If we had Purdy we would be unbeaten.
- Thread starter Sett1997
- Start date
What a dumb call by Campbell. They had the momentum.
He had his TE wide open. That was a gutsy game and some gutsy decisions in the 4th that almost won the day. Almost. Hell of a game though.
Don't know about unbeaten but man... I'd like to have him.
Yes. A totally different offense playing garbage Big 12 defenses. You can't just pluck that and out it in Iowa and see it translate.
Mobile as crap, not afraid to run the ball, good arm. Explain how?
He put the ball right in the midsection of his Receiver. Could have been caught, maybe should have been, and there was definite contact before the ball got there.
There is no such thing as a bad read in the Big 12. Everyone is open, on every play.
If we had anyone else's O-line, we'd be undefeated.
Impossible. If we had Purdy during the ISU game, he would have had to beat his own team.
The guy can scramble and pass. Major upgrade.
How many points do you think we would score on Oklahoma in Norman?
I don't like the 2pt conv. attempt to win. Kick it and win in OT
My comment was WE would be unbeaten with Purdy. We have a much better D than ISU.
Oh, sorry, I don’t comment on unprovable hypotheticals. ISU is 5-4 with Purdy. Ya know, the team that was hyped to be the best ISU team ever in the preseason.
Did you miss his 3 interceptions 2 weeks ago? How’s he do against tough defenses?
Good play call. TE was wide open, Purdy made a bad read.
We would not be unbeaten b/c the strength & conditioning coaches kid is starting at MLB.
We would not be unbeaten b/c the strength & conditioning coaches kid is starting at MLB.
threw 5 TDs no picks on the road against #9 team in the country. Stanley would never do that.
Iowa fans by and large are heavily biased morons. I hate our fanbase sometimes.
Iowa fans by and large are heavily biased morons. I hate our fanbase sometimes.
D is not our problem. If you can't see that you're blind.
Nate can't freaking move, what are you missing here? Any hint of pressure he freaks out.
That Oklahoma defense is terrible. Also, aren’t you from the same idiot fan base that claims a ‘phantom’ holding call prevented the clones from beating Iowa earlier this year? LOL!
If you're talking to me, I'm a life long Hawk fan and not even close to being an idiot.
He's very mobile though, much of his time to throw was created by that. That's my point.
You do realize there was a defender breathing down his neck that blocked his vision?
Lol bad read? He read the play as best he could with a guy barrelling down on him and he made a perfect freaking throw between 2 defenders that should've been caught. Throwing back into the defender in the backfield with him would've been impossible.
Just because Brock Huard said "so and so" was open does not mean he made a "bad read." It means a guy was open and it was too bad the pressure was there because he would've had it.
Not really. He was coming open just as Brock was winding up to throw it. And he was in the blind spot where the defensive lineman was in the backfield with him, so let's stop this nonsense about how the TE was wide open and should've been the read. So many freakin armchair QBs thinking this is Madden
Who the F is brock Hurd?
I watched the replay & saw the TE wide open, chill out bra!
I would take purdy over our QB in a hot second
Similar threads
