Let's play a fun game called "How Many TEs are there in the Big 12!"
There are 10 teams in the Big 12, as we all know, and 9 of them (sorry Texas Tech) list receiving stats for players identified as TE. From there, let's take a look at the top TEs at each school:
Name, School, Receptions, Yards, TDs
Andrews, Oklahoma, 62, 958, 8
Johnson, Kansas, 30, 363, 1
Brewer, Texas, 9, 80, 2
Feuerbacher, Baylor, 7, 73, 1
Hunt, TCU, 7, 63, 0
Wellman, WVU, 5, 36, 0
Abbott, Ok. St., 4, 69, 0
Allen, Iowa St., 4, 39, 0
Valentine, KSU, 2, 10, 0
Bonus stats! If a school had a 2nd TE with multiple receptions, here are their stats:
Calcaterra, Oklahoma, 10, 162, 3
Brown, Ok. St., 4, 56, 0
Moore, Texas, 3, 33, 1
Wainright, Baylor, 4, 34, 2
Right from the start we can see that there's some real stiff competition for all conference at TE in the Big 12. Andrews is without a doubt a great TE based on the numbers. After him the 2nd best is either Johnson at KU or Calcaterra at Oklahoma, without factoring in blocking. For reference, both Fant and Hockenson would have easily been 2nd team in the Big 12.
So my fellow hawkeye fans, if you find yourself in conversation with a cyclone and they try to claim their TEs are anywhere near Iowa's and point to Chase Allen being a 2nd team all conference, feel free to use this information. Here's another fun argument you can throw at them as well:
Mark Andrews (OU): 62 receptions, 958 yards, 8 TDs
Ben Johnson (KU): 30 receptions, 363 yards, 1 TD
Noah Fant: 30 receptions, 494 yards, 11 TDs
TJ Hockenson: 24 receptions, 320 yards, 3 TDs
Remainder of Big 12 Starting TEs: 38 receptions, 370 yards, 3 TDs
If 2nd team all Big 12 at TE is such a prestigious accomplishment, why are the combined top TE numbers for 7 teams worse than Fant and comparable to Hockenson?