It’s amazing at how so many people buy into the lie of moral superiority
What's the lie of moral superiority? I want to find out if I buy into it or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s amazing at how so many people buy into the lie of moral superiority
The owner had the right to do what she did. But on the flip side people defending that action is just astonishing. So you bar someone from eating in your restaurant because you don't agree with their politics? So you want to eliminate half of your customers. Doesn't seem very smart to me and kind of arrogant.
Your statement is the exact same thing you are accusing the named posters of. If you think hrot lefties are so evil they would celebrate the death of someone, well that is just as evil a your assertion.Not when one side honestly believes they are superior human beings to the other side and that the other side is pure evil. I wonder how many of our local lefties on here would celebrate if something terrible happened to our president? Huey, JOE, and torbee would hold parades in the streets.
Not when one side honestly believes they are superior human beings to the other side and that the other side is pure evil. I wonder how many of our local lefties on here would celebrate if something terrible happened to our president? Huey, JOE, and torbee would hold parades in the streets.
I already did that too.Not really. Give it another try. Since you seem to know my thoughts on he subject, feel free to enlighten me.
I wish I had that kind of power. Alas, I do not.Which is you trying to set the rules.
Democrats: YOU CANT DISCRIMINATE
Also Democrats: YAY DISCRIMINATION
I wish I had that kind of power. Alas, I do not.
My rules are consistent, though. So that’s something.
I perused the first page of this thread but quickly decided to move on. Some of the actions and words of the left are the best examples of genuine moral depravity.
I don't wish him harm, I just wish him gone..Not when one side honestly believes they are superior human beings to the other side and that the other side is pure evil. I wonder how many of our local lefties on here would celebrate if something terrible happened to our president? Huey, JOE, and torbee would hold parades in the streets.
If no forcing someone to violate their principles is twisted then mark me down as twisted.I'll give you that they're consistent. It's just their consistently biased to your twisted way of thinking.
If no forcing someone to violate their principles is twisted then mark me down as twisted.
Because a restaurant is a business of public accommodation. Why do I have to keep explaining this?Then why do you have a problem with refusing service to SHS?
Because a restaurant is a business of public accommodation. Why do I have to keep explaining this?
I already did that too.
So is baking someone a cake.
You said, you believe in not forcing someone to violate their principles. But that isn't what you believe. You only believe it when it works in your favor. Typical Trump supporter.
Clearly.Staying out of an discussion you know will make you look foolish. Smart move on your part.
Says the person who worships Trump and all of his actions. You need to work on your own morals before judging others.
To be clear, are you saying that both the cake maker and the owner of the restaurant should be able to refuse service?
What are you even blabbering about?
Creating a custom designed cake for a specific occasion is not a public accommodation. Selling cakes and other baked goods out of a display case is a public accommodation. The Colorado baker offered to sell them anything they wanted to buy out of his display case but refused to bake a custom cake.So is baking someone a cake.
You said, you believe in not forcing someone to violate their principles. But that isn't what you believe. You only believe it when it works in your favor. Typical Trump supporter.
I'm saying that if the cake maker can refuse service than the restaurant should be able to refuse service. Some of these posters feel it's ok for one but not the other. To me it's an all or nothing thing as long as it doesn't break any laws.
Of course you think it’s all or nothing, because you’re utterly incapable of nuanced thought.I'm saying that if the cake maker can refuse service than the restaurant should be able to refuse service. Some of these posters feel it's ok for one but not the other. To me it's an all or nothing thing as long as it doesn't break any laws.
Creating a custom designed cake for a specific occasion is not a public accommodation. Selling cakes and other baked goods out of a display case is a public accommodation. The Colorado baker offered to sell them anything they wanted to buy out of his display case but refused to bake a custom cake.
SHS had every right to sit down at a table and enjoy a meal with her family but she does not have a right to demand that the restaurant cater a party at her home. I believe this whether it “works in my favor” or it works against my favor. If you weren’t so f*cking stupid you might be able to comprehend the distinction.
Of course you think it’s all or nothing, because you’re utterly incapable of nuanced thought.
Of course you think it’s all or nothing, because you’re utterly incapable of nuanced thought.
Bingo. This double edged sword cuts both ways.
Remember when Northern's avatar was that fake image of sunlight bleeding through an American flag in the shape of a cross?
I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do soWhat’s the lie?
Why are you pretending that hiring a baker to create a custom-made wedding cake, which takes hours to design, bake, and decorate, is the same as ordering a cheeseburger off the menu, which takes about a minute and a half to slap together?And your nuanced thought is that there is a distinction between two state licensed businesses that are open to the public and sell food but refuse to provide service based on their principles:
The baker can refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple, but the cook at the restaurant cannot refuse to make Sarah's double cheeseburger and fries?
You really see a distinction there - either factual or legal?