Because you can't discuss the acquisition of professional athletes without discussing money. My employer didn't hire me over other firms because they have the eye of the tiger.
Athletes do not operate like traditional emmployees. I've never given an interview where I talked about "warrior spirit" or "cash cows get slaughtered", etc.
Hmmm, so NLWC being able to afford a multitude of world class athletes and create a great training environment + being able to offer a livable salary during a recession doesn't play a significant factor in their ability to entice elite athletes from outside PSU (such as Snyder and Gilman) to join their club?
If Retherford, Snyder, DT, and Nolf, Nickal, etc were training elsewhere would Gilman still have gone to NLWC?
So you want to just discuss money at all times, even if it's two or three degree removed from the conversation. And not just discuss it, only discuss it, because talking about it as literally the first thing in analyzing the situation isn't enough. So this is a rough draft about how you think it should have gone.
"Obviously a huge factor is money. They have more.
Second, they have great training partners....because of money.
Third, they have great facilities! (because of money).
Fourth, his wife is from there and they want to start a family. (Money?)
In closing, $$$."