ADVERTISEMENT

Hawkeye Women's Hoop season

Gabbie Marshall made me look good tonight with my user name😆 she was on fuego...
 
Its just so much more irritating because they got by with so many uncalled really obvious fouls.
I just really worry about injuries. Our entire starting lineup went to the floor at least once. Martin was assaulted. Marshall tripped and poked in the eye. Czinano was tackled on that jump ball. And Clark almost didn't get up in the 2nd quarter
 
It really seems this team is peaking at the absolutely right time. Their offense always seems to find a way to be productive and tonight it was behind Marshall's 3 barrage. But the defensive improvements have been what this team needed.

Rutgers was noticeably frustrated in the 1H and it clearly affected their play. Iowa had their typically good defense confused and it snowballed for them allowing Iowa to get that big halftime lead.

Beat MSU and who knows what can happen. Improving seeding improves Iowa's chances in the Rd of 32 too if they make it there. Playing a 3 over a 2 could be the difference between playing a beatable Indiana or a daunting challenge in South Carolina.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
It really seems this team is peaking at the absolutely right time. Their offense always seems to find a way to be productive and tonight it was behind Marshall's 3 barrage. But the defensive improvements have been what this team needed.

Rutgers was noticeably frustrated in the 1H and it clearly affected their play. Iowa had their typically good defense confused and it snowballed for them allowing Iowa to get that big halftime lead.

Beat MSU and who knows what can happen. Improving seeding improves Iowa's chances in the Rd of 32 too if they make it there. Playing a 3 over a 2 could be the difference between playing a beatable Indiana or a daunting challenge in South Carolina.
A really good win for us indeed! Let's not get tired yet ladies!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hagarwood
Racially motivated?
Yes, commenting player X or Y 'looks like a man' or 'looks masculine' seems to only be said about black players. Interesting how that works right? If the way the Rutgers women played on the court upset you, that's one thing. If their appearances upset you, then maybe you have some things to reflect on. Also, Don Imus pretty much said the same stupid thing decades ago about Rutgers, so your ignorance is very fitting tonight.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: DewHawk and littlez
Holy virtue signaling, batman! You're truly a 21st century fit-in.
BTW, he never mentioned race.
Yes I'm virtue signaling with my anonymous identity to other anonymous people on an Iowa forum.

Don Imus didn't mention race either. He was called out for his comments because they were... racist. If the Rutgers players' appearances make you uncomfortable where you need to make fun of them, then maybe you should focus on why you're uncomfortable.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: DewHawk and littlez
Yes, commenting player X or Y 'looks like a man' or 'looks masculine' seems to only be said about black players. Interesting how that works right? If the way the Rutgers women played on the court upset you, that's one thing. If their appearances upset you, then maybe you have some things to reflect on. Also, Don Imus pretty much said the same stupid thing decades ago about Rutgers, so your ignorance is very fitting tonight.
Damn, all my Sinead O'Connor jokes went right down the shitter! Who knew? LOL!
 
Yes I'm virtue signaling with my anonymous identity to other anonymous people on an Iowa forum.

Don Imus didn't mention race either. He was called out for his comments because they were... racist. If the Rutgers players' appearances make you uncomfortable where you need to make fun of them, then maybe you should focus on why you're uncomfortable.
Imus didn't mention race (nothing he said even pointed in that direction), yet his comments were racist. Oooookay....

News flash: these days, anyone who says something an elite ideologue doesn't like is almost reflexively referred to as "racist" by said ideologue & his widdo fwends.
 
Imus didn't mention race (nothing he said even pointed in that direction), yet his comments were racist. Oooookay....

News flash: these days, anyone who says something an elite ideologue doesn't like is almost reflexively referred to as "racist" by said ideologue & his widdo fwends.
Imus literally slandered the Rutgers team by calling them "nappy headed hoes". You have to have zero understanding of modern western culture and hip hop to know there are two terms there that are clearly associated with black culture and slang. Also, Imus literally apologized because those comments were viewed as racist and sexist. If you're making comments in the same light as his, slandering the same freaking team the same way he did, then maybe that's why you'd receive backlash too if you said that in public. But you won't say those comments in public because you're an anonymous fool on a message board.

Again if you're trying to do a lame Imus bit, first understand the bit! Imus was always terrible, you should have listened to O&A.
 
Well this thread spiraled quickly...

Anyway, Iowa only has to beat the 7 seed to make the championship game. Huge upset win tonight, keep up the momentum!
 
Imus literally slandered the Rutgers team by calling them "nappy headed hoes". You have to have zero understanding of modern western culture and hip hop to know there are two terms there that are clearly associated with black culture and slang. Also, Imus literally apologized because those comments were viewed as racist and sexist. If you're making comments in the same light as his, slandering the same freaking team the same way he did, then maybe that's why you'd receive backlash too if you said that in public. But you won't say those comments in public because you're an anonymous fool on a message board.

Again if you're trying to do a lame Imus bit, first understand the bit! Imus was always terrible, you should have listened to O&A.
Nice try, but another swing & miss. Guess what; if you're looking to be offended, you'll find a way to get offended.
 
What's really impressive about the ladies' win is that for a second straight game, someone other than Caitlin Clark led them in scoring. On a side note, Clark led the nation in scoring, but didn't get 1st team AA??
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyberhawk
Yes, commenting player X or Y 'looks like a man' or 'looks masculine' seems to only be said about black players. Interesting how that works right? If the way the Rutgers women played on the court upset you, that's one thing. If their appearances upset you, then maybe you have some things to reflect on. Also, Don Imus pretty much said the same stupid thing decades ago about Rutgers, so your ignorance is very fitting tonight.
Uh, no. Stop reading into and trying to make it racial. I don’t even know who Don Imus is and I’m not going to waste my time looking him up. There are plenty of lighter skinned women who are built like men. It’s not their fault.
 
Hey Don Imus, pick some other content beyond racially motivated garbage to rant about so everyone else here can continue talking about the Iowa women's basketball season.
No intention to turn into a rant - simply one comment/question to another's related post.

But, I should have just left it alone in the first place.

Edit: after reading a few previous posts by you; jesus man...it isn't racist JUST BECAUSE the human being(s) have black skin.

THE SAME INITIAL COMMENT [by Mepo?] WOULD HAVE BEEN MADE IF THE BALL PLAYER HAD WHITE SKIN AND LOOKED VERY MASCULINE.
 
Last edited:
Did I miss something? Did Imus play for Rutgers last night? Why are we wasting space discussing what he said 10 years ago? As for C Viv., I will always have great respect and appreciation for what she did for Hawkeye WBB, but she is responsible for the team she puts on the court. If the majority of women's college basketball teams conducted themselves as Rutgers did last night, it would dramatically reduce the popularity of the sport... I would not watch, for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 138clhawk
No intention to turn into a rant - simply one comment/question to another's related post.

But, I should have just left it alone in the first place.

Edit: after reading a few previous posts by you; jesus man...it isn't racist JUST BECAUSE the human being(s) have black skin.

THE SAME INITIAL COMMENT [by Mepo?] WOULD HAVE BEEN MADE IF THE BALL PLAYER HAD WHITE SKIN AND LOOKED VERY MASCULINE.
"Hey I reject your claims of racism, but I'll take two orders of sexism please. Thank you." I like how you all presume intent of other crap posters' crude comments, but my presumption is clearly wrong even though similar racial comments were made years ago by a national voice, and the notion of making fun of 'masculine' looking black women is a common racial insult that is prevalent over the internet. If you're ignorant of Imus and ignorant of the internet hate, then own that ignorance and hopefully you learned something new today. The only thing I'm offended by is really bad humor. And if you're upset I used the 'r' word, then don't make a comment that most people outside of anonymous forums would view as borderline 'r'-worded. 2020 Iowa football scandal really opened up some insecurities huh?

//end rant

Michigan State will be a tough test. Iowa has played two physical teams back to back and MSU will be another one. Warnock and Martin should be good to go and MSU is as banged up. Clark should be the deciding factor here. I think she steps up and drives this team into the finals.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DewHawk
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT