Let's think about that for a moment instead of trying to utilize it with no real context 0C.
When I posted that above, it was directly speaking to Toledo being ranked at season's end. Toledo was not even the best team in the MAC; that is indisputable because Toledo did not even appear in the MAC championship game and we all recall how the conference championship game always features the only the best (or at least one of the best) from the old big xii days. So how is it that a team not good enough to play in its own CCG is ranked better than the two teams that did play? Toledo received votes primarily because of the game with Arkansas. Period. End of story.
Penn State on the other hand, faced much better opposition, in general, year in and year out. Over the two decade period that the other ranter selected, Penn State was ranked top 25 (not merely receiving votes) on nine occasions. Huge difference.
Think of it in these terms. Some teams achieve nine or more wins in a season and are viewed very differently depending upon their status. For PSU, nine wins afforded them a 25th, a 24th/25th, a 16th/15th, a17th/15th and a 13th/12th ranking during the specified time frame. Toledo got a few votes for beating Arkansas. Almost reminds one of a major college team only finding nine wins once in a modern football era.......hmmmmm?
I was joking. Relax. Of course rankings mean something. Ohio State didn't play in their conference championship game and they still finished the season ranked higher than both teams that did.
Last edited: