No.It was a simple question.
Do you think Rutgers wins that game slightly less than 1 out of 3 times?
Just to be clear, your rationale for "winning" tonight's bet is banking on Rutgers and Kansas State playing 3 more times?
Lolololol.
No.It was a simple question.
Do you think Rutgers wins that game slightly less than 1 out of 3 times?
NoNo.
Just to be clear, your rationale for "winning" tonight's bet is banking on Rutgers and Kansas State playing 3 more times?
Lolololol.
He lost his money tonight, but in his mind he won the bet because theoretically if Rutgers and Kansas St. play 3 more times Rutgers can lose 2 and almost 3 of those games and he'll end up winning in the long run.How did that one work out?
You don't even have the math right.He lost his money tonight, but in his mind he won the bet because theoretically if Rutgers and Kansas St. play 3 more times Rutgers can lose 2 and almost 3 of those games and he'll end up winning in the long run.
Lol.
Understand the thread?Nahhhh, not me dude
You bet $$$ on Rutgers tonight v. Kansas St., you lost that bet and lost that $$$, but you're on here saying you made the right bet.You don't even have the math right.
You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Greenway4prez seems at least fluent in sports betting concepts. It won't be long until he comes in and clears things up, since nobody would dare listen to a guy that gives the benefit of the doubt to coaches rather than message boarders
Correct.You bet $$$ on Rutgers tonight v. Kansas St., you lost that bet and lost that $$$, but you're on here saying you made the right bet.
Lol.
wow, this is reaching the level of stupidity not sure was possible. You are something elseHow surprising is this?
Same guys that argue into KF 's field of expertise are arguing into my field of expertise.
I guarantee I don't know shit about your guys' field of expertise
Agree 1,000% but I don't want to lose him, it's just too funny.Lol OP... never change. Self righteous dbag
Makes a post trying to prove some kind of point. Doubles down on his stupidity. Loses his bet. Tries to convince everyone that his bet was actually smart bc he would win in the long run. Gets called out repeatedly. Then claims everyone is actually wrong bc they don't understand.
What a dipshit
How long have you been sports betting?Lol OP... never change. Self righteous dbag
Makes a post trying to prove some kind of point. Doubles down on his stupidity. Loses his bet. Tries to convince everyone that his bet was actually smart bc he would win in the long run. Gets called out repeatedly. Then claims everyone is actually wrong bc they don't understand.
What a dipshit
As long as there are out of line fans, you will never lose me.Agree 1,000% but I don't want to lose him, it's just too funny.
Rutgers was 0-1 tonight. They're not playing the game 3 times.It was a simple question.
Do you think Rutgers wins that game slightly less than 1 out of 3 times?
I believe that bet to have had an edge vs the juice in the long run as well.The correct pick was to take Rutgers and the points.
And tell me about your sports betting career.Rutgers was 0-1 tonight. They're not playing the game 3 times.
That's all that matters.
Why do you hate winning and like losing money?
LOL at dude running his mouth about a bet he makes, losing, and then trying to convince everyone how awesome he is at sports gambling. LOL.
Stick to your dumbass "8-4" and "run the ball" posts.
Makes sense considering how much of this board are idiotsThis guy has to be the most ignored poster on this board.
Simple:And tell me about your sports betting career.
Clearly not much, as you clearly don't get it either
Well said!Simple:
When I win a bet, I get $. When I don't win a bet, I lose $.
I don't pretend that my losing bets are really winning bets because they should have won at least 1 out of 3 times.
You think if I use a bunch of gambling buzz-words on this board that it will impress everyone?
LOL
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Makes sense considering how much of this board are idiots
Why do you guys think I phrased attached thread as such before the game ever ended?41-29 Rutgers with the ball in the 4th.
Like their chances.
Love my chances on the ML+220😂
… Says the guy who created a thread in attempt to make a case about strength of the Big 10, using a game where they lost to the Big 12.Makes sense considering how much of this board are idiots
I would bet a lot of money you aren't a winning sports bettor over timeSimple:
When I win a bet, I get $. When I don't win a bet, I lose $.
I don't pretend that my losing bets are really winning bets because they should have won at least 1 out of 3 times.
You think if I use a bunch of gambling buzz-words on this board that it will impress everyone?
LOL
And if you read post #20 in this thread, the point remains… Says the guy who created a thread in attempt to make a case about strength of the Big 10, using a game where they lost to the Big 12.
I would "like" to know why you think you won a bet that you lost.Why do you guys think I phrased attached thread as such before the game ever ended?
"Like" Rutgers chances to win.
"Love" my chances vs the +220 odds.
Rutgers and I are not playing the same game. They have to beat K St. I have to beat the odds. Same concept as a point spread
I would bet even more that you aren'tI would bet a lot of money you aren't a winning sports bettor over time
Read better and/or apply 3rd grade math.I would "like" to know why you think you won a bet that you lost.
I "love" watching you get destroyed in this thread.
I would bet even more that you aren't
Lol, you're a guy who hands away $$$ and then tries to get everyone to believe you were handed $$$.Read better and/or apply 3rd grade math.
I don't expect you guys to understand sports betting.
But this board has to have some of the least credible posts on the internet.
But that's football fans for you. And I've been saying this for decades
I'm not trying to get anybody to believe anything.Lol, you're a guy who hands away $$$ and then tries to get everyone to believe you were handed $$$.
Just so funny. Please never leave.
Obviously.I'm not trying to get anybody to believe anything.
Only defending against ignorant attacks.
If you want to start paying for my long-term winners, I'll start the convincing
Just hear me out – don’t you think that when you’ve gotten to the point that you feel like you need to explain the game of football AND sports gambling to guys on a sports message board, that maybe YOU are the one who lacks credibility?Read better and/or apply 3rd grade math.
I don't expect you guys to understand sports betting.
But this board has to have some of the least credible posts on the internet.
But that's football fans for you. And I've been saying this for decades
Why do you guys think I phrased attached thread as such before the game ever ended?
"Like" Rutgers chances to win.
"Love" my chances vs the +220 odds.
Rutgers and I are not playing the same game. They have to beat K St. I have to beat the odds. Same concept as a point spread
No, that’s spot on.Do I gotta be on drugs for this thread to make sense? So dude says two other teams bowl results are what we should base Iowa's season on last year, even though Iowa actually got the shit kicked out of them in their bowl game 35-0. Then carries that over into this season based on the first half results of a bowl game of a team Iowa didn't even play. That team then blows a lead, dude loses a bet, but then doubles down on it saying he that even though he literally lost money, he didn't really lose the bet. Then basically calls everyone else an idiot. Am I missing anything?
The guy is broken, mentally speaking. You can even see him begging to visit other threads he's spazzing out in as well. Better to just put him on ignore and laugh at his posts. Trying to reason with him or even argue his points results in a confusing word salad.Do I gotta be on drugs for this thread to make sense? So dude says two other teams bowl results are what we should base Iowa's season on last year, even though Iowa actually got the shit kicked out of them in their bowl game 35-0. Then carries that over into this season based on the first half results of a bowl game of a team Iowa didn't even play. That team then blows a lead, dude loses a bet, but then doubles down on it saying he that even though he literally lost money, he didn't really lose the bet. Then basically calls everyone else an idiot. Am I missing anything?