ADVERTISEMENT

If you pay off your mortgage and

What if you gave them false financial statements, so you could get a 3% loan rate, instead of a 9% or 10% (or even higher) for a loan that wasn't actually "secured"?

And you benefitted from that fraudulent loan rate against business competitors, who DID properly disclose their finances?

You seem somewhat oblivious to what your buddy and idol Trump actually did.
It's more on the financial institution to do their due diligence to ensure they are making a financially smart loan.

I don't believe DJT did anything wrong
 
If you falsify the information, you commit a crime.

Trump did so, time and time again.
I get that- what did he misrepresent? If its simply "I value Trump Shitbox at $10, loan me $5- and the bank agrees even though shitbox is worth $4"- seems like bank would only have issue under default? I think people like to stick in this area because real estate value is so gray.

Or, did he fraud up something else? Are these transactions more complex, in that It's not a simple as getting a percentage loan against one developed asset?

I think I just don't get why the state was involved, though I understand the state of NY has some wide sweeping law that allows them to interject themselves.
 
financial folks. I owe 133k on the house at 2.75. I could pay it off or just keep doing what I’m doing. What’s your thoughts?
When actively investing, leveraging your money through a mortgage can be advantageous. However, if your funds are currently idle, directing them towards paying off your mortgage becomes a prudent choice, allowing you to save 2.75% annually on the remaining loan balance.
 
Last edited:
It's more on the financial institution to do their due diligence to ensure they are making a financially smart loan.

I don't believe DJT did anything wrong
Well, without a doubt he did something wrong. He filed inaccurate financial statements - on purpose. Anytime I've had to provide a financial statement I had to sign a statement that they were accurate to the best of my knowledge.

You can argue that no one was hurt, but I would disagree with that too. He got favorable terms when he wasn't entitled to them.

When you apply for a loan, the bank asks for a financial statement. I assume it's because it's important.
 
I get that- what did he misrepresent? If its simply "I value Trump Shitbox at $10, loan me $5- and the bank agrees even though shitbox is worth $4"- seems like bank would only have issue under default? I think people like to stick in this area because real estate value is so gray.

Or, did he fraud up something else? Are these transactions more complex, in that It's not a simple as getting a percentage loan against one developed asset?

I think I just don't get why the state was involved, though I understand the state of NY has some wide sweeping law that allows them to interject themselves.
He received better rates thus the penalties. If you weren't aware, his fine isn't made up by the judge. It was a calculated number in the amount he saved with the better rate by falsifying the values of the properties.
 
He received better rates thus the penalties. If you weren't aware, his fine isn't made up by the judge. It was a calculated number in the amount he saved with the better rate by falsifying the values of the properties.
Gotcha- I’m not an underwriter. If these are 1:1 type loans- ie one property to secure one loan- he gets a better rate by overvaluing that asset; or is it a deal where a collection of others assets are factored into his “wealth” increasing his overall value (less risk) securing the better rate?

Not saying he wasn’t a slimeball, just trying to understand the fraud; while also connecting it to a state issue.
 
Gotcha- I’m not an underwriter. If these are 1:1 type loans- ie one property to secure one loan- he gets a better rate by overvaluing that asset; or is it a deal where a collection of others assets are factored into his “wealth” increasing his overall value (less risk) securing the better rate?

Not saying he wasn’t a slimeball, just trying to understand the fraud; while also connecting it to a state issue.
While I'm not an underwriter, I would presume that the bank offers more favorable rates because they mitigate their risk by securing collateral. In the event that Trump fails to repay the loan, the bank can seize the properties pledged as collateral. However, a potential issue arises if the actual value of these properties doesn't align with the information provided to the bank. This discrepancy could pose a challenge in the lending arrangement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennNole17
I get that- what did he misrepresent? If its simply "I value Trump Shitbox at $10, loan me $5- and the bank agrees even though shitbox is worth $4"- seems like bank would only have issue under default? I think people like to stick in this area because real estate value is so gray.

Or, did he fraud up something else? Are these transactions more complex, in that It's not a simple as getting a percentage loan against one developed asset?

I think I just don't get why the state was involved, though I understand the state of NY has some wide sweeping law that allows them to interject themselves.
She campaigned on a promise to get Trump for something anything at all costs.

I hope the whole thing blows up in her face.
 
While I'm not an underwriter, I would presume that the bank offers more favorable rates because they mitigate their risk by securing collateral. In the event that Trump fails to repay the loan, the bank can seize the properties pledged as collateral. However, a potential issue arises if the actual value of these properties doesn't align with the information provided to the bank. This discrepancy could pose a challenge in the lending arrangement.
Isn’t it the banks obligation to assess their own value?

I know my lender did - and I think that is the lense some people are looking at this through.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
Well, without a doubt he did something wrong. He filed inaccurate financial statements - on purpose. Anytime I've had to provide a financial statement I had to sign a statement that they were accurate to the best of my knowledge.

You can argue that no one was hurt, but I would disagree with that too. He got favorable terms when he wasn't entitled to them.

When you apply for a loan, the bank asks for a financial statement. I assume it's because it's important.
Do you for one minute believe the alleged better rate was $435 million better?
 
Isn’t it the banks obligation to assess their own value?

I know my lender did - and I think that is the lense some people are looking at this through.
It's amusing how valuations work. The loanee or bank can exert influence on the appraisers hired by the loan recipients, creating a potential conflict of interest.

As for your suggestion that there might be a reason to justify Trump's actions, it's important to clarify that there is no valid justification for fraudulent behavior. Managing a country requires integrity, and someone who can't run their own business without resorting to dishonesty shouldn't be entrusted with the responsibilities of leading a nation.
 
Even if true, doesn't really matter, as the bank would have disregarded any information provided by Trump and set their own valuation,... Nobody was a victim here.
Gosh...makes you wonder why there's a law against it, huh? BTW, how do you know the particulars of this transaction? Are they published somewhere? Could you point them out or are you just talking out of your ass, as usual?
 
Or, did he fraud up something else?
Yes.

Read the case documents and judgements.
For one, he pretended his own flat was 30,000 sq ft, when it was actually 10,000.
Even provided falsified documents to banks for that (where elevator shafts and HVAC systems were included as though they were part of his unit).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennNole17
Isn’t it the banks obligation to assess their own value?

I know my lender did - and I think that is the lense some people are looking at this through.
The idea that the bank treats you the same way they treat someone like Trump...well, those are not the same lenses. According to his tax returns, banks forgave over $285 MILLION in loans to Trump from 2010 to 2020. Just ate them. Deutsche Bank even loaned him millions more after he defaulted on hundreds of millions in loans and even sued them. Think they'd do that for you? When Trump declared bankruptcy in the 90's, the bank gave him a 5-figure per month allowance to live on. Think they'd do that for you? The idea that they checked Trump's claims the same way they check yours is...unlikely.
 
The idea that the bank treats you the same way they treat someone like Trump...well, those are not the same lenses. According to his tax returns, banks forgave over $285 MILLION in loans to Trump from 2010 to 2020. Just ate them. Deutsche Bank even loaned him millions more after he defaulted on hundreds of millions in loans and even sued them. Think they'd do that for you? When Trump declared bankruptcy in the 90's, the bank gave him a 5-figure per month allowance to live on. Think they'd do that for you? The idea that they checked Trump's claims the same way they check yours is...unlikely.
I take it you're not a fan of loan forgiveness.
 
What percent are you making on your 133k currently? If you realize a return greater than 2.75%, you should not pay off your house, as you would be negatively impacting your retirement income.

Also-If you are not earning more than 2.75%, consider changing financial advisors.
I’ve kept that part of my savings in high yield in case I need it so it’s at about 5%
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoleinATL
When actively investing, leveraging your money through a mortgage can be advantageous. However, if your funds are currently idle, directing them towards paying off your mortgage becomes a prudent choice, allowing you to save 2.75% annually on the remaining loan balance.
I’ve got about 150 in high yield at about 5%. I’m paranoid and think I might need it fast. I have more in Roths but I want money I can get to easy.
 
The idea that the bank treats you the same way they treat someone like Trump...well, those are not the same lenses. According to his tax returns, banks forgave over $285 MILLION in loans to Trump from 2010 to 2020. Just ate them. Deutsche Bank even loaned him millions more after he defaulted on hundreds of millions in loans and even sued them. Think they'd do that for you? When Trump declared bankruptcy in the 90's, the bank gave him a 5-figure per month allowance to live on. Think they'd do that for you? The idea that they checked Trump's claims the same way they check yours is...unlikely.
My bank would not do that.

Was the bank charged with any crimes? I’m not being obtuse or flippant- I’m not siding with Trump.
 
I’ve got about 150 in high yield at about 5%. I’m paranoid and think I might need it fast. I have more in Roths but I want money I can get to easy.

Why do you need access to cash?
If the cash is for gambling, set up an account at your favorite casino that has a good/great host manager. Hosts make moving money much easier and can bypass a lot of the BS.
If you are a conspiracy guy and want to get into prepping, the dollar is useless. Put money into ammo, various fuel sources and food.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SI_NYC
Why do you need access to cash?
If the cash is for gambling, set up an account at your favorite casino that has a good/great host manager. Hosts make moving money much easier and can bypass a lot of the BS.
If you are a conspiracy guy and want to get into prepping, the dollar is useless. Put money into ammo, various fuel sources and food.
Just for emergency expenses. I want to be able to pay off everything all at once. It’s kind of a mental issue.
 
Why do you need access to cash?
If the cash is for gambling, set up an account at your favorite casino that has a good/great host manager. Hosts make moving money much easier and can bypass a lot of the BS.
If you are a conspiracy guy and want to get into prepping, the dollar is useless. Put money into ammo, various fuel sources and food.
If for some unknown reason the ATM's and most card readers get shutdown you might want to have some cash handy to tied you over for 4 or 5 days.
 
Gosh...makes you wonder why there's a law against it, huh? BTW, how do you know the particulars of this transaction? Are they published somewhere? Could you point them out or are you just talking out of your ass, as usual?

There is no law against what Trump is being charged with, as the statute in question is being improperly applied here,.. This consumer protection law has never before been used in this fashion, and the Governor of New York is going out of her way to advise New York business investors that it will never be used like this again,.. This is just another DNC erected road block.
 
There is no law against what Trump is being charged with, as the statute in question is being improperly applied here,.. This consumer protection law has never before been used in this fashion, and the Governor of New York is going out of her way to advise New York business investors that it will never be used like this again,.. This is just another DNC erected road block.
Poor Trump. Always the victim.
 
Somewhat related.

I bought my 6.5 acres back in Iowa for $29,900 cash. Henry county treasurer office had the tax value at $19,000.

I built my barndominium on it last year and financed the structure with the local bank. On my asset sheet I put 60,000 as the value of the property. The bank’s appraiser said the value of the lot without a building was $112,500.

My building is built and I built a pond. I’m going to build a house on it. I think I could sell it now and get $200,000.

What should I list the value of my property at now on my balance sheet?

If I’m too high am I committing fraud?
 
Poor Trump. Always the victim.
this is the real 2024 trump platform

greivance and victimhood is all he has

keep this in mind as he says he'll be a dictator (*but for only one day) and his lawyer argues he should be able to have political opponents assassinated without repurcussion
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFSNOLE
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT