ADVERTISEMENT

Governors have little power to block refugees

Do you not know what "Nationality" means?

"Nationality affords the state jurisdiction over the person and affords the person the protection of the state..The noun national can include both citizens and non-citizens.."

Seems to me that this would cover refugees quite well.

Where does it say Nationality?? I see Naturalization which is defined in what you posted as the legal act or process by which a NON CITIZEN may acquire CITZENSHIP.

You linked the thing, did you not read it? Basically congress makes the rules on how to become a citizen is what it says.
 
Islam does not teach its followers to go out and kill hundreds of innocent people. Try again.

Are you familiar with Wahhabi schools? I think it's a chicken vs. egg thing with liberal pacifists. Do you guys start out completely ignorant and simple minded, or do you become that way when you are brainwashed in?

Wahhabism to ISIS: how Saudi Arabia exported the main source of global terrorism
Although IS is certainly an Islamic movement, it is neither typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th century.
 
Let's go back to the original post:
You said - Muslims didn't attack Paris. Jihadists did.
I gave you the definition of a Jihadist straight from the dictionary (which you still won't\can't deny). This refuted your claim of a Muslim not being a Jihadist.

Now you switch lanes and say I am claiming Islam teaches "X" - please point out where I said Islam teaches anything... You can't (you are creating that in your own mind).
Perhaps "Jihadists" wasn't a good technical term. But "terrorist" is. And that's what these people are: Terrorists. They don't represent Islam. They only represent their own misguided views.

Why are you so desperate to connect Muslims to these people?
 
Where does it say Nationality?? I see Naturalization which is the defined in what you posted as the legal act or process by which a NON CITIZEN may acquire CITZENSHIP.

You linked the thing, did you not read it? Basically congress makes the rules on how to become a citizen is what it says.
Obviously you didn't read your own post. I'll help you since it's obvious you need it. Here's your post copied here. "Nationality" is in red in case you're color blind. It clearly covers both citizens and non-citizens.

"Article I, section 8, clause 4 of the United States Constitution expressly gives the United States Congress the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.

Naturalization (or naturalisation) is the legal act or process by which a non-citizen in a country may acquire citizenship or nationality of that country.

This is about citizenship. It does not address non citizens and refugees."
 
Are you familiar with Wahhabi schools? I think it's a chicken vs. egg thing with liberal pacifists. Do you guys start out completely ignorant and simple minded, or do you become that way when you are brainwashed in?

Wahhabism to ISIS: how Saudi Arabia exported the main source of global terrorism
Although IS is certainly an Islamic movement, it is neither typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th century.
The hate is flowing through you with this post. Show me the part of the Koran that instructs its followers to murder innocent people. This is the second time I've asked now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Can I take some quotes from the Left's candidates and say they are all of your opinions as well?

You always operate in absolutes/black and white. It has to be exhausting for you and the people who try to love you.
Someone's mad that they got their own words thrown back at them. I guess the party of "responsibility" won't take responsibility for their own words.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Obviously you didn't read your own post. I'll help you since it's obvious you need it. Here's your post copied here. "Nationality" is in red in case you're color blind. It clearly covers both citizens and non-citizens.

"Article I, section 8, clause 4 of the United States Constitution expressly gives the United States Congress the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.

Naturalization (or naturalisation) is the legal act or process by which a non-citizen in a country may acquire citizenship or nationality of that country.

This is about citizenship. It does not address non citizens and refugees."


I stand corrected, however you just dug a deeper hole. The state has jurisdiction and not the Feds in this case. The state is required by the constitution to give protection of the state. So the Governors do have the right to say we won't take any refugees to protect the citizens of their state. Thanks for pointing that out.

Nationality is the legal relationship between a person and a state.[1] Nationality affords the state jurisdiction over the person and affords the person the protection of the state. What these rights and duties are vary from state to state.[2]
 
The hate is flowing through you with this post. Show me the part of the Koran that instructs its followers to murder innocent people. This is the second time I've asked now.

EVERY TERRORIST SINCE 9/11 has been Muslim. Just a coincidence, i guess? Tell me, what do they teach in those schools (second time I've asked). How do they feel about Christians? I suppose government figures follow the letter of the law, right? So there's no corruption? Guess what, perception is reality. Muslim terrorists are driven by the current culture of religion.

The hate flows freely through you in that you are constantly trying to thwart attempts to get to the root of this terrorism by blaming Christians and victims. At this point, I think you must be a christian hating Muslim or just a troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
Perhaps "Jihadists" wasn't a good technical term. But "terrorist" is. And that's what these people are: Terrorists. They don't represent Islam. They only represent their own misguided views.

Why are you so desperate to connect Muslims to these people?
Because they shout Allah Akbar as they kill.

To try and separate these guys as terrorist with nothing to do with Islam is like trying to separate the guy that killed the abortion doctor from Christianity. Neither represent more than a very very small percentage of their religion but they do have a religious belief to what they do.
 
Perhaps "Jihadists" wasn't a good technical term. But "terrorist" is. And that's what these people are: Terrorists. They don't represent Islam. They only represent their own misguided views.

Why are you so desperate to connect Muslims to these people?
7e7f3ee9a1df83b2889c50f14fb27029553ced963d5ebfcbb89097eaf38bfded.jpg
 
EVERY TERRORIST SINCE 9/11 has been Muslim. Just a coincidence, i guess? Tell me, what do they teach in those schools (second time I've asked). How do they feel about Christians? I suppose government figures follow the letter of the law, right? So there's no corruption? Guess what, perception is reality. Muslim terrorists are driven by the current culture of religion.

The hate flows freely through you in that you are constantly trying to thwart attempts to get to the root of this terrorism by blaming Christians and victims. At this point, I think you must be a christian hating Muslim or just a troll.

I anxiously await your comprehensive list of every terrorist attack on this planet since 9/11 including the perpetrator's religious affiliation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/still-sleepwalking-toward-armageddon

Sam Harris - Still Sleepwalking Toward Armageddon

Islam is the fundamental problem. Not all Muslims are bad, there are plenty of moderate ones that don't condone this crap. But the problem is that many, if not a majority, have no problem with it. Islam is stuck in the dark ages. You don't see other religions doing this same crap. As a liberal, I get tired of seeing other liberals run to the defense of this religion anytime its followers do something like this.
 
If the right doesn't hate brown people, they're sure doing a poor job expressing that belief. You leading candidates have literally said that Muslims shouldn't be in the White House and have accused Mexicans of being rapists. These aren't just average nutbags. These are your two leading Presidential candidates. How do you expect us to take such comments?
As a die hard independent, I'd like to use the term "our" leading candidates. Because the Democrat fruitcakes are equally as deranged. I DON'T HAVE A GOOD CHOICE FOR WHOM TO VOTE!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TexMichFan
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT