For beating Ohio State, so that his little tiders could get into the
Playoff, last year ??
Asking for a friend.
Playoff, last year ??
Asking for a friend.
what did Alabama do to earn a Playoff spot?
they were 11-1 with only 8 wins over Power-5 teams
they did not win their Division
they did not win their Conference
Wisconsin was 12-1 with 9 wins against Power-5 teams
(West Division Champ)
Ohio State was 11-2 with 9 wins against Power-5 teams.
(Big Ten Champ)
neither Wisconsin nor Ohio State played an FCS team.
Alabama played Mercer... an FCS team... late in the season.
Iowa beating Ohio State should serve as an example that anyone can beat anybody on any given day...
so throwing Alabama into the mix gave them a chance... but did they earn it?
did they deserve to be thrown into the mix?
imo, they did not... and for me it completely ruined the relevancy and legitimacy of the current f'BS' Playoff System.
no no... thats absolute BS.... I don't believe Ohio State earned it the year before either... my argument has always been...There are compelling arguments why Alabama shouldn't have made the playoffs, but the problem is Wisconsin and Ohio State weren't better alternatives.
Wisconsin played a weak schedule and didn't win their conference, either, and Ohio State had more than one loss, one being by 30 points to unranked Iowa.
Alabama clearly proved they deserved to be there by beating Clemson and Georgia. I get fans are sick of Alabama but that isn't a logical argument for why they shouldn't have been the #4 seed last year. The whole they didn't win their conference argument is bunk. None of you were using it the year before when Ohio State snuck in. And the whole point of the CFP was to get the 4 best teams in period. Clearly, Alabama was one of the four best teams.
This was never going to be more then another beauty pagent until they put all the conference champs into the playoff. If your going to let some group of people PICK who's in and who's not, then your going to have discontent.no no... thats absolute BS.... I don't believe Ohio State earned it the year before either... my argument has always been...
Conference Champions Only
if you are going to say Wisconsin's schedule was weak... lets compare Wisconsin with Alabama.
during the regular season Wisconsin was 12-0
Alabama was 11-1
Wisconsin had 9 wins over Power-5 teams
Alabama had 8 wins over Power-5 teams
Alabama had ZERO wins over 10-win teams
ZERO... think about that
Wisconsin at least had one win over a 10-win team (Northwestern)
plus Wisconsin never played an FCS team
Alabama did (Mercer)
the Mercer Bears....
a 5-6 FCS Mercer Bears team
its my opinion that not only did Wisconsin have a stronger schedule... they won all their regular season games...
Alabama did not.
and not only did Alabama not win all their regular season games...
the games they played were against weaker opponents
again... not one single opponent Alabama faced during the regular season ended the year with 10 wins.
I think its stupid... and it has completely ruined the idea of College Playoffs for me.
I think he means Sagat. Must be a Street Fighter fan.Who is Sabin?
Drunk on a Monday?Did I spell you boys name wrong, or something ?
GO HAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWGs
no no... thats absolute BS.... I don't believe Ohio State earned it the year before either... my argument has always been...
Conference Champions Only
if you are going to say Wisconsin's schedule was weak... lets compare Wisconsin with Alabama.
during the regular season Wisconsin was 12-0
Alabama was 11-1
Wisconsin had 9 wins over Power-5 teams
Alabama had 8 wins over Power-5 teams
Alabama had ZERO wins over 10-win teams
ZERO... think about that
Wisconsin at least had one win over a 10-win team (Northwestern)
plus Wisconsin never played an FCS team
Alabama did (Mercer)
the Mercer Bears....
a 5-6 FCS Mercer Bears team
its my opinion that not only did Wisconsin have a stronger schedule... they won all their regular season games...
Alabama did not.
and not only did Alabama not win all their regular season games...
the games they played were against weaker opponents
again... not one single opponent Alabama faced during the regular season ended the year with 10 wins.
I think its stupid... and it has completely ruined the idea of College Playoffs for me.
Evidenced by the fact that they won the National Championship.There are compelling arguments why Alabama shouldn't have made the playoffs, but the problem is Wisconsin and Ohio State weren't better alternatives.
Wisconsin played a weak schedule and didn't win their conference, either, and Ohio State had more than one loss, one being by 30 points to unranked Iowa.
Alabama clearly proved they deserved to be there by beating Clemson and Georgia. I get fans are sick of Alabama but that isn't a logical argument for why they shouldn't have been the #4 seed last year. The whole they didn't win their conference argument is bunk. None of you were using it the year before when Ohio State snuck in. And the whole point of the CFP was to get the 4 best teams in period. Clearly, Alabama was one of the four best teams.
Oh St was probably the best team in the country last year.There are compelling arguments why Alabama shouldn't have made the playoffs, but the problem is Wisconsin and Ohio State weren't better alternatives.
Wisconsin played a weak schedule and didn't win their conference, either, and Ohio State had more than one loss, one being by 30 points to unranked Iowa.
Alabama clearly proved they deserved to be there by beating Clemson and Georgia. I get fans are sick of Alabama but that isn't a logical argument for why they shouldn't have been the #4 seed last year. The whole they didn't win their conference argument is bunk. None of you were using it the year before when Ohio State snuck in. And the whole point of the CFP was to get the 4 best teams in period. Clearly, Alabama was one of the four best teams.
For beating Ohio State, so that his little tiders could get into the
Playoff, last year ??
Asking for a friend.
Did I spell you boys name wrong, or something ?
GO HAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWGs
What's more likely, Saban thanking Kirk or IowaNiceHawk making a coherent post?
Oh St was probably the best team in the country last year.
Whether they deserved to get in or not is debatable but they deserved to be in over Ala.
Side note, they would’ve beat Ala & won the title had they gotten in.
What is it that you cannot understand.
I'll try a diagram for you.
You couldn’t handle it. It’s called reality.I’ll have some of what you’re smoking.
You couldn’t handle it. It’s called reality.
I've been saying this for a while. This would be a great system and add a whopping 1 game for those teams. If the added game is really too much on the players I think most CFB fans would be fine with eliminating 1 non-con game (usually against a nobody) to make up for it.I wish the playoff were 8 teams, with the 5 Conference champs from the Power 5 conferences, then 3 at large. It won't totally eliminate all complaints, but would help. Oh, the first round playoff games would be home games for the top 4 seeds.
I've been saying this for a while. This would be a great system and add a whopping 1 game for those teams. If the added game is really too much on the players I think most CFB fans would be fine with eliminating 1 non-con game (usually against a nobody) to make up for it.
Auburn 26 - Alabama 14What reality? Iowa 55 - OSU 24
You sure Ohio State was the best team in the country last year?
Play tougher non conference competition, don’t lose to Auburn, play (and win) an extra game against tough competition on a neutral field (conference title game), & DEFINITELY don’t play Mercer when the big boys are playing a 9th conference game!So, the team that won the national championship didn't deserve to be in the playoffs to begin with? By that logic, isn't the entire premise of a playoff invalid? If the team that won it all should have been left out for losing one game and playing a team like Mercer, what criteria should be used to determine who gets in? Alabama had 12 players drafted this year-four of them in the first round. Who deserved to get in over them? OSU? Seriously? The team that lost a game at home and got destroyed at Iowa?
Wow, you sobered up fast!What is it that you cannot understand.
I'll try a diagram for you.
Why not Iowa?.....Let's think outside the box here.So, the team that won the national championship didn't deserve to be in the playoffs to begin with? By that logic, isn't the entire premise of a playoff invalid? If the team that won it all should have been left out for losing one game and playing a team like Mercer, what criteria should be used to determine who gets in? Alabama had 12 players drafted this year-four of them in the first round. Who deserved to get in over them? OSU? Seriously? The team that lost a game at home and got destroyed at Iowa?
Play tougher non conference competition, don’t lose to Auburn, play (and win) an extra game against tough competition on a neutral field (conference title game), & DEFINITELY don’t play Mercer when the big boys are playing a 9th conference game!
Iowa was a too 20 team last year that played a top 5 schedule.
And also Saban himself is on record as saying previously that a team that can't even win it's own conference shouldn't be in the playoffs.what did Alabama do to earn a Playoff spot?
they were 11-1 with only 8 wins over Power-5 teams
they did not win their Division
they did not win their Conference
Wisconsin was 12-1 with 9 wins against Power-5 teams
(West Division Champ)
Ohio State was 11-2 with 9 wins against Power-5 teams.
(Big Ten Champ)
neither Wisconsin nor Ohio State played an FCS team.
Alabama played Mercer... an FCS team... late in the season.
Iowa beating Ohio State should serve as an example that anyone can beat anybody on any given day...
so throwing Alabama into the mix gave them a chance... but did they earn it?
did they deserve to be thrown into the mix?
imo, they did not... and for me it completely ruined the relevancy and legitimacy of the current f'BS' Playoff System.
Then since they are always loaded with that much talent, and will always be a likely odds-on fave for the NC, let's just automatically let them in the playoff each year since clearly they have the most talent and best coach. Pay no attention to if they even win their division (let alone their conference). Just pencil them in. Is that what you're saying?So, the team that won the national championship didn't deserve to be in the playoffs to begin with? By that logic, isn't the entire premise of a playoff invalid? If the team that won it all should have been left out for losing one game and playing a team like Mercer, what criteria should be used to determine who gets in? Alabama had 12 players drafted this year-four of them in the first round. Who deserved to get in over them? OSU? Seriously? The team that lost a game at home and got destroyed at Iowa?
So, the team that won the national championship didn't deserve to be in the playoffs to begin with? By that logic, isn't the entire premise of a playoff invalid? If the team that won it all should have been left out for losing one game and playing a team like Mercer, what criteria should be used to determine who gets in? Alabama had 12 players drafted this year-four of them in the first round. Who deserved to get in over them? OSU? Seriously? The team that lost a game at home and got destroyed at Iowa?[/QU
They got in by their talent and coaching alone. Didn't have the on-field credentials after playing their season, to warrant a spot. If that's how it works, trash the playoffs. Just go down the list at the beginning of the year, rate the overall talent on each team, pick the top four, and let 'em rumble.Evidenced by the fact that they won the National Championship.
Ohio State shouldn't have been in it the year before either.There are compelling arguments why Alabama shouldn't have made the playoffs, but the problem is Wisconsin and Ohio State weren't better alternatives.
Wisconsin played a weak schedule and didn't win their conference, either, and Ohio State had more than one loss, one being by 30 points to unranked Iowa.
Alabama clearly proved they deserved to be there by beating Clemson and Georgia. I get fans are sick of Alabama but that isn't a logical argument for why they shouldn't have been the #4 seed last year. The whole they didn't win their conference argument is bunk. None of you were using it the year before when Ohio State snuck in. And the whole point of the CFP was to get the 4 best teams in period. Clearly, Alabama was one of the four best teams.
Then since they are always loaded with that much talent, and will always be a likely odds-on fave for the NC, let's just automatically let them in the playoff each year since clearly they have the most talent and best coach. Pay no attention to if they even win their division (let alone their conference). Just pencil them in. Is that what you're saying?
Play tougher non conference competition, don’t lose to Auburn, play (and win) an extra game against tough competition on a neutral field (conference title game), & DEFINITELY don’t play Mercer when the big boys are playing a 9th conference game!
Iowa was a too 20 team last year that played a top 5 schedule.
saban has won a national title twice without winning his conference.. but yes Wisconsin has a better resume then bama had last year.And Saban himself i
And also Saban himself is on record as saying previously that a team that can't even win it's own conference shouldn't be in the playoffs.
UmmFor beating Ohio State, so that his little tiders could get into the
Playoff, last year ??
Asking for a friend.