ADVERTISEMENT

Does Iowa fear Bert?

Nevada,

I hate to agree on this one...but I feel the same. Bielema will get the Illini into the West Champiosnhip in a few years. He knows Big 10 country and style. That said...GO HAWKS!
He walked into a once-in-a-lifetime situation in WI, following one of their greatest coaches. He failed miserably at Arkansas. The situation he is walking into at IL is more like Arkansas than WI. I give him less than a 50% chance at bringing IL football back to being competitive for a B1G West title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jthawk and rfgiowa
He walked into a once-in-a-lifetime situation in WI, following one of their greatest coaches. He failed miserably at Arkansas. The situation he is walking into at IL is more like Arkansas than WI. I give him less than a 50% chance at bringing IL football back to being competitive for a B1G West title.
At Arkansas, Petrino had them go 10-2 through the regular season (lost to 'bama by just 4 points) in 2010. They followed that up with another 10-2 season in 2011 under Petrino. However, after that, the scandal surrounding Petrino broke out ... and John L. Smith took over for the 2012 season [maybe akin to an interim coach?] ... and the Razorbacks had a down year, going 4-8. Then, following that, they hired Brett.

Thus, given that Arkansas was just 1 year removed from 2 consecutive 10 to 10+ win seasons ... that points to Brett entering a pretty decent situation there.

In contrast, here is the time series of the Illini program under Lovie Smith:
'16: 3-9
'17: 2-10
'18: 4-8
'19: 6-7 (got a bowl showing!)
'20: 2-6

One of the big criticisms that Illini fans had for the program under Smith was that they accused him of being a "lazy" recruiter. That was certainly an issue ... but arguably a bigger one was a lack of a true identity (on either side of the ball).

Without question, I'd say that Brett is entering a much tougher situation than he faced in EITHER of his prior head-coaching gigs.

However, he will offer the Illini an upgrade in recruiting [he's a pretty tenacious recruiter] ... AND he definitely has a vision for the identity of his teams too. I think that he'll have less problem trying to institute a midwestern blue-collar toughness/nastiness identity in Illinois than in Arkansas. The trouble with doing so in Arkansas is that kids there see the basketball on grass style to their west (in Texas) ... and all the track-speed in the rest of the SEC ... and so it might be a harder sell to promote a more "traditional" style of football there.

I don't know what to expect from Illinois ... but I do know that it is a tough gig.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBHawk
At Arkansas, Petrino had them go 10-2 through the regular season (lost to 'bama by just 4 points) in 2010. They followed that up with another 10-2 season in 2011 under Petrino. However, after that, the scandal surrounding Petrino broke out ... and John L. Smith took over for the 2012 season [maybe akin to an interim coach?] ... and the Razorbacks had a down year, going 4-8. Then, following that, they hired Brett.

Thus, given that Arkansas was just 1 year removed from 2 consecutive 10 to 10+ win seasons ... that points to Brett entering a pretty decent situation there.

In contrast, here is the time series of the Illini program under Lovie Smith:
'16: 3-9
'17: 2-10
'18: 4-8
'19: 6-7 (got a bowl showing!)
'20: 2-6

One of the big criticisms that Illini fans had for the program under Smith was that they accused him of being a "lazy" recruiter. That was certainly an issue ... but arguably a bigger one was a lack of a true identity (on either side of the ball).

Without question, I'd say that Brett is entering a much tougher situation than he faced in EITHER of his prior head-coaching gigs.

However, he will offer the Illini an upgrade in recruiting [he's a pretty tenacious recruiter] ... AND he definitely has a vision for the identity of his teams too. I think that he'll have less problem trying to institute a midwestern blue-collar toughness/nastiness identity in Illinois than in Arkansas. The trouble with doing so in Arkansas is that kids there see the basketball on grass style to their west (in Texas) ... and all the track-speed in the rest of the SEC ... and so it might be a harder sell to promote a more "traditional" style of football there.

I don't know what to expect from Illinois ... but I do know that it is a tough gig.
That was my point. Ar was on the way down when BB got there, while WI was still cresting from Alvarez. BB got too big for his britches (figuratively and literally ;) ) and he and Alvarez butted heads. Barry won. Brett bit the big one in AR and really came down hard. He'll be lucky if he can get it done at IL.
 
There is quite a lot of parity in the B1G West.

Despite his circus antics ... Fleck has shown that he can field decent teams coming out of Minnesota.

Wisconsin remains the primary "big dog" of the West until someone else can prove that they can regularly unseat them.

Iowa and Northwestern are both solid programs ... Northwestern owning 2 divisional titles to Iowa's 1 over the past 6 years. Both are fine and strong programs.

Brohm has pulled Purdue out of the sewer ... but they have still been pretty consistently inconsistent. Obviously they show the potential to be extremely dynamic on offense ... at least via the passing game.

For a while, it appeared that Illinois had been a dumpster fire ... however, part of that may have been youth on the squad ... because, it had appeared that Lovie Smith had the Illini on the "upswing." Brett has something to work with there in Urbana-Champaign. I agree that Brett will likely field a competitive squad there. However, will it ascend to the upper echelons of the conference or division? That will remain to be seen.

As for Nebraska ... it's hard to say. It's probably best to still describe them as being consistently inconsistent. If I were to guess ... culture seems to be the biggest problem there. They suffer from some of the same sort of issues that Michigan faces ... a lot of entitlement issues where they automatically think that the emblem on their jersey makes them great. They need to "earn the right" to be that level of stupid-cocky. It strikes me that Scott Frost is too close to the Huskers of yesteryear to realize the error in that side of things. Unlike Michigan ... the Huskers don't benefit from the same immediate bed of recruiting talent ... so their level of performance has been well below that of Michigan.
Good analysis ghost. You are correct on each team.
 
Illinois recruiting has been really hard to figure out, they do tend to attract some top level skill athletes and do recruit CA, TX and FL, though not necessarily well (e.g. a lot of 2 star guys). They just did not seem to get enough solid 3 star guys each year.

Here is their 2018 class as an example


Not going out on a limb here, but would think it will be the WI blueprint. I think IL has historically been able to recruit really athletic QB's and this might turn out to be his secret sauce. They will HAVE to recruit better O Lineman. I predict they will be competitive in the West, 6-7 wins per year, just below Iowa.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT