ADVERTISEMENT

Deacon Hill QB1 for spring ball

I understand the "relax, it's just the spring depth chart" argument.
However, the fact that he's still on the roster is problematic itself. To compound that, being QB 1 on the depth chart is inexcusable.
He satisfies the bare minimum qualifications of being able to stand upright and take a snap. How that manages to result in being listed at QB1 at ANY time on the depth chart would be mystifying anywhere but at Iowa under Kirk.
 
I understand the "relax, it's just the spring depth chart" argument.
However, the fact that he's still on the roster is problematic itself. To compound that, being QB 1 on the depth chart is inexcusable.
He satisfies the bare minimum qualifications of being able to stand upright and take a snap. How that manages to result in being listed at QB1 at ANY time on the depth chart would be mystifying anywhere but at Iowa under Kirk.
And yet we have one poster who thinks Hill needs to be "beat out" for his position. :rolleyes:
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT