You can keep insulting all you want, but your answers still lack any sort of consistency. If you don't think political commentary (does that word suit you better?) should be present outside of a political setting, that's a fine position to have, but only if that's your position across the board. What about that are you not understanding?
Personally, I believe anyone has the clearance to throw out their political opinions in whatever setting they choose whether that be celebrities at award shows, musicians through their music, writers through their writing, average joes on social media, athletes on the field, or anyone in front of a camera. I agree with your "if you don't like it, tune it out" mantra, but I don't selectively apply it.
I am sorry you take them as insults as opposed to genuine observations. I'll try one more time.
I'm not talking about "political commentary" in general, or whether it "should" be present. I don't have some grand position that spans across the board. There's an important concept called context.
The context I've been talking about is chanting "FVCK JOE BIDEN" at sporting events. Based on the context that this occurs, I think these people are pathetic, and worthy of pity. I have explained why in simple terms and in several different ways.
My comments about DeNiro have been to point out that the context is different, and that accordingly your application of "logic" does not fit. This has only been in the context of posters trying to pull some whataboutisms.
Your second paragraph leads me again to confirm that you are not understanding what I am typing. Clearance? I've never said they don't have the right to chant, or that they don't have the clearance to chant. My position is that they are pathetic for chanting as opposed to enjoying the reasons most people attend sporting events, while polluting the environment for the rest of the people who are there to enjoy the event.
One thing you do seem to understand, is that I
am selectively applying my comments to this specific context of the subject of this thread: miserable people who can't pause politics to enjoy a sporting event and instead choose to chant vulgarities.
Wonderful to hear about your consistent, non selective application of your meticulous logic. I'm sure that would hold true if dozens of people surrounded your dining table at a restaurant and started chanting "Black Lives Matter" or chanted the same outside your house in the middle of the night with a bullhorn.
You'd endure it because you don't selectively apply the "if you don't like it, tune it out" mantra.
I appreciate people trying to use logic, but you might want to google "logical fallacies" and do some investigation.