketball it used to be a successful season if you made the tournament, now, as we have seen in the thread, you have to make the second weekend to be considered a successful season. That means 16 teams were successful the other 250+ failed.

Football is the same. A bowl game basically defined a successful season, especially a win. Now, for the most part you have to make the CFP. This may stretch to going to a NY6 bowl. This again means 16 teams had a successful season, the rest failed.

We even saw people saying the Iowa field hockey team failed because they only made the elite 8. In what world is being a top 10 team not successful?
I think a lot of it has to do with seeding in the tourney and hype. Iowa got trounced by a 7 seeded in Oregon as the 2 seed. Last season, Iowa was a trendy final four pick, even as a five seed and lost first round. That stuff doesn’t help with perception
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaQuintaHawkeye
I'm a casual fan. I'm a UNI Panther first, and we go to several games up there each year. But the spouse is a Hawkeye, we live in town fairly close to Carver and go to several Iowa Men's and Women's basketball games each year.

Personally, I have never warmed up to the current Iowa coaching staff the way I have to others, and I get the sense many Hawkeye-first fans feel the same. I think Fran is a good coach, and he's obviously more successful that the previous coach, more honorable than the one before that... But his style just isn't for me. It's not a regional thing - I grew up watching Hawkeye basketball under Raveling. And even though Davis was from Wisconsin, he had coached on both coasts prior to Iowa. He's just not my cup of tea and probably never will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blhawk
In basketball it used to be a successful season if you made the tournament, now, as we have seen in the thread, you have to make the second weekend to be considered a successful season. That means 16 teams were successful the other 250+ failed.

Sorry brother, but I’m getting a bit annoyed with this counterpoint/straw man argument - also made by others, so not signaling you out.

The people upset about not making it to the S16 (including myself) are upset because it is TOO LONG between trips. NO ONE is saying the season itself isn’t successful because of not making it.

NO ONE is claiming we should make the S16 every year or even every other year, but I think an acceptable expectation for an elite program (consistent T25) like Iowa is to make it once every 3-5 years.
 
Sorry brother, but I’m getting a bit annoyed with this counterpoint/straw man argument - also made by others, so not signaling you out.

The people upset about not making it to the S16 (including myself) are upset because it is TOO LONG between trips. NO ONE is saying the season itself isn’t successful because of not making it.

NO ONE is claiming we should make the S16 every year or even every other year, but I think an acceptable expectation for an elite program (consistent T25) like Iowa is to make it once every 3-5 years.
But to go back to a point being made here, it's self-defeating behavior to not attend/support the program because they aren't fulfilling "your" Sweet 16 expectations.

Poor support means (likely) worse recruiting and less likelihood of winning at Carver (to some marginal degree), which means less likely to make the Sweet 16. Some of the fans in this thread sound like front-runners ("I will not attend unless and until the Hawks are one of the best teams in the country and make the Sweet 16").
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
I'm a casual fan. I'm a UNI Panther first, and we go to several games up there each year. But the spouse is a Hawkeye, we live in town fairly close to Carver and go to several Iowa Men's and Women's basketball games each year.

Personally, I have never warmed up to the current Iowa coaching staff the way I have to others, and I get the sense many Hawkeye-first fans feel the same. I think Fran is a good coach, and he's obviously more successful that the previous coach, more honorable than the one before that... But his style just isn't for me. It's not a regional thing - I grew up watching Hawkeye basketball under Raveling. And even though Davis was from Wisconsin, he had coached on both coasts prior to Iowa. He's just not my cup of tea and probably never will be.
I started as a fan during Lute. Went to Iowa and attended all the home games under Raveling, including trips to Utah and Minnesota for the NCAA tournament games. Moved away, paced the floor clutching the radio during many Tom Davis era games. Suffered through Alfraud and that depressed guy after him, like the rest.

I love Fran's style and thoroughly enjoy watching the teams he puts together. I'm also a fan him of playing lots of guys simply because that running pressing style can sometimes simply wear the other team out. I love his offense first approach and tinkering with position-less basketball etc. So I'm old but I try not think old. I also drink plenty of tea. I would attend every home game if I didn't live so far away, and would regularly piss off the old sit-down guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bishop1971
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT