ADVERTISEMENT

Is Tulsi the mistress of Putin?

Transcripts have been found...

Putin: "Hey, Comrade, just so you know, we have a secret agent over there. A politician named Gabbard. Keep it on the down low."

Agent: "Soooo...you think I, a known Russian agent, should donate to her campaign?"

Putin: "What? No! You should NOT give her money and call attention to this! Are you nuts?"

Agent: "What if it's like only 60 bucks?"

Putin: "Sigh...You already did it, didn't you?

Agent: "My bad."

Putin: "Goddammit. Get our of my office. I'm so mad I could blow up a maternity ward!"
4h6p.gif
 
Gabbard obviously has ulterior motives, but right now, she certainly can't be believed or trusted.

And the comparison to Mike Flynn is relevant. Wearing a uniform doesn't mean her intentions are patriotic.
The nice thing is that neither of them have to be listened to or trusted. They're both essentially bloggers/podcasters.
 
Transcripts have been found...

Putin: "Hey, Comrade, just so you know, we have a secret agent over there. A politician named Gabbard. Keep it on the down low."

Agent: "Soooo...you think I, a known Russian agent, should donate to her campaign?"

Putin: "What? No! You should NOT give her money and call attention to this! Are you nuts?"

Agent: "What if it's like only 60 bucks?"

Putin: "Sigh...You already did it, didn't you?

Agent: "My bad."

Putin: "Goddammit. Get our of my office. I'm so mad I could blow up a maternity ward!"

You really can’t go wrong with a maternity ward bombing joke.
 
She took 60 bucks from someone with dual citizenship that was found to have ties...........I'm no Tulsi fan but if you are going to get up in arms about that shit you are looking for something to get upset about. Do you think these people filter ever 30(x2) dollar contribution? I'm willing to bet that if you were to go back through, line by line, every president for the last 60 years has had someone donate to them that had a sketchy background.
You should read the indictment.
justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1481101/download

There's a reason they don't get into the details.

But I did learn about the Russian fort built in Hawaii over 200 years ago, and that was interesting.
How different would 20th century history be if the Tsar had tried to keep Hawaii as a colony in the early 1800s?
 
While the combined total of those donations isn’t colossal by any means—a whopping $59.95

60 bucks. Man...the Daily Beast has uncovered a major story here.
But that's like, 6 trillion rubles.

Also I think that's how much I gave her before we learned she was 100% guano. I don't think I'll ever live down the shame.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tarheelbybirth
Some of you people are just unbelievable. Your blind partisan hatred is making you unhinged.


Normally I would agree but this seems like the left going after the left. Hell, I'm an outspoken republican, and I don't think anyone could be expected to have such tight accounting practices ro know where every 30 dollar contribution is coming from.
 
That's just a point to start examining your assertion 'Hillary was always right'

Do you think she was right about Libya?

Do you think she was right about Yemen?
You're right. I should have specified about Trump, what he is, Tulsi, etc. I don't know her positions on Libya or Yemen. I think you knew what I meant though.
 
Would, but who the hell wears a watch to the beach?
I do homes. Those divers watches ain't cheap. Besides, that's Padma Laxmi. Tulsi is actually half Samoan and 0 Indian. Padma is 100 percent Indian. Tulsi is just a nut hindu or thinks she's hindu.

And she is not attractive. Her face, without make up, looks like Edward James Olmos from Miami Vice.
 
Isn't the hatred toward Tulsi just good old fashioned patriotism/hating on Russia led by a murderous dictator? Join the fun.
Hatred toward Tulsi is really just good old fashioned jingoism/neocon lust for perpetual use of war as an instrument of policy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KFsdisciple
Hatred toward Tulsi is really just good old fashioned jingoism/neocon lust for perpetual use of war as a means of policy.
Oh f*** off.

Neocons lied us into war with Iraq when it was a bunch of Saudi Nationals who attacked us on 9/11.

Dick Cheney and Condi Rice aren't blowing smoke up our asses here. We're watching Vladimir Putin's forces bomb Ukrainians in real time.

- AND -

The US hasn't committed any boots on the ground or jets in the sky.

Sell your bullshit to the Nat Algrens of the board.
 
Oh f*** off.
Neocons lied us into war with Iraq when it was a bunch of Saudi Nationals who attacked us on 9/11.

And who was with them? Hillary.
That's why she smears Tulsi.
Hillary won't talk about how the policies she advanced in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people innocent people.
Instead she'll just say Tulsi is a Russian agent and cackle.
Admittedly, it successfully distracts a lot of people.

Dick Cheney and Condi Rice aren't blowing smoke up our asses here. We're watching Vladimir Putin's forces bomb Ukrainians in real time.

Those two are indeed out to pasture, but they weren't the last of the neocons.
Cheney's daughter is one of the torch bearers.
Victoria Nuland is another.

Nuland not only worked for both the Obama and Biden State Departments to run Ukraine policy (and, in many ways, Ukraine itself), but she also was Vice President Dick Cheney's deputy national security adviser and then President Bush's Ambassador to NATO. She comes from one of America's most prestigious neocon royal families; her husband, Robert Kagan, was a co-founder of the notorious neocon war-mongering group Project for the New American Century, which advocated regime change in Iraq long before 9/11. It was Kagan, along with liberal icon Bill Kristol, who (along with current editor-in-chief of The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg), was most responsible for the lie that Saddam was working hand-in-hand with Al Qaeda, a lie that played a key role in convincing Americans to believe that Saddam was personally involved in the planning of 9/11.

That a neocon like Nuland is admired and empowered regardless of the outcome of elections illustrates how unified and in lockstep the establishment wings of both parties are when it comes to questions of war, militarism and foreign policy. Indeed, Nuland's husband, Robert Kagan, was signaling that neocons would likely support Hillary Clinton for president — doing so in 2014, long before anyone imagined Trump as her opponent — based on the recognition that the Democratic Party was now more hospitable to neocon ideology than the GOP, where Ron Paul and then Trump's neo-isolationism was growing.

You can vote against neocons all you want, but they never go away. The fact that a member of one of the most powerful neocon families in the U.S. has been running Ukraine policy for the U.S. for years — having gone from Dick Cheney to Hillary Clinton and Obama and now to Biden — underscores how little dissent there is in Washington on such questions.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
And who was with them? Hillary.
That's why she smears Tulsi.
Hillary won't talk about how the policies she advanced in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people innocent people.
Instead she'll just say Tulsi is a Russian agent and cackle.
Admittedly, it successfully distracts a lot of people.



Those two are indeed out to pasture, but they weren't the last of the neocons.
Cheney's daughter is one of the torch bearers.
Victoria Nuland is another.

Nuland not only worked for both the Obama and Biden State Departments to run Ukraine policy (and, in many ways, Ukraine itself), but she also was Vice President Dick Cheney's deputy national security adviser and then President Bush's Ambassador to NATO. She comes from one of America's most prestigious neocon royal families; her husband, Robert Kagan, was a co-founder of the notorious neocon war-mongering group Project for the New American Century, which advocated regime change in Iraq long before 9/11. It was Kagan, along with liberal icon Bill Kristol, who (along with current editor-in-chief of The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg), was most responsible for the lie that Saddam was working hand-in-hand with Al Qaeda, a lie that played a key role in convincing Americans to believe that Saddam was personally involved in the planning of 9/11.

That a neocon like Nuland is admired and empowered regardless of the outcome of elections illustrates how unified and in lockstep the establishment wings of both parties are when it comes to questions of war, militarism and foreign policy. Indeed, Nuland's husband, Robert Kagan, was signaling that neocons would likely support Hillary Clinton for president — doing so in 2014, long before anyone imagined Trump as her opponent — based on the recognition that the Democratic Party was now more hospitable to neocon ideology than the GOP, where Ron Paul and then Trump's neo-isolationism was growing.

You can vote against neocons all you want, but they never go away. The fact that a member of one of the most powerful neocon families in the U.S. has been running Ukraine policy for the U.S. for years — having gone from Dick Cheney to Hillary Clinton and Obama and now to Biden — underscores how little dissent there is in Washington on such questions.

TL;DR.

I’ll repeat: We’re watching Putin bomb the Ukrainians in real time.
 
DERPITY DOO!!!

Step on up to say that it's anyone else's fault other than Russia's that Russia is bombing the Ukraine!

Out yourself as a Russian asset or an outright buffoon here!
Is anyone who knows why Nazi Germany invaded Poland & Russia a Nazi asset?
 
You do understand that wearing the uniform is no shield against collaborating, right? Serving doesn't make someone a saint...or even a good person. Good people do serve...so do very bad ones.
Yup, sure do understand, they have their own criminal courts and everything. But we're not talking about anyone other than Tulsi Gabbard here. Note the article makes no mention of her military service, and I think it's important that people here be fully informed before they start casting judgment. A person's U.S. military service is relevant to them being smeared as a "Russian asset".
 
To answer the original question is "no." Putin's mistress is currently hiding out in Switzerland with his bastard children. For some reason he doesn't keep his second wife in the UK like most of the Russian leadership does.


That doesn't mean that Tulsi hasn't serviced him in some way in the past, just that she's not the official side piece.
 
To answer the original question is "no." Putin's mistress is currently hiding out in Switzerland with his bastard children. For some reason he doesn't keep his second wife in the UK like most of the Russian leadership does.


That doesn't mean that Tulsi hasn't serviced him in some way in the past, just that she's not the official side piece.
“Russias most flexible woman” would smash her as well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT