Except, in this specific discussion, based on YOUR specific post, you stated "Let us guess….you never had those kind of relations as a young Buck, so sorry." What this means is not only were you willing to vote for him with the established behavior in general, YOU find it acceptable for any man to abuse sexually women when they are in their "randy youth" phase. And that in one's youth, it is an opportunity to and if chis (or others didn't take that opportunity "so sorry", that they missed their "get out of jail" card. Your words! And you used a plural, indicating you feel that a pattern of sexual abuse is okay. Again, your words.
So, what we have learned is you may have sexually assaulted women when you were younger.
You find it acceptable to assault women if the predator is "sowing their oats" as a young man.
If someone is rich, it is okay to assault women, esp if they are a playboy. And, for the record, married.
And now most recently "if everyone else is okay with it", it isn't a big deal.
Now watch this....... there is no circumstance that I find it acceptable for a person, to sexually abuse another person. Regardless of age, income, gender, social status, etc.
Do you see the difference between having a firm moral compass and not?
And now, you are not sure how to back out gracefully. Pro tip, there is no way. But at least stand up and stick by your statements. Or don't. Either way, it's pretty clear what you are at your core.
edit - I guess there is an option 3, admit you were talking out of your ass for "tuff guy" likes.