Kyle, I wish you would start your women's game thread over here on the free board, instead of the Lounge.
That's a nice assist by Ediger. She had another one at the 6:18 mark in the 4th quarter, the one I talked about. That's after Nebraska took their first lead of the game after an Iowa inbound miscue. Down to the other end of the court, Ediger grabbed the rebound from a Clark miss and immediately passed to Martin for 3 to retake the lead. Ediger to Martin for 3, Iowa needs more of those!YES!! She had some nice sharp inside-out passes.
I may have to start doing it over here, so everyone on the board can see it.Kyle, I wish you would start your women's game thread over here on the free board, instead of the Lounge.
Great win. Good to see them get some rhythm and make shots. The defense has been marginally improved this year but it didn't matter when they collectively couldn't make 3's. Against good teams if they can just not get dominated on the glass, they stand a good chance when they are clicking offensively.That was a huge road win for the Hawks as Kyle's article points out. The shooting was great, especially from long range.... Warnock was on fire.
The ladies will need this type of shooting performance for wins if they continue to be sloppy with the ball and allow their opponents to dominate the boards - 23 ORBs for Nebraska... holy smokes they will get creamed by the more experienced teams in the league unless they tighten that up significantly.
Amy Williams is building Nebraska into a contender - this is tuning into a hot rivalry match-up and the players on both sides seemed to have a little extra emotional energy. Can't wait for the re-match.
Illini haven't won in Iowa City since 2007. It would be a shame to not get to play that game.Schedule changes for Iowa women's hoops
Iowa Women’s basketball announced that Sunday’s matchup against Nebraska at Carver-Hawkeye Arena has been changed fromiowa.rivals.com
Hopefully, we can get it scheduled in somewhere. We might have to play back-to-back days at some point but that's no different from the Big Ten Tournament so might as well prepare now.Illini haven't won in Iowa City since 2007. It would be a shame to not get to play that game.
Sad but not necessarily a surprise.We’ve been dropped from the rankings
It's not the offensive scheme, it's effort that's the problem. There was a lot of standing around again vs Nebraska. Our players have been slow to go up and get it. There's a lot of ball watching going on and not a lot of blocking out or jumping/extending for the ball.Part of our rebounding problem is scheme. We want to run a fast break and crash with fewer players expecting to get the d rebound and be behind their defense for easier scores. That's great and part of our game but both Nortwestern and Nebraska went and got way too many O rebounds. We still won at Nebraska as they converted very poorly on second chance despite those 21 extra possessions, while Northwestern converted the difference in score on theirs.
Thinking about this team going to NIT and not the NCAA tourney with a player like Caitlin Clark is wild to meIt's not the offensive scheme, it's effort that's the problem. There was a lot of standing around again vs Nebraska. Our players have been slow to go up and get it. There's a lot of ball watching going on and not a lot of blocking out or jumping/extending for the ball.
I will see Clark go up and get it but not many others. Players need to be more active, even if means we end up getting more over the back calls. Making the opponent earn it from the line is better than giving up second, third, fourth chance points and wearing down the players. You're much more likely to give up 3s with more opportunities.
Fortunately, the D had some very good moments and the offense was clicking most of the night. But we could have very easily lost. We also gave up steals inbounding the ball. Despite the win, more effort and focus will be needed going forward if we want to get back to the tourney.
I'm not convinced yet we are a tourney team until the rebounding woes and turnovers are addressed.
Little Sister frustration? Anneka Stewart probably didn't feel very good either.If you've got the game on tape, check out Kendall Coley at 7:26 left in the game. Should have got kicked out of the game. She's dirty dirty.
I think my point is more what does Iowa missing the NCAA Tournament actually look like? Assuming we get the Illinois game in, we have 15 games left. 4 are against Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois, and Wisconsin, all of whom are terrible. Even a bad version of Iowa should beat all of those teams.I think it's fair to say that both Gabe and Braydon are correct. On one hand, if the regular season were suddenly over today, we'd have done enough to qualify for an at large bid. But the season is not over today, and shooting 58% from three while giving up soooo many extra possession on turnovers and poor rebounding is not a sustainable way to keep winning. We're not going to be a great team at either, but it needs to improve somewhat.
She was playing dirty in the second half of the Nebraska/Michigan game as well. Big red flag.If you've got the game on tape, check out Kendall Coley at 7:26 left in the game. Should have got kicked out of the game. She's dirty dirty.
I mean, yeah, point taken, but let's not count our hawks before they hatch, so to speak. If we give up 23 offensive rebounds plus the significant turnover margin in some of those games you are already chalking up in the W column, things can still very quickly go the other way. All I'm saying is there is merit in what Gabe is saying.I think my point is more what does Iowa missing the NCAA Tournament actually look like? Assuming we get the Illinois game in, we have 15 games left. 4 are against Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois, and Wisconsin, all of whom are terrible. Even a bad version of Iowa should beat all of those teams.
We play a further 3 games against teams that probably won't make the NCAA Tournament (Purdue and Minnesota x2). Iowa could lose any of those games, but realistically should go at least 2-1 in them.
Finally, Iowa plays 8 more games against likely NCAA Tournament teams (Nebraska, Indiana x2, Northwestern, Ohio State, Michigan x2, and Maryland). 5 of those games are at home. And while Iowa could absolutely lose to any of those teams, a loss against one of them doesn't hurt Iowa's resume much. If we go 0-8 or 1-7 in those games, we might miss the NCAA Tournament. But that seems pretty unlikely, especially with 5 of them at home.
I just think it's more of a worst case scenario than a likely outcome. Maybe I'm just an optimist, but I think it's a lot more likely that Clark finally starts hitting shots and we revert back to being a Sweet 16 contender.She was playing dirty in the second half of the Nebraska/Michigan game as well. Big red flag.
I mean, yeah, point taken, but let's not count our hawks before they hatch, so to speak. If we give up 23 offensive rebounds plus the significant turnover margin in some of those games you are already chalking up in the W column, things can still very quickly go the other way. All I'm saying is there is merit in what Gabe is saying.
Can we make the tournament? Absolutely. Will we make the tournament? It's probable. Could we miss the tournament? It's possible.I think my point is more what does Iowa missing the NCAA Tournament actually look like? Assuming we get the Illinois game in, we have 15 games left. 4 are against Penn State, Rutgers, Illinois, and Wisconsin, all of whom are terrible. Even a bad version of Iowa should beat all of those teams.
We play a further 3 games against teams that probably won't make the NCAA Tournament (Purdue and Minnesota x2). Iowa could lose any of those games, but realistically should go at least 2-1 in them.
Finally, Iowa plays 8 more games against likely NCAA Tournament teams (Nebraska, Indiana x2, Northwestern, Ohio State, Michigan x2, and Maryland). 5 of those games are at home. And while Iowa could absolutely lose to any of those teams, a loss against one of them doesn't hurt Iowa's resume much. If we go 0-8 or 1-7 in those games, we might miss the NCAA Tournament. But that seems pretty unlikely, especially with 5 of them at home.
Does anyone got a clip of it?If you've got the game on tape, check out Kendall Coley at 7:26 left in the game. Should have got kicked out of the game. She's dirty dirty.
If you have BTN+, you can watch full replays of any BTN/BTN+ game there.Does anyone got a clip of it?
The replay quality is not really good. I wasn't able to see what took place. But you can see the Haiby elbow that was called a common foul. No way that's a common foul. Haiby elbowed Marshall in the head. It looked pretty intentional. Haiby should have been ejected from the game.If you have BTN+, you can watch full replays of any BTN/BTN+ game there.
I was pretty shocked they didn’t take a look at that play. I agree she may not have hit her hard, but she definitely forcefully threw that elbow up high.The replay quality is not really good. I wasn't able to see what took place. But you can see the Haiby elbow that was called a common foul. No way that's a common foul. Haiby elbowed Marshall in the head. It looked pretty intentional. Haiby should have been ejected from the game.
I believe the refs did take a look, but in the end didn't call it an intentional foul.