ADVERTISEMENT

Garza foul trouble and use of Ogundele

What will Fran do?

  • Ogundele

    Votes: 5 4.2%
  • Zone

    Votes: 16 13.6%
  • Murray

    Votes: 97 82.2%

  • Total voters
    118
Good job, you got every word correct this time. How many times did you have your mom proof read that for you? I agree with plenty of other posters who have clearly stated that it’s more beneficial to the team to have JO collect fouls instead of Murray. Nobody is asking him to score, just be a big body and don’t allow any easy baskets, I think he could handle that for a couple minutes a game, especially against Nebby!
So, so, so wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SotaHawk87
Well, 5% agree with you while 95% agree with me.
Sorry to keep arguing because I hate when threads get hijacked by a couple jackasses,(you and me) but the question was, what will Fran do, not what we personally think should happen. I voted the same as you but don’t think that’s the best option.
 
Sorry to keep arguing because I hate when threads get hijacked by a couple jackasses,(you and me) but the question was, what will Fran do, not what we personally think should happen. I voted the same as you but don’t think that’s the best option.
All I said was JO is not nearly ready to play real minutes this year (which he obviously isn’t) and you flipped out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KcTo
All I said was JO is not nearly ready to play real minutes this year (which he obviously isn’t) and you flipped out.
I’m curious why you think Ogundele isn’t ready to play minutes?
He’s been playing all year 1st Garza and Nunge, and has had nearly an entire season under his belt as experience.
would you consider 1-2 minutes a half as viable?
 
Nebraska, like some other big10 teams, has 3 centers that they rotate every game and all of them can play...so I imagine that their strategy (again like some other big10 teams) will be to have their 3 guys go at Garza hard hoping to trade fouls...and then they can afford to lose 1 or 2 of those guys to foul trouble....Iowa can't.

I do think Murray or Patrick can stand their own against any of Nebraska's big guys if needed. Against the Illinois center...no way. The loss of Nunge has not that much impact as far as filling a big man void....let's face it Nunge played like a small guy...not a guy 6'11...on offense he roamed outside...on defense he lacked quickness and jumping ability...he usually only was a factor for rebounds that fell right to him.

I agree with earlier post that Nebraska will not be a pushover. Hoiberg has a big roster of transfers he brought in that can at times look very good. How he ever stays below scholarship limits is beyond me.
You really are underestimating Jack’s abilities
 
I’m curious why you think Ogundele isn’t ready to play minutes?
He’s been playing all year 1st Garza and Nunge, and has had nearly an entire season under his belt as experience.
would you consider 1-2 minutes a half as viable?
He’s played 13 minutes the entire season, five fewer than Austin Ash. Kris Murray is a more refined and versatile player, who has played 60 minutes this season. I don’t know how there are people who believe that putting Ogundele in for 5 minutes per game is a better option than having a lineup with Pat/Wieskamp, KrM, and KeM in to spell Garza. You maintain length and rebounding ability on the defensive end while also creating a mismatch on the other end of the court. I’ll take either Keegan or Kris on the perimeter against almost any team’s backup 5 (I highly doubt Fran will have Garza out of the game and leave the backups to face a Kofi Cockburn type of player)

March isn’t the time to start experimenting with an unproven, underdeveloped, project of a player. Of course that’s JMO
 
He’s played 13 minutes the entire season, five fewer than Austin Ash. Kris Murray is a more refined and versatile player, who has played 60 minutes this season. I don’t know how there are people who believe that putting Ogundele in for 5 minutes per game is a better option than having a lineup with Pat/Wieskamp, KrM, and KeM in to spell Garza. You maintain length and rebounding ability on the defensive end while also creating a mismatch on the other end of the court. I’ll take either Keegan or Kris on the perimeter against almost any team’s backup 5 (I highly doubt Fran will have Garza out of the game and leave the backups to face a Kofi Cockburn type of player)

March isn’t the time to start experimenting with an unproven, underdeveloped, project of a player. Of course that’s JMO
@InsaneHawkJJP @herkhatescy
 
nebraska took Illinois to OT in Lincoln and throttled Rutgers.... and Hoiberg totally out coached Fran last year, so that guy can devise a game plan that has the potential to beat a man-down Iowa team

In my view there is still no reason good reason posited here why Ogundele can’t play 1-2 minutes at a time to rest Garza, while protecting Murray from needless exposure to fouls.

Send goons to hack and beat on Garza and athletic Guards to play tight D on our guards. That's the playbook on D. If refs are clueless, like the often are, then it'll be a tight game. Especially if our shooting goes cold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronman
He’s played 13 minutes the entire season, five fewer than Austin Ash. Kris Murray is a more refined and versatile player, who has played 60 minutes this season. I don’t know how there are people who believe that putting Ogundele in for 5 minutes per game is a better option than having a lineup with Pat/Wieskamp, KrM, and KeM in to spell Garza. You maintain length and rebounding ability on the defensive end while also creating a mismatch on the other end of the court. I’ll take either Keegan or Kris on the perimeter against almost any team’s backup 5 (I highly doubt Fran will have Garza out of the game and leave the backups to face a Kofi Cockburn type of player)

March isn’t the time to start experimenting with an unproven, underdeveloped, project of a player. Of course that’s JMO
We did see EJ Liddel back Keegan into the paint for 2 turnaround jumpers on consecutive possessions, and granted EJ is Uber talented, a man with the size and strength of Kockburn will have little to no issue with backing Murray down and dunking right on his fore head.
the question comes, when, not if Garza gets into foul trouble (albeit as defined by Fran) what will Fran do to stop the oppositions powerful centers?
Fran does have the luxury of home games to work out this dilemma and we shall see how he’ll play it before the BTT’s elite teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: InsaneHawkJJP
We did see EJ Liddel back Keegan into the paint for 2 turnaround jumpers on consecutive possessions, and granted EJ is Uber talented, a man with the size and strength of Kockburn will have little to no issue with backing Murray down and dunking right on his fore head.
the question comes, when, not if Garza gets into foul trouble (albeit as defined by Fran) what will Fran do to stop the oppositions powerful centers?
Fran does have the luxury of home games to work out this dilemma and we shall see how he’ll play it before the BTT’s elite teams
Not many big men in the country are as good as Liddell or Cockburn, and Garza doesn’t often get into foul trouble. In the unlikely scenario that Garza is in foul trouble and a high caliber big man like one of those two is in the game, then you crash down on them and make the other team beat you via three ball. Iowa ain’t winning many games without Garza anyways
 
  • Like
Reactions: KcTo
With a decent lead, Josh could get valuable minutes. Until he is able to compete with athletic players, I'd use him sparingly. There's one thing that stands out in my mind about him. I noticed that when he first got into games, he had the propensity to block shots and not just stand there with hands straight up. Maybe he could become a major shot-blocker some day?

Josh’s best role would be as a goon—trying to legit injure someone’s best big (or really any player jumping up in the paint/above the rim)....

AND NO—-i am NOT advocating this John Chaney-like move
 
I wouldn't say that he would play that way and I also don't believe Fran would allow that to happen.
I agree. And my comment I should have said only pertains to this year. So unless we had a sociopathic coach—we don’t, that was an an ALFRAUD time ago—it was purely a provocative way of saying that there isn’t much he can do for us THIS YEAR
 
I agree. And my comment I should have said only pertains to this year. So unless we had a sociopathic coach—we don’t, that was an an ALFRAUD time ago—it was purely a provocative way of saying that there isn’t much he can do for us THIS YEAR
I hear you. He needs to get in the proper shape first before hoisting up the minutes appreciably. I believe he has potential, but it will require conditioning, diet, and devotion to it on his part. Fran and staff will get him there.
 
Keegan and Kris are 6'8" going on 6'9" with good springs and good timing on blocked shots, rebounds, and steals.

That being said, there are some matchups like Kofi and Dickenson where they would have no chance. The Liddell example above is a mini-example.

In those situations I think JO may be needed regardless of how ready he is, and you put him in for a few minutes and see how it goes. You would still double the post whether in man or zone anytime it goes inside, it's just that the opposing big shouldn't be able to catch it as close to the basket as they would with a Murray guarding them. Even with a double team if a big catches it 4 feet from the rim they are just going to turn and shoot over a Murray kid and the double won't have much effect. If they catch it 6 feet away then they have to make a post move and the double team can be effective.

I don't think JO is close to ready. But sometimes it's your best option.
 
Keegan and Kris are 6'8" going on 6'9" with good springs and good timing on blocked shots, rebounds, and steals.

That being said, there are some matchups like Kofi and Dickenson where they would have no chance. The Liddell example above is a mini-example.

In those situations I think JO may be needed regardless of how ready he is, and you put him in for a few minutes and see how it goes. You would still double the post whether in man or zone anytime it goes inside, it's just that the opposing big shouldn't be able to catch it as close to the basket as they would with a Murray guarding them. Even with a double team if a big catches it 4 feet from the rim they are just going to turn and shoot over a Murray kid and the double won't have much effect. If they catch it 6 feet away then they have to make a post move and the double team can be effective.

I don't think JO is close to ready. But sometimes it's your best option.
You’ll just have to trust Fran, because well his decision is the only one that matters, lol
 
You’ll just have to trust Fran, because well his decision is the only one that matters, lol

I do think that if Iowa only needs to rest Garza for 1-2 minutes about 2 to 3 times a game, that they won't use JO in those situations. However, if Garza got a 2nd foul with 10 minutes left in the first half then that's a totally different situation and they may need to consider it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24 so far and KcTo
Not many big men in the country are as good as Liddell or Cockburn, and Garza doesn’t often get into foul trouble. In the unlikely scenario that Garza is in foul trouble and a high caliber big man like one of those two is in the game, then you crash down on them and make the other team beat you via three ball. Iowa ain’t winning many games without Garza anyways
agree. and agree.
However, Garza played only 28 minutes owing to fouls trouble v Cockburn at ILlinois so history would suggest that there is a significant risk in foul trouble v ILlinois in any potential rematch.
 
I do think that if Iowa only needs to rest Garza for 1-2 minutes about 2 to 3 times a game, that they won't use JO in those situations. However, if Garza got a 2nd foul with 10 minutes left in the first half then that's a totally different situation and they may need to consider it.
What if foul prone Murray has 2 fouls in 1st half and Garza needs a rest?
 
I do think that if Iowa only needs to rest Garza for 1-2 minutes about 2 to 3 times a game, that they won't use JO in those situations. However, if Garza got a 2nd foul with 10 minutes left in the first half then that's a totally different situation and they may need to consider it.
If Garza gets a second foul with 10 minutes to go in the first half of pretty much any game from here on out, then Fran is going to have to seriously reevaluate his two foul rule and trust Luka not to pick up the third
 
I do think that if Iowa only needs to rest Garza for 1-2 minutes about 2 to 3 times a game, that they won't use JO in those situations. However, if Garza got a 2nd foul with 10 minutes left in the first half then that's a totally different situation and they may need to consider it.
And Fran needs to be more deliberate with his rests. Like many coaches, he'll make a substitution and right after there's a TV timeout, but he'll keep the same lineup out there after the break. That 2-3 minute rest should be viewed as 'bench time' as much as actual time on bench for Garza. It's very nitpicky but this will matter if Iowa has to play Illinois or Michigan again where Fran now has less lineup flexibility without Nunge.

Also agreed with your earlier point about Ogundele. Fran may be forced to play him in limited minutes against teams with big bodies if Garza is in foul trouble. Either Murray twin or Josh is a bad matchup against Dickinson or Kofi so the key will be on team defense to make it more difficult to get the ball in the post.
 
There is no way Ogundele gets a single minute this season in a big game unless guys go down with injury.
 
Playing Murray 1-1 with Kofi for example would only do 3 things:

1. Get Murray in foul trouble
2. Get Kofi shots from right on top of the rim
3. Double the number of offensive rebounds Kofi gets

The defense could try to double him PRIOR to the catch by having someone front and back him, but then you are giving up wide open 3's or weak side layups probably.

As bad as Ogundele is (and I share the sentiment that he is probably really rough) he's the only guy besides Garza capable of pushing Kofi out to 6 feet on the post catch, and blocking him out on other players shots. I'm huge on Murray and very skeptical of Ogundele, but even I would consider giving him minutes in certain situations. We don't care if he fouls out, for example. Maybe it wouldn't work because he's even worse than anticipated, but I'm not sure any of us on this board know enough to be certain either way.
 
  • Love
Reactions: KcTo
What if foul prone Murray has 2 fouls in 1st half and Garza needs a rest?

Another tough scenario. I would probably play Murray with 2 fouls before I'd play Garza with 2, so I'd probably keep Murray in and go zone or have the double come sooner on post entry so that it's less likely he would get a 3rd foul.

Another option is just to have Fran go off on Bo Boroski and get a T just to chew up 2 or 3 minutes until Garza is rested :). I've seen coaches "accidentally" spill water on the court for this purpose, or perhaps a guy get injured, that type of stuff. Somewhat unethical unless you consider gamesmanship like that fair play, but if we're playing Illinois I'm ok with it!
 
Another tough scenario. I would probably play Murray with 2 fouls before I'd play Garza with 2, so I'd probably keep Murray in and go zone or have the double come sooner on post entry so that it's less likely he would get a 3rd foul.

Another option is just to have Fran go off on Bo Boroski and get a T just to chew up 2 or 3 minutes until Garza is rested :). I've seen coaches "accidentally" spill water on the court for this purpose, or perhaps a guy get injured, that type of stuff. Somewhat unethical unless you consider gamesmanship like that fair play, but if we're playing Illinois I'm ok with it!
#1 lol at the delay tactic, but with more ‘further review‘ time stop, use of TV timeouts, and other coach-related time stoppages, you can certainly see how Garza could get more rests.
#2. Murray is fouls prone and asking him to guard any of the true centers at NE, WI, IL, or MI is going To result in more fouls
#3. Under no circumstances go zone against any big team team that can shoot 3’s. zone is simply not an option, especially win you remove Garza from rebounding

therefore #2-3 aren’t going to turn out well
 
Playing Murray 1-1 with Kofi for example would only do 3 things:

1. Get Murray in foul trouble
2. Get Kofi shots from right on top of the rim
3. Double the number of offensive rebounds Kofi gets

The defense could try to double him PRIOR to the catch by having someone front and back him, but then you are giving up wide open 3's or weak side layups probably.

As bad as Ogundele is (and I share the sentiment that he is probably really rough) he's the only guy besides Garza capable of pushing Kofi out to 6 feet on the post catch, and blocking him out on other players shots. I'm huge on Murray and very skeptical of Ogundele, but even I would consider giving him minutes in certain situations. We don't care if he fouls out, for example. Maybe it wouldn't work because he's even worse than anticipated, but I'm not sure any of us on this board know enough to be certain either way.
And what's the worst that can happen playing JO. A guy like Kofi scores a couple buckets ? Probably gonna happen anyway without Garza.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT