no yea... I don't think the problem is the blue hairs... I think its the mom and pops... they spend too much time eating ice cream and looking at their phone... and nearly no time at all cheering on the Hawkeyes and applauding their effort.
I do think ticket prices are way too high... I agree with that.
but its almost as if we live in world where people aren't getting excited unless they have something to complain about... as if, people are looking for faults in players and or coaches... rather than looking for reasons to support the team they pretend to root for..
I'm serious about that.
look at the game thread from last night... people spend so much time focusing on how poorly they think JO and RM are playing... and PS for that matter... they lose focus on how well the others did play.
the outstanding play of our Hawkeyes gets overshadowed by the perceived weakness of others.
you have a choice to be positive or negative.
being negative does not make you smart.. it makes you dumber than dog doo.
how about this for a unique perspective... enjoy the team you root for..
have fun watching the team you love.
This.Carver stinks….that Dayton NIT game years ago was fun though….drop the ticket prices and make it general admission.
And these holiday break games? Play them at. Xtream arena and make it general admission too. I know I would be much more inclined to get a crew together, hit up Backpocket, Iowa Athletic Club and 30-hop….then head in and watch the game. It would be a fun evening at IRL.
Iowa with a healthy Keegan Murray would not have been an underdog against Providence.I think the last 2 years are the first time in Fran's tenure he has lost as a higher seed. And Iowa would have been an underdog/lower seeded team in Round 2 even last year since they were a 5 seed.
In any case, you have to keep putting yourself in the best position possible in the Dance and that directly comes from regular season results, which fans can affect (see Iowa-Penn St football game last year).
I'm certainly not saying Iowa losses in NCAA Tournament are caused by fans, I'm saying the likelihood of better Tournament results increases as the team does better in the regular season, and a better home environment can assist on that front.
LOL. "Our" attendance. How many games have you attended since McC has coached here?...and not past the second round.
Our attendance is better than our performance, year in and year out.
It.is.not.Our attendance ranking is better than our team ranking. That's all I'm saying.
If you want more people to show up, the team has to perform better. Until then, all the free pizza won't matter.
Our attendance ranking is better than our team ranking. That's all I'm saying.
If you want more people to show up, the team has to perform better. Until then, all the free pizza won't matter.
On average, we have been ranked much higher in attendance than we have in performance over the past ten years that are under discussion.This is completely untrue.
On average, we have been ranked much higher in attendance than we have in performance over the past ten years that are under discussion.
2012 #21 att. Unranked
2013 #17 att. Unranked
2014 #20 att. Unranked, first round loss (not top 32)
2015 #19 att. Unranked
2016 #23 att. #25 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2017 #28 att. Unranked
2018 #23 att. Unranked
2019 #27 att. Unranked
2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs
2021 #27 att. #8 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2022 #27 att. #16 last poll, first round loss (not top 32)
On average, we have been ranked much higher in attendance than we have in performance over the past ten years that are under discussion.
2012 #21 att. Unranked
2013 #17 att. Unranked
2014 #20 att. Unranked, first round loss (not top 32)
2015 #19 att. Unranked
2016 #23 att. #25 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2017 #28 att. Unranked
2018 #23 att. Unranked
2019 #27 att. Unranked
2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs
2021 #27 att. #8 last poll, second round loss (top 32)
2022 #27 att. #16 last poll, first round loss (not top 32)
LOL. "Our" attendance. How many games have you attended since McC has coached here?
Iowa's performance has been top 25 most of the past 10 years. When is the last time Iowa was top 25 in attendance?
I am looking at Iowa men's basketball rankings vs Iowa men's basketball attendance rankings. WTF are you going off? Have you even looked at the schools with better attendance numbers than Iowa?Going off this and previous discussion. Sorry you can't keep up with the conversation.
What is a lie? Facts speak for themselves. Reading comprehension is a good thing.
Everything I posted was from the NCAA attendance website (linked below).I am looking at Iowa men's basketball rankings vs Iowa men's basketball attendance rankings. WTF are you going off? Have you even looked at the schools with better attendance numbers than Iowa?
I am looking at Iowa men's basketball rankings vs Iowa men's basketball attendance rankings. WTF are you going off? Have you even looked at the schools with better attendance numbers than Iowa?
Sorry, was off one year. Numbers corrected in my post. Point stands that we've been higher ranked in attendance vs. performance over the past 10 years.I can tell you that his numbers are off, that’s for sure. He’s using the year the season started in for attendance and the year it ended in for rankings. (ie: 2020) He has “2020 COVID #25 last poll, no NCAAs”. 2019-20 did have attendance and Iowa was 27th while finishing ranked 25th. 2020-21 did not have attendance, but it says Iowa had the 27th ranked attendance and finished ranked 8th.
Sorry, was off one year. Numbers corrected in my post. Point stands that we've been higher ranked in attendance vs. performance over the past 10 years.
I'm a person who thinks that a team who loses their first round game is not a top 32 team. Yes, that is correct. You are what your record says you are.No, your point does not stand because the last time it happened was four seasons ago.
That would be like me saying Iowa is a top 10 team because they finished 8th (AP) in 2021.
Then again, I’m having a discussion with someone who thinks a team that loses their opening round game of the NCAA Tournament finishes ranked between 33-64th.
This times 100Think his "complaint" comment was directed at the people who do come-as in no complaint about them. It would be good to know the number of the Kinnick crowd live within an hour of CHA.
Someone above mentioned the cost. I'm pretty confident there are more people that can afford to attend every game than CHA could hold living within an hour of CHA.
Iowa is a football state but the CHA crowds are far too small. Location is part of the problem. Maybe tear down everything across from the Courthouse, or maybe south of the Courthouse. Build some very swanky/trendy/post modern arena as part of downtown. Make it cool and trendy. Have some club rooms where over 21 can mingle and purchase a limited amount of alcohol. Throw in some fast-food venders and maybe a sit-down restaurant (could be another club- I think that would provide a down grade construction layout so there could be like four different entrances on the different sides of the building. Make it big and bright, surely a huge selling point for recruiting I'd think.
It seems if our goal is for basketball to become part of a night on the town the arena would be better placed within walking distance of the town in which people are making a night.
While I know everyone is going to bring up every negative possible now, this is 100^ correct. Again, part of the allure of Kinnick is the tailgating, the drinking, making a day of it and being with friends. Of course every game is also a Saturday. Carver is just Carver. You go to a game, fight traffic and go home. I think you’d still have some weeknight problems playing the Omaha’s of the world, but so does everyone. Deplorable, you and I don’t agree much but I’m 100% with you on this.Think his "complaint" comment was directed at the people who do come-as in no complaint about them. It would be good to know the number of the Kinnick crowd live within an hour of CHA.
Someone above mentioned the cost. I'm pretty confident there are more people that can afford to attend every game than CHA could hold living within an hour of CHA.
Iowa is a football state, but the CHA crowds are far too small. Location is part of the problem. Maybe tear down everything across from the Courthouse, or maybe south of the Courthouse. Build some very swanky/trendy/postmodern arena as part of downtown. Make it cool and trendy. Have some club rooms where over 21 can mingle and purchase a limited amount of alcohol. Throw in some fast-food venders and maybe a sit-down restaurant (could be another club-I think that would provide a down grade construction layout so there could be like four different entrances on the different sides of the building and two concourses. Make it big and bright, surely a huge selling point for recruiting I'd think.
It seems if our goal is for basketball to become part of a night on the town the arena would be better placed within walking distance of the town in which people are making a night. It could also provide some revenue by hosting acts playing the big rooms and the odd one-week, or even one day, events like a bull riding tournament. Don't laugh, bull riding sells out.
The University and the City should view such a venture with enthusiasm.
I'm a person who thinks that a team who loses their first round game is not a top 32 team. Yes, that is correct. You are what your record says you are.
We need more NCAA success (Sweet 16 minimum). That will bring fans.
It hasn't happened in a long, long time, therefore no fans.
The numbers are what they are.Yes, that makes sense. St Peters (22-12) who finished 2nd in the MAAC regular season ranks 5-8th to end the year.
Losses to:
VCU
Siena X2
Canisius X2
Iona X2
Rider
Stony Brook
They’re the 5th best team in the country because as you say “you are what your record says you are.” 😂 😂 😂
I didn’t realize that you had no idea how rankings work. If I realized that I was responding to someone this ignorant on CBB rankings, I would have just moved on. No wonder that you think attendance rankings are better than season’s end rankings.
So the success of a season hinges on one game?I'm a person who thinks that a team who loses their first round game is not a top 32 team. Yes, that is correct. You are what your record says you are.
We need more NCAA success (Sweet 16 minimum). That will bring fans.
It hasn't happened in a long, long time, therefore no fans.
Ask Kentucky fans if their season is judged by one game in the tournament. It may not be fair, but it is what it is. I’ve got buddies that don’t consider it a successful season if they don’t reach the elite 8.So the success of a season hinges on one game?
LOL.
That wasn't the question. Brewhawk is just being an ahole.Ask Kentucky fans if their season is judged by one game in the tournament. It may not be fair, but it is what it is.
I’m just saying a lot of places you are judged by one game in the tournament. Not as much at iowa. It shouldn’t be like that, all coming down to one game, but at a lot of places it does.That wasn't the question. Brewhawk is just being an ahole.
So you don't think crowds would be better if we won more?That wasn't the question. Brewhawk is just being an ahole.
Building an on-campus 10,500 seat arena gets my vote.Perhaps Iowa does need to look at alternative venues
I think a lot of it has to do with seeding in the tourney and hype. Iowa got trounced by a 7 seeded in Oregon as the 2 seed. Last season, Iowa was a trendy final four pick, even as a five seed and lost first round. That stuff doesn’t help with perceptionThe expectations of fans have changed, and not for the better. I would guess it has to do with the media but it is crazy.
In basketball it used to be a successful season if you made the tournament, now, as we have seen in the thread, you have to make the second weekend to be considered a successful season. That means 16 teams were successful the other 250+ failed.
Football is the same. A bowl game basically defined a successful season, especially a win. Now, for the most part you have to make the CFP. This may stretch to going to a NY6 bowl. This again means 16 teams had a successful season, the rest failed.
We even saw people saying the Iowa field hockey team failed because they only made the elite 8. In what world is being a top 10 team not successful?
So you don't think recruiting would be better if people showed up?So you don't think crowds would be better if we won more?
In basketball it used to be a successful season if you made the tournament, now, as we have seen in the thread, you have to make the second weekend to be considered a successful season. That means 16 teams were successful the other 250+ failed.
But to go back to a point being made here, it's self-defeating behavior to not attend/support the program because they aren't fulfilling "your" Sweet 16 expectations.Sorry brother, but I’m getting a bit annoyed with this counterpoint/straw man argument - also made by others, so not signaling you out.
The people upset about not making it to the S16 (including myself) are upset because it is TOO LONG between trips. NO ONE is saying the season itself isn’t successful because of not making it.
NO ONE is claiming we should make the S16 every year or even every other year, but I think an acceptable expectation for an elite program (consistent T25) like Iowa is to make it once every 3-5 years.
I started as a fan during Lute. Went to Iowa and attended all the home games under Raveling, including trips to Utah and Minnesota for the NCAA tournament games. Moved away, paced the floor clutching the radio during many Tom Davis era games. Suffered through Alfraud and that depressed guy after him, like the rest.I'm a casual fan. I'm a UNI Panther first, and we go to several games up there each year. But the spouse is a Hawkeye, we live in town fairly close to Carver and go to several Iowa Men's and Women's basketball games each year.
Personally, I have never warmed up to the current Iowa coaching staff the way I have to others, and I get the sense many Hawkeye-first fans feel the same. I think Fran is a good coach, and he's obviously more successful that the previous coach, more honorable than the one before that... But his style just isn't for me. It's not a regional thing - I grew up watching Hawkeye basketball under Raveling. And even though Davis was from Wisconsin, he had coached on both coasts prior to Iowa. He's just not my cup of tea and probably never will be.