It is and it isn't. Tuff trying to explain, but it is like free market with big brother watching over you setting the rules. As I said, Budweiser can not step in and go to a big football school and make a ridiculous offer. Put BUD on the jerseys etc....This is, like, definitionally what somebody is worth. It's literally whatever somebody is willing to pay. That's the Free Market.
I retort. The NCAA has their DNA all over this bad behavior. Please note the NCAA voted, of its own accord, to allow/permit student athletes to receive compensation in exchange for the use of their name, image and likeness. The NCAA did so in order to avoid further litigation relating to copious violation(s) of the Sherman Act (antitrust law).I can see having a ton of issues with things the NCAA does. But, blaming the NCAA for the current mess that is NIL is laughable. They repeatedly warned it would be like this at every single hearing until it was approved. Now, they are taking an "I told you so" approach and I don't blame them one bit.
The NCAA didn't want to be involved in this mess at all and they certainly don't want to be in charge of policing it. As a result, they are waiting for it to truly implode. After that, they still won't do anything until the powers that be, meaning those who made it happen in the first place, essentially come to them begging for a fix. Until that happens, the Wild West is what it is and how it will stay...
Well thought out retort. However, it doesn't change ANYTHING I said. In no way did they want to allow/permit student athletes to receive compensation regarding NIL. You do NOT do something of you own accord, when you are doing it to avoid further litigation. In no way was it voluntary when you are doing it under duress.I retort. The NCAA has their DNA all over this bad behavior. Please note the NCAA voted, of its own accord, to allow/permit student athletes to receive compensation in exchange for the use of their name, image and likeness. The NCAA did so in order to avoid further litigation relating to copious violation(s) of the Sherman Act (antitrust law).
For a brief and concise primer, please see case law: O’Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association; Alston v. NCAA.
Also take note of the case currently making its way through the court system, watch closely; Johnson v. National Collegiate Athletic Association. This case is in the crosshairs of many NCAA officials as it relates to athletes being employees of their respective schools. A view strongly supported by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
Gotta love the naive sweet summer childrenGood thing the university isnt paying them then.
'Sophie's Choice'. Currently a real dilemma of the NCAA's own making.Well thought out retort. However, it doesn't change ANYTHING I said. In no way did they want to allow/permit student athletes to receive compensation regarding NIL. You do NOT do something of you own accord, when you are doing it to avoid further litigation. In no way was it voluntary when you are doing it under duress.
The simple truth is you are arguing that it should have been allowed and it was the NCAA's fault it wasn't already allowed....