Odd, why did Senate/House Intel committees, all our Intelligence Agencies all conclude Russia was interfering to help Trump? You'd think if they owned Hillary it'd be the opposite.
Pull up that report and show concrete evidence of interfering to help Trump. Those $54,000 in Facebook ads are equivalent to jaywalking compared to our efforts in '96 to get Yeltsin elected.
From 27 year CIA veteran, Ray McGovern, who furnished the National Intelligence Estimate to GHWB every morning:
The following
excerpts from Henry’s testimony speak for themselves. The dialogue is not a paragon of clarity; but if read carefully, even cyber neophytes can understand:
Ranking Member Mr. [Adam] Schiff: Do you know the date on which the Russians exfiltrated the data from the DNC? … when would that have been?
Mr. Henry: Counsel just reminded me that, as it relates to the DNC, we have indicators that data was exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have no indicators that it was exfiltrated (sic). … There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated,
but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.
Mr. [Chris] Stewart of Utah: Okay. What about the emails that everyone is so, you know, knowledgeable of? Were there also indicators that they were prepared but not evidence that they actually were exfiltrated?
Mr. Henry: There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There’s circumstantial evidence … but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. …
Mr. Stewart: But you have a much lower degree of confidence that this data actually left than you do, for example, that the Russians were the ones who breached the security?
Mr. Henry: There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network.
Mr. Stewart: And circumstantial is less sure than the other evidence you’ve indicated. …
Mr. Henry: “We didn’t have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made.
In answer to a follow-up query on this line of questioning, Henry delivered this classic: “Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn’t see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.”
For two and a half years the House Intelligence Committee knew CrowdStrike didn't have the goods on Russia. Now the public knows too. Twin Pillars of Russiagate Crumble By Ray McGovern Special to Consortium News House Intelligence Committee documents released Thursday reveal that the committee
consortiumnews.com
Adam Schiff kept this secret for 29 months. When it became public, it got zero attention in the press. Kind of important, dontcha think?