Can’t remember what my post was. I obviously deleted it for a reason. I do have a question for you. Ferentz has had 2, 7-5 years out of 19 years here at Iowa. His average record over those 19 years is 8-5. Why do Ferentz haters continually use 7-5 as the record that defines his success?Roger to answer your question. I would put him in the facility as a way of honoring the man/maker of men he is. I would not put him near the stadium because coaches that win championships go near the stadium. That's just my 2 cents.
(I saw your post before you removed it and it was a valid ?)
It's actually between 7-5 (58.3%) and 8-5 (61.5%) as his winning percentage at Iowa is, I believe, 59.6% (143-97). So call it 7.5-5, which is about what Fry had as well.Can’t remember what my post was. I obviously deleted it for a reason. I do have a question for you. Ferentz has had 2, 7-5 years out of 19 years here at Iowa. His average record over those 19 years is 8-5. Why do Ferentz haters continually use 7-5 as the record that defines his success?
Can’t remember what my post was. I obviously deleted it for a reason. I do have a question for you. Ferentz has had 2, 7-5 years out of 19 years here at Iowa. His average record over those 19 years is 8-5. Why do Ferentz haters continually use 7-5 as the record that defines his success?
Add to that his B1G record: 86-68 (55.8%)It's actually between 7-5 (58.3%) and 8-5 (61.5%) as his winning percentage at Iowa is, I believe, 59.6% (143-97). So call it 7.5-5, which is about what Fry had as well.
Sorry. Makes absolutely no sense. Skew the numbers all you want. His average wins per year is over 7.5....so that rounds to 8, not 7. His losses per year average something like 5.1. That rounds to 5. So 8-5 should be his average yearly record. Where the hell did you come up with 8-4? Oops. Forget it. I do not want to belabor my point.Your question was in regards to me personally thinking it was a good idea to make a statue. No worries. I used "7-5" (in qoutes) because that is the record the people likely to vote "no" would reference. Fwiw. Over 19 years he has 143 regular season wins and 97 losses. 7.5 regular season wins and 5.1 regulars season losses. Since 5.1. Is over 5 you cannot round down and there are not 13 regular season games which is where I imagine 7-5 comes from. KF is also 7 of 15 in bowls which gets him 7.8 wins a season but 5.5 losses, however we have not played 14 games in a season and 5.5 cannot go down to 5 and round 7.8 up to 8 while presenting the numbers as valid. As we all know you cannot win or lose half a game so 7-5 is by definition more accurate than portraying him as an 8-4 coach.
Sorry. Makes absolutely no sense. Skew the numbers all you want. His average wins per year is over 7.5....so that rounds to 8, not 7. His losses per year average something like 5.1. That rounds to 5. So 8-5 should be his average yearly record. Where the hell did you come up with 8-4? Oops. Forget it. I do not want to belabor my point.
Never heard of rounding 7.51 down to 7 instead of rounding up to 8. I sure hope there are no kids reading this.He averages 5.5 big10 wins a year.......
We average 12.6 games a season. (Since 6 wins gets a bowl most years)
Put ya like this 20 years ago if you would have bet on KF going over 7 wins a year you would have made money. If the number was 8 you would have lost money. There isn't a half a win. By default he is a 7 win a year coach. If you want to say he is a 7.5 win a year coach I suppose that would be valid. There is a reason Vegas always sets lines at .5s though, you can't push.
Never heard of rounding 7.51 down to 7 instead of rounding up to 8. I sure hope there are no kids reading this.
Better let the associated press know because they include bowl wins and losses in their final rankings. Let them know those are not real wins and losses. Skew away!More like, when there are 12 games during the regular season we cannot round up to 8-5. And we cannot round 5.1 to 4 so 7.5 stays a 7.
Better let the associated press know because they include bowl wins and losses in their final rankings. Let them know those are not real wins and losses. Skew away!
How the hell did you come up with 6? Would you quit it with the lies? Holy shit. He has averaged 5.1 losses a year you freaking moron. I am done.That doesnt help, those numbers have been presented and both would by definition round up. By your math he is a 8-6 coach but we have only once played 14 games.
How the hell did you come up with 6? Would you quit it with the lies? Holy shit. He has averaged 5.1 losses a year you freaking moron. I am done.
I checked 2 sources and they both have Coach Ferentz’s 19 year record at 143-97. Get a calculator. Turn it on first.Not when you include the bowls you wanted to include. He averaged 5.5 losses a year. C'mon man, the numbers are all provided.
I checked 2 sources and they both have Coach Ferentz’s 19 year record at 143-97. Get a calculator. Turn it on first.
Exactly. Where did I say 7.8?Those are his regular season numbers right? Which break down to 7.51 and 5.1 right? Where did you get 7.8? Because you included bowl games. Which brings his losses to 7.5. Are you really this dense?
For Iowa? Absolutely. Unless I missed where we became a Blue-blood school all of a sudden. Recently, schools like Texas, Florida, Michigan, USC, UCLA, Nebraska, Miami, and Notre Dame have had problems with finding coaches that could surpass 0.600 consistently.Actually, the point is simple:
Coach Ferentz, while at Iowa, has won 59.6% of his games; and
Coach Ferentz, while at Iowa, has won 55.8% of his B1G games.
Statue worthy?
Exactly. Where did I say 7.8?
Liar. Where did I say 7.8? You just said that I did? Twice now I have shown you are a complete freaking tool and now you lie. Poor fella.You might want to sit this one out man. Not only are you willing to fall on the sword that 7.5 does not equal 7 in a sport that does not allow for ties your looking really foolish doing it.
Now I know where the bar is...yikes.For Iowa? Absolutely. Unless I missed where we became a Blue-blood school all of a sudden. Recently, schools like Texas, Florida, Michigan, USC, UCLA, Nebraska, Miami, and Notre Dame have had problems with finding coaches that could surpass 0.600 consistently.
I sure as hell would like to see what Kirk could do with 4-5* players constantly falling in his lap based on school name alone.
Blair is a man on a mission today.
Where did you come up with 5.5 losses a season Einsteen?Not when you include the bowls you wanted to include. He averaged 5.5 losses a year. C'mon man, the numbers are all provided.
Only at Iowa would they reward 'average' with a statue.Now I know where the bar is...yikes.
Where did you come up with 5.5 losses a season Einsteen?
Couldn't agree more! Great man, B1G Coach of the Year numerous times, super clean program, charities, etc...name building, field house, park, whatever, in his name, but stop this statue sh-t.surprised someone hasn't already recommended a statue that looks almost like Kirk going up under center with a smile and Barta looking very apprehensive awaiting the snap count . Seriously Kirk deserves a statue or some type of honor , winning Coach who has run a clean program .
Statues are overdone, I mean after Buddy Jesus whats the point ?Couldn't agree more! Great man, B1G Coach of the Year numerous times, super clean program, charities, etc...name building, field house, park, whatever, in his name, but stop this statue sh-t.
I do. But I also would like a new chapter with the same resources. As I’ve stated, we are the iowa hawkeyes, not the iowa ferentz’sYou know you can root for other teams if you’re not happy. We would miss you though.
He has had 7-5 seasons where he had a losing b10 recordwhat school is that?
also what are the b1g schools he has a losing record against?