Been there chief.....I went through a divorce and lived in some holes. Climbed back out.
How will Haley "Restore" the Economy?
- Thread starter JRHawk2003
- Start date
Been there chief.....I went through a divorce and lived in some holes. Climbed back out.
Not really. No one exact reason. Several bad stresses at once didn't help.
Not sure Haley has presented any solid plans.
Most of her campaigning is just the "red meat" stuff that you hear every election cycle.
With her, tho, it seems the DeSantis ads attacking her for flip flopping on China has forced her to try and portray herself as being tough vs Xi...and that would certainly drive the economy down as it would hurt trade and force costs of goods higher.
So, I'd say she's very weak on economic issues.
Most of her campaigning is just the "red meat" stuff that you hear every election cycle.
With her, tho, it seems the DeSantis ads attacking her for flip flopping on China has forced her to try and portray herself as being tough vs Xi...and that would certainly drive the economy down as it would hurt trade and force costs of goods higher.
So, I'd say she's very weak on economic issues.
Generally being a Republican is enough to make people feel a little better about the economy, particularly when it comes to consumer confidence. Maybe she's banking on that...
She's very weak across the board right now. That happens when one bends the knee to and clearly fears a conman and his cult base.
This is one of the great American myths - Republicans are better for the economy. They aren't.
So just because you went through a divorce you can say you’ve lived with little income?
I guess we should be giving you some info on how to stay married because you can’t manage that very well.
She's so wishy washy. Whatever crowd she is in front of, she will change what she favors. It's like the slavery debacle all over again. It makes me seriously think that she would give China the store just as soon as she had the audience.
Her plan hinges on Trump being convicted or dying before July, and “Biden is old”.
My preferred candidate for the moment is Nikki Haley based on her foreign policy statements alone. She alone among the Republican field seems to understand the stakes in the Russia/Ukraine conflict and the ramifications of the vicious Hamas attack on Israel.
Economic policy should be fairly straight forward since we already know from the Trump presidency what works.
With a Republican Senate and Congress, it should be a simple matter of restoring the Trump tax rates. Since most of the damage to energy production under this president has been through edict, a President Haley should be able to revoke those targeting oil and gas production fairly quickly.
Our new President should support a restoration of the Trump economic policy and of the Trump energy policy.
So there it is:
1.) Haley Foreign Policy
2.) Trump Economic Policy
3.) Trump Energy Policy
All administered by a President Haley
Knowing that Haley is solid on foreign policy, I am waiting to hear her economic proposals, but since she seems to understand the inflation issue, I am optimistic that she understands that sending dollars overseas to buy crude oil is the dumbest thing we can do as a nation. Reversing the flow of dollars-for-crude-oil will almost instantly impact the rate of price inflation.
Additionally, there is a lot of economic hubris surrounding our rush to solve the chimeric issue of Climate Change, but she seems brighter than the other candidates, so I suspect she understands what needs to be done. Eliminating all or most of the various climate regulations (CAFE Standards for example) will go a long way.
Taking all of this together, we have a package for reversing the decline of Western Civilization. Nikki Haley may be the only candidate in either party capable of pulling this off.
..................................
Economic policy should be fairly straight forward since we already know from the Trump presidency what works.
With a Republican Senate and Congress, it should be a simple matter of restoring the Trump tax rates. Since most of the damage to energy production under this president has been through edict, a President Haley should be able to revoke those targeting oil and gas production fairly quickly.
Our new President should support a restoration of the Trump economic policy and of the Trump energy policy.
So there it is:
1.) Haley Foreign Policy
2.) Trump Economic Policy
3.) Trump Energy Policy
All administered by a President Haley
Knowing that Haley is solid on foreign policy, I am waiting to hear her economic proposals, but since she seems to understand the inflation issue, I am optimistic that she understands that sending dollars overseas to buy crude oil is the dumbest thing we can do as a nation. Reversing the flow of dollars-for-crude-oil will almost instantly impact the rate of price inflation.
Additionally, there is a lot of economic hubris surrounding our rush to solve the chimeric issue of Climate Change, but she seems brighter than the other candidates, so I suspect she understands what needs to be done. Eliminating all or most of the various climate regulations (CAFE Standards for example) will go a long way.
Taking all of this together, we have a package for reversing the decline of Western Civilization. Nikki Haley may be the only candidate in either party capable of pulling this off.
..................................
Last edited:
For context, this guy thinks the Epoch Times is a legitimate "open-minded" news source.
Tax cuts for the wealthy only benefit the rich | LSE Research
History suggests that policies relying on “trickle-down economics” are destined to fail, and yet the idea, for some, still persists. David Hope explains why tax cuts for top earners only benefit the rich and why the issue is so controversial to discuss.
www.lse.ac.uk
Trickle-Down Economics: Four Reasons Why It Just Doesn't Work
We've all heard the claims that cutting tax rates for the richest Americans will improve the standard of living for the working class. Supposedly, top-bracket tax breaks will result in more jobs being created, higher wages for the average worker, and an overall upturn in our economy. It's at the...
The reason the Trump tax cuts were so successful was because they were tax cuts for EVERYBODY. People keep attempting to twist this reality into being something it was not.Tax cuts for the wealthy only benefit the rich | LSE Research
History suggests that policies relying on “trickle-down economics” are destined to fail, and yet the idea, for some, still persists. David Hope explains why tax cuts for top earners only benefit the rich and why the issue is so controversial to discuss.
Trickle-Down Economics: Four Reasons Why It Just Doesn't Work
We've all heard the claims that cutting tax rates for the richest Americans will improve the standard of living for the working class. Supposedly, top-bracket tax breaks will result in more jobs being created, higher wages for the average worker, and an overall upturn in our economy. It's at the...www.faireconomy.org
An across-the-board tax cut for everyone impacts those at the bottom to a greater degree than it does the wealthy. The level of satisfaction is greater.
Here is a brush-up on Utility Theory. I trust that most here will accept the Kahn Academy as a legitimate source, although the theory itself has been out there forever and should be a part of any legitimate course in introductory economics.
https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...B8284310CBF8065ED5E7B8284310CBF8065&FORM=VIRE
Last edited:
They weren't, but even hypothesizing that they do benefit everyone, your solution to the current economy is more government stimulus? That's just stupid.
The amounts of money gained from tax cuts is far greater for those paying more taxes than for those who pay little or no taxes. That concept should be easy enough for even you to understand.
Utility Theory is a very simpleminded approach to explain consumer behavior that has been shown to be woefully inadequate.
Uh, most people lose their tax cuts in a couple years
Only because they fall for the Democratic whine machine and vote in a tax-and-spend-person.
It seems to happen every time and is totally ridiculous.
If you think tax-and-spend is irresponsible, tell us how you feel about the borrow-and-spend GOP.
Bullcrap. The wealthy got millions. Most of us got bread crumbs. His tax cuts once again benefited the top 1% over the rest of us.
When republicans passed the tax cuts, the common man’s tax cuts were temporary. Rich man permanent.
I read it in a book by Tom Clancy. It was pretty popular. Republicans fap to his books.
Similar threads
