ADVERTISEMENT

Here we go again

He lost his money tonight, but in his mind he won the bet because theoretically if Rutgers and Kansas St. play 3 more times Rutgers can lose 2 and almost 3 of those games and he'll end up winning in the long run.

Lol.
You don't even have the math right.

You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Greenway4prez seems at least fluent in sports betting concepts. It won't be long until he comes in and clears things up, since nobody would dare listen to a guy that gives the benefit of the doubt to coaches rather than message boarders
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
You don't even have the math right.

You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Greenway4prez seems at least fluent in sports betting concepts. It won't be long until he comes in and clears things up, since nobody would dare listen to a guy that gives the benefit of the doubt to coaches rather than message boarders
You bet $$$ on Rutgers tonight v. Kansas St., you lost that bet and lost that $$$, but you're on here saying you made the right bet.

Lol.
 
Lol OP... never change. Self righteous dbag

Makes a post trying to prove some kind of point. Doubles down on his stupidity. Loses his bet. Tries to convince everyone that his bet was actually smart bc he would win in the long run. Gets called out repeatedly. Then claims everyone is actually wrong bc they don't understand.

What a dipshit
 
Lol OP... never change. Self righteous dbag

Makes a post trying to prove some kind of point. Doubles down on his stupidity. Loses his bet. Tries to convince everyone that his bet was actually smart bc he would win in the long run. Gets called out repeatedly. Then claims everyone is actually wrong bc they don't understand.

What a dipshit
Agree 1,000% but I don't want to lose him, it's just too funny.
 
Lol OP... never change. Self righteous dbag

Makes a post trying to prove some kind of point. Doubles down on his stupidity. Loses his bet. Tries to convince everyone that his bet was actually smart bc he would win in the long run. Gets called out repeatedly. Then claims everyone is actually wrong bc they don't understand.

What a dipshit
How long have you been sports betting?

Never played poker? Any type of speculation backed by money?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
It was a simple question.

Do you think Rutgers wins that game slightly less than 1 out of 3 times?
Rutgers was 0-1 tonight. They're not playing the game 3 times.

That's all that matters.

Why do you hate winning and like losing money?

LOL at dude running his mouth about a bet he makes, losing, and then trying to convince everyone how awesome he is at sports gambling. LOL.

Stick to your dumbass "8-4" and "run the ball" posts.
 
The correct pick was to take Rutgers and the points.
I believe that bet to have had an edge vs the juice in the long run as well.

Usually, I would have split a unit sized bet into partial unit on Rutgers+7, and partial unit on Rutgers ml +220. I had the +220 in a parlay from earlier in the day, and got tied up and lost my chance to get in on +7.

Not the case here, IMO, but just because +7 wins doesn't necessarily mean it was a winning bet in the long run
 
Rutgers was 0-1 tonight. They're not playing the game 3 times.

That's all that matters.

Why do you hate winning and like losing money?

LOL at dude running his mouth about a bet he makes, losing, and then trying to convince everyone how awesome he is at sports gambling. LOL.

Stick to your dumbass "8-4" and "run the ball" posts.
And tell me about your sports betting career.

Clearly not much, as you clearly don't get it either
 
Since this is such a popular thread, everyone take a moment to update yourselves in the "line play" thread
 
And tell me about your sports betting career.

Clearly not much, as you clearly don't get it either
Simple:

When I win a bet, I get $. When I don't win a bet, I lose $.

I don't pretend that my losing bets are really winning bets because they should have won at least 1 out of 3 times.

You think if I use a bunch of gambling buzz-words on this board that it will impress everyone?

LOL
 
41-29 Rutgers with the ball in the 4th.

Like their chances.

Love my chances on the ML+220😂
Why do you guys think I phrased attached thread as such before the game ever ended?

"Like" Rutgers chances to win.

"Love" my chances vs the +220 odds.

Rutgers and I are not playing the same game. They have to beat K St. I have to beat the odds. Same concept as a point spread
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
Simple:

When I win a bet, I get $. When I don't win a bet, I lose $.

I don't pretend that my losing bets are really winning bets because they should have won at least 1 out of 3 times.

You think if I use a bunch of gambling buzz-words on this board that it will impress everyone?

LOL
I would bet a lot of money you aren't a winning sports bettor over time
 
Why do you guys think I phrased attached thread as such before the game ever ended?

"Like" Rutgers chances to win.

"Love" my chances vs the +220 odds.

Rutgers and I are not playing the same game. They have to beat K St. I have to beat the odds. Same concept as a point spread
I would "like" to know why you think you won a bet that you lost.

I "love" watching you get destroyed in this thread.
I would bet a lot of money you aren't a winning sports bettor over time
I would bet even more that you aren't
 
I would "like" to know why you think you won a bet that you lost.

I "love" watching you get destroyed in this thread.

I would bet even more that you aren't
Read better and/or apply 3rd grade math.

I don't expect you guys to understand sports betting.

But this board has to have some of the least credible posts on the internet.

But that's football fans for you. And I've been saying this for decades
 
Read better and/or apply 3rd grade math.

I don't expect you guys to understand sports betting.

But this board has to have some of the least credible posts on the internet.

But that's football fans for you. And I've been saying this for decades
Lol, you're a guy who hands away $$$ and then tries to get everyone to believe you were handed $$$.

Just so funny. Please never leave.
 
Lol, you're a guy who hands away $$$ and then tries to get everyone to believe you were handed $$$.

Just so funny. Please never leave.
I'm not trying to get anybody to believe anything.

Only defending against ignorant attacks.

If you want to start paying for my long-term winners, I'll start the convincing
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
Do I gotta be on drugs for this thread to make sense? So dude says two other teams bowl results are what we should base Iowa's season on last year, even though Iowa actually got the shit kicked out of them in their bowl game 35-0. Then carries that over into this season based on the first half results of a bowl game of a team Iowa didn't even play. That team then blows a lead, dude loses a bet, but then doubles down on it saying he that even though he literally lost money, he didn't really lose the bet. Then basically calls everyone else an idiot. Am I missing anything?
 
Read better and/or apply 3rd grade math.

I don't expect you guys to understand sports betting.

But this board has to have some of the least credible posts on the internet.

But that's football fans for you. And I've been saying this for decades
Just hear me out – don’t you think that when you’ve gotten to the point that you feel like you need to explain the game of football AND sports gambling to guys on a sports message board, that maybe YOU are the one who lacks credibility?
 
Why do you guys think I phrased attached thread as such before the game ever ended?

"Like" Rutgers chances to win.

"Love" my chances vs the +220 odds.

Rutgers and I are not playing the same game. They have to beat K St. I have to beat the odds. Same concept as a point spread
Confuse Chloe Moretz GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: InsaneHawkJJP
Do I gotta be on drugs for this thread to make sense? So dude says two other teams bowl results are what we should base Iowa's season on last year, even though Iowa actually got the shit kicked out of them in their bowl game 35-0. Then carries that over into this season based on the first half results of a bowl game of a team Iowa didn't even play. That team then blows a lead, dude loses a bet, but then doubles down on it saying he that even though he literally lost money, he didn't really lose the bet. Then basically calls everyone else an idiot. Am I missing anything?
No, that’s spot on.

Welcome to eyesucks’ version of the world…
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Iron Doc and 2D_
Do I gotta be on drugs for this thread to make sense? So dude says two other teams bowl results are what we should base Iowa's season on last year, even though Iowa actually got the shit kicked out of them in their bowl game 35-0. Then carries that over into this season based on the first half results of a bowl game of a team Iowa didn't even play. That team then blows a lead, dude loses a bet, but then doubles down on it saying he that even though he literally lost money, he didn't really lose the bet. Then basically calls everyone else an idiot. Am I missing anything?
The guy is broken, mentally speaking. You can even see him begging to visit other threads he's spazzing out in as well. Better to just put him on ignore and laugh at his posts. Trying to reason with him or even argue his points results in a confusing word salad.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT