I agree Braydon the bigger the game the more minutes a few of the starters will play. But it is nice to have quality depth that can come in & get things done too. Warnock will play a lot because she rebounds well & is ideal in the Iowa offense at spacing the floor with her 3-pt shooting. Stuelke gives them a different athlete at that position forcing teams to hopefully have to game plan for her 10-15 minutes she'll likely get. I don't think Ediger was in the best of shape last season which is why we saw her at the 5, that's likely where she stays unless Iowa uses a few double post sets at times/situational.My proposed rotation was for the big games. If we're up big, I hope Coach Bluder pulls Clark much earlier now that we have another player (Davis) who can reliably get the ball up. Otherwise, Clark is playing 35 minutes plus in the big games. Her stamina is an underrated part of her game.
If Stuelke is good enough to contribute well I'm fine with Warnock playing less than 30 minutes. That's far from a given, though. Ediger was rated similarly to Stuelke on ESPN. At this time last year, most (myself included) thought she would be the backup 4. Clearly that didn't happen. Warnock has averaged 30+ minutes the last two years and has been our third best player in both years.
As this past season progressed Kate Martin advanced the ball & initiated the offense quite a bit more giving Caitlin a break. They kept the ball in Caitlin's hands more against teams like Indiana & NW where each had a guard who was a defensive menace.
Caitlin doesn't need the ball in her hands to score or be effective, she played the 2 on team USA last summer & was the tournament MVP in the U-19's. With Davis on board & based on what she has done in the past (against Iowa too) no reason to think we won't see that for a few minutes even if (Davis) isn't the quality of player on team USA. Having teams chase Caitlin off screens for a few extra minutes each game isn't a bad thing.