I would take him also. The more the better, as long as they don't get much if any money.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The worse B1G can say is no and based on their recent history...Micic, Suriano etc they say yes. Just going that route. Also, I seemed to hear that the B1G is going this route anyways here in the future. If so, why hold a kid up now when they are not going to need waivers in a year or two.
I would take him also. The more the better, as long as they don't get much if any money.
Looks like you were right about B1G, IAChief.
From FLO....
<< FloWrestling has been able to confirm through the Renteria family that Jason has been granted a full release, including Big 10 schools.>>
They say he's still undecided about where to go at this point.
Meh....lucky guess
Never go against @IAChief32. Never.Looks like you were right about B1G, IAChief.
From FLO....
<< FloWrestling has been able to confirm through the Renteria family that Jason has been granted a full release, including Big 10 schools.>>
They say he's still undecided about where to go at this point.
@IAChief32 may or may not be writing for FloNever go against @IAChief32. Never.
@IAChief32 may or may not be writing for Flo
https://www.flowrestling.org/articles/6207373-jason-renteria-being-pursued-by-iowa
Unless DeSanto redshirts to have two years at 41, you are correct. Also have to remember that Renteria is still a possibility in all of this. The same plan would work with him. Looking at it all, one could go:
2019
Lee
DeSanto (Renteria Shirt)
Murin, Happel, Turk
Lugo
2020
Lee (Oly Shirt?)/Cashman
DeSanto (RS?), Renteria, Cashman
Murin, Happel, Turk
Lugo
2021
Lee
Cashman
DeSanto/Renteria
Murin/Happel/Renteria
These are just a few ideas.
Fair point. How do you rank our 133-141-pounders in terms of likelihood to win an NCAA title? For the sake of argument include Renteria.I would certainly welcome JRent to the team and think he would make us better. One has to worry about how much scholly $ we are putting into 133 and 141 (and 149 two years from now) with DeSanto, Cashman, Renteria (if he comes), Turk, Happel, and Murin. All are very good/great, but that is 6 guys probably with mid AA potential for two/three weights - none are screaming NC. I love DeSanto's potential and I think he could be in the NC discussion in a couple years, but I I don't see that in the others. I would rather have 1 or 2 absolute hammers - even if it takes a year or two. This influx makes the chance of us getting a hammer at these two weights much less likely due to scholarship money limitations.
Yup ! Just have Kennedy’s $$$ ready for him Im all amped up its gonna a greaaat yearIt’s simple. Others will loose and/or a reduction in scholarships as they become juniors, seniors and don’t start.
Fair point. How do you rank our 133-141-pounders in terms of likelihood to win an NCAA title? For the sake of argument include Renteria.
Nope.It’s simple. Others will loose and/or a reduction in scholarships as they become juniors, seniors and don’t start.
It can be increased for whatever reason the coaches want but not reduced because of lack of athletic production.Just curious if it is OK to stipulate that they will, for example, get 0.5 scholly if they AA a previous year, 0.4 scholly if they were a starter at the BTT, or 0.2 scholly if they are a nonstarter the prior year?
Or does it have to be, for example, a 0.5 scholly/year regardless if they are a NC or nonstarter?
Are they able to increase a scholly from 0.3 to 0.5 if there is more available or if they want to reward a wrestler for better performance?
I would certainly welcome JRent to the team and think he would make us better. One has to worry about how much scholly $ we are putting into 133 and 141 (and 149 two years from now) with DeSanto, Cashman, Renteria (if he comes), Turk, Happel, and Murin. All are very good/great, but that is 6 guys probably with mid AA potential for two/three weights - none are screaming NC. I love DeSanto's potential and I think he could be in the NC discussion in a couple years, but I I don't see that in the others. I would rather have 1 or 2 absolute hammers - even if it takes a year or two. This influx makes the chance of us getting a hammer at these two weights much less likely due to scholarship money limitations.
Whoa Spooner dont get soft on us “unlikely” that is not the Spooner we all know and love. Just busting chops I agree though I would imagine those guys are on or will be min. Sports scholly money. I would love to be a fly on the wall when TnT and Co. are making these Decisions.It is unlikely guys like Cashman and Turk are getting significant scholarship money.
It can be increased for whatever reason the coaches want but not reduced because of lack of athletic production.
So a coach can start a kid with minimal money with incentives based on production.
Friends of the programThanks.
There is no limit on the amount of slush money that can be given or withdrawn based on performance though, is that correct? The NCAA does not regulate that from what I am gathering.
I thought the consensus was everyone is feeling pretty good about Kennedy for 174 in a few years and thinking we could manage until then? Or is he projected at 184?Agree, we need to spend dough at 174
Of course you would. You're a Northwestern fan.I would take JRent in a heartbeat, although Murin is going to AA at some point.
Nope.
https://www.athleticbusiness.com/go...wer-conference-to-guarantee-scholarships.html
"The Big Ten has become the first major conference to guarantee scholarships to all student-athletes through the duration of an athlete's enrollment at one of its universities.
Any student-athlete recruited to a Big Ten institution through the offer of an athletic scholarship will be guaranteed the following throughout the course of their enrollment:
- The scholarship will neither be reduced nor cancelled provided he or she remains a member in good standing with the community, the university and the athletics department."
It just means coaches have to be even more prudent. I think there is an increase of kids being urged to "retire" for medical reasons. These are the kids that didn't meet expectations, likely won't start or meet those expectations going forward, would have gotten reductions years ago and got "injured". They get to keep their aid and it doesn't go against the 9.9So papa, how does this change the structure of scholarship money promises in real life these days? Old days, I am assuming a wrestler was promised, say, 0.5 scholly and told it could vary year to year if they are not a starter and could increase if they are NC,etc.
Does that same wrestler now get promised 0.2 or 0.3 scholly and told that it could increase if they are a starter, etc. Seems like any promise of scholarship money these days has to be based on their floor and not average expectation as it cannot be reduced.
This rule makes a lot more sense for FB and BB where the scholarship cap isn't as important.
He still has to beat Turk. He's not a 133 pounder. Unclear why Turk keeps getting dissed. I think Turk beats them both in the room.