Is Tulsi the mistress of Putin?
- Thread starter CleteyColgate
- Start date
No…not really. A Russian asset is what it is no matter what the outside looks like. Smearing someone is unrelated to what they do as well.
She’s smeared as a ‘Russian asset’ because her opinions about foreign policy run counter to neocon dreams, and concurrent to much of the public.
Instead of discuss the merits of those policy positions (absent in this thread as predicted) we’re just left with the baseless smears.
That’s the intent. Avoid substantive discussion of neocon failures and brand anyone who suggest a different approach as a foreign agent.
smh..I haven't said one word about her positions. It doesn't appear you have either. I pointed out that posting a pic of someone in uniform...ANYONE in uniform...does not in any way prevent that person from being a bad person. A traitor, even. The pic of TG in her uniform is a non sequitur. Irrelevant. Do you disagree?
What I do find interesting is that you now use "neocon" the same way OiT used "Bilderberg" back in the day. Where is OiT? Have the two of you ever been seen together?
I know. What do you think of them?
Another one of those things you quoted, but I guess didn't read:
"She’s smeared as a ‘Russian asset’ because her opinions about foreign policy run counter to neocon dreams"
The pic does point to her experience.
That isn't something I'd consider irrelevant in a discussion of foreign policy.
I agree wearing the uniform doesn't stop one from being a traitor.
Do you think she has done anything traitorous?
I use "neocon" in the conventional manner of the last twenty years, referring to the interventionist wing in American politics that view aggressive use of war as a valid foreign policy tool of the United States.
Flick brought it into the thread, I just pointed out Hillary was one of them.
Gabbard's a Russian asset, that does it for me.
If she's not getting paid by Putin, she's a really cheap date.
Not one word there about her positions. Try again? Better yet - don't.
FFS serving in the military does not in any way qualify her as some foreign policy wonk.
Now? Pretty damn close.
You use it a lot.
As Gomer Pyle would say, "Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!"
Oy, methinks there better be some lube around, might be a tad on the dry side. That said, wood smash!Gabbard
noem
I follow Tulsi on Tik Tok. I like her a lot. She hasn't really said much I can disagree with. It's really interesting how quite a few liberals turn on one of their own. I guess she dared have her own opinions and stopped being a slave to the party line.
Last edited:
It's never good when looking for a good dermatologist, you rely on the advice of Edward James Olmos and Kristi Noem.
LOL at “one of our own” who you agree with on everything.
This is true, too. It's truly shameful how the GOP nationally, and in Wyoming, has treated Liz.
Tulsi Gabbard took a meeting with Traitor Trump at Traitor Trump Tower?
shockedface.gif
shockedface.gif
I agree with Tulsi that the war in Ukraine is about expanding NATO.
No; it's simply not.
That is an EFFECT of the war. Putin CAUSED that.
And why is NATO expansion something viewed as "negative"? NATO only exists to counter Russian aggression and colonization of Eastern Europe.
Russia attacked Ukraine has massacred women and children and the result is an expanded NATO. She is, as a Lt Col of the US Armed Forces parroting Russian talking points, view points and not American/Democracy/NATO. She IS a Russian asset and has been for sometime per the email lady. She needs to be discharged from the military and lose any and all security clearances.
Why do I care?
It's a DEFENSIVE alliance.
What is it about Putin's "feelings" that makes you think we should design our military alliances around them?
The invasion of Ukraine did not just fall out of the sky. I don’t think Russia was justified in their invasion but I understand why they did it.
I understand why they did it, too.
And it has nothing to do with "NATO". It's the same thing they've been doing for years, and it's well past time for the West to say "No More".
Because we should want peace. Because it has provoked a war where a lot of innocent people are dying.
But the best reason is because we should want to be friends with Russia and isolate China and to a lesser extent Iran. These are the real long term rivals to America.
It doesn't change any of what and thankfully the majority think and know about her though. This is Nazi like sympathy that existed here pre Pearl Harbor.
What is it like to buy Kremlin talking points?
Russia invaded Ukraine to steal territory, natural gas resources, kidnap and subjugate Ukrainians, and to destroy their language and national identity.
You “understand why” this did this?
Explain!
