there never was a recovery, there was no growth, 2008 is still happening, whomever is new prez has a got a lot to deal with in 2016
Dude, I'm just saying that I would be hard pressed to believe the people who caused the crash. The banks so royally screwed the people, and they did it intentionally. After that, they made the common man pay for their golden parachutes. They weren't the only guilty party, but there's a lot of blood on their hands so to speak.
By definition, it is a correction (a 10% drop).This isn't a correction. It's a reaction to China and worldwide oil slipping.
And they were able to do it why? The market they were playing was Dodge City with no Marshall Dillon. A libertarian wet dream, I would think. These guys were dreaming up ways to "screw the people" and they knew no one was watching them.
Now you can make the case that the govt was in bed with them in terms of dropping regs, not enforcing regs, and ignoring players who SHOULD have been regulated...and you will certainly have an ally. But you can't call for less regulation on the one hand and then pretend it wasn't EXACTLY that that led to the market collapse.
You just made my point for me. I am quite educated as a matter of fact.I love it when people with no education dismiss education.
This was also called out on by people who saw the bubble from it coming.100% wrong. It was, in fact, regulation that caused the financial meltdown. The feds were chasing a policy of increased home ownership, especially for poor and minorities, by requiring banks to make mortgage loans to people who could not pay them back. That artificially drove up housing prices and created the crisis.
You just made my point for me. I am quite educated as a matter of fact.
Wrong. The banks hands were forced by federal policy and regulation, that required them to make mortgage loans to folks who couldn't pay them back. The feds then created and approved the market by which the bad loans could be bundled and sold. The WST has detailed how this happened.
I'm sure they would be had I graced them with my presence. Keep pouring water into the ocean, you'll drown it eventually.I'm sure dmacc is quite proud of you.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac love this post from you Ciggy. You just can't ever decide whether you're a supporter of the elite or if you are a detest of them can you? Whatever fits your agenda I guess.....Ah, the good old wingnut revisionism mythology that federal policy caused the recession. You have been brainwashed well!
I'm sure they would be had I graced them with my presence. Keep pouring water into the ocean, you'll drown it eventually.
Never said I went to DMACC. You're playing Jello games with breed crumbs here.Well you did say you went there, maybe when you were pretending to be a black guy. Hard to keep all your lies straight.
I'm sure whatever community college you attended at night is proud of you.
Never said I went to DMACC. You're playing Jello games with breed crumbs here.
Ah, the good old wingnut revisionism mythology that federal policy caused the recession. You have been brainwashed well!
Syracuse,..Community college. Oh wait is it a community college? I forgot actually. Do you think you can google that? I do also have online course going at the moment from Kaplan. You know that GI Bill though, use it or lose it, eh?lol, you cant even keep your lies straight black man. What community college proudly calls you an alum?
Syracuse,..Community college. Oh wait is it a community college? I forgot actually. Do you think you can google that? I do also have online course going at the moment from Kaplan. You know that GI Bill though, use it or lose it, eh?
Keep the questions coming though... I LIKE IT!!!
Not online at Syracuse actually. Tell us about your educational history.online classes at syracuse and kaplan
![]()
Not online at Syracuse actually. Tell us about your educational history.
Oooh,, yuck. A Dowling guy,...Dowling
Harvard
Im everything you hate and i love it.
Never been a black guy though.
Good grief. This started by you claiming that the average S&P PE without FANGs included would show that the market was not overvalued when it was at 18K. I noted that if one looked at good, solid companies that their P&Es were in the twenties, which is higher than the historic average. I also noted that the last 20 years are an anomaly that contain two humongous bubbles that skew the average PE substantially higher than it historically is. So, you suggest to make the period a little longer (50 years), but still include the outlier period (the last 20 years).My bad, I assumed a resourceful guy like you could plug in the numbers. Don't like 20 years, look at the 50, same deal. But if your arbitrary term of good companies shows otherwise so be it.