He most likely received his healthcare through the UIHC. That is university related.
Jacori Temeer
- Thread starter nw-iowa
- Start date
I saw teemer, looks like the leg is still attached so he will not be descending down to 125 it appears.
Yea, but you are an inmate at a correctional Psych ward aren't you?
Not today… (Can’t make predictions for tomorrow.)Yea, but you are an inmate at a correctional Psych ward aren't you?
FWIW in the post tournament presser, Tom said Jacori is making good progress and expects him back during B1G dual season.
also much safer than Iowa City at any point in the year.
He looked good trotting up the stairs last night at SS. No noticeable limp. Excited to see him back in action!
Hamstrings are tricky Best to make sure its healed up good before getting back to competition.
Teemer is one tough Hombre and he is going to push himself extremely hard to be ready to go.
Teemer is one tough Hombre and he is going to push himself extremely hard to be ready to go.
If he comes back too soon and tweaks it again, it is season over. Have to be sure it is 100% if possible before he comes back imo.
When does IOWA really need him back? Maybe against OKie st.??? I guess possibly Nebraska??? Okie st is the last dual so it would be a good place IF getting healthy takes that long?
Otherwise he can just do what he needs to to get to B1Gs, and honestly IF there is a question? Winning that dual might not be that important- UNLESS you bring in BO plus crew to watch the HAWKS win in front of a JAMMED packed LOUD crowd of 16K+++!!!!
Otherwise he can just do what he needs to to get to B1Gs, and honestly IF there is a question? Winning that dual might not be that important- UNLESS you bring in BO plus crew to watch the HAWKS win in front of a JAMMED packed LOUD crowd of 16K+++!!!!
I was told February ish. So that checks out. Never quite know with these things, but I’m happy for him and the hawks that he should be back this year.
I mean it’s possible we all are. I think I’m blowing off work writing meaningless messages on an Iowa wrestling board, but it’s within the realm of possibility that I’m in a white padded room, coloring, and saying, “I wuv restling” over and over again.Yea, but you are an inmate at a correctional Psych ward aren't you?
The only people that think they’re sane are the ones that know there’s a chance they might not be. And there’s your introductory psych for the day fellas and laddies!
So is Iran. TR Foley...this you?
Not even in the top 25. Why so esceered?
He has 3 matches (all at 157, all D-1 opponents, none against a teammate), with a 2-1 record.
Conference allocation and at large ranking are too complicated to completely address here. Suffice to say, it's best to have 15 matches. Barring 15, next best is 8. So he needs 12 or 5 more, respectively.
Different conference allocation / at large ranking criteria require a minimum of matches. As examples, a minimum 8 D-1 at the weight not against a teammate, the last being within 30 days, is required for a coaches' ranking. Similarly, a minimum of 15 is required for an RPI calculation and 8 for a winning percentage calculation.
To earn a pre-allocated spot for the conference (winner of tournament doesn't count, as they automatically qualify for NCAAs), a wrestler must have a minimum of 8 matches. That means matches during the B1G tournament cannot be considered for this.
It also seems one has to be formally identified as the starter to have their winning % and RPI calculated. I only mention this, because there has been some speculation of intentional or unintentional Iowa clerical errors in the past, which didn't update their NCAA D-1 Starters Page.
Regardless, Jacori could always 'steal' a conference allocation earned by another B1G 157lber. And he has to participate in the B1G tournament (i.e. step on the mat) to be eligible for NCAAs. This may be his best route, if he does not return until late in the season.
Seeding for the NCAA tournament depends to some extent on the final coaches' ranking, which may be the biggest wildcard.
Last edited:
Don't forget that the earned allocation is for the conference, not the individual wrestler. You still have to place in the allocated spots at the big tens to earn the right to go to the ncaa tournament. ie, if the conference has 5 allocated spots, the top 5 at big tens goes to ncaa, irrespective of which wrestlers earned the allocations.
1st place is considered an Automatic Qualifier. If the conference has 5 allocations that should mean placements thru 6th go onto NCAAs. That's how the NCAA rules discuss it.
Under this example, places 7th and beyond would need to rely on the at large process, which uses a ranking formula.
Hmmm. A quick search would tell you that HIPPA doesn't only apply to Healthcare Orgs and professionals. Medical records are the personal property of the patient and any disclosure by anyone must be authorized by the patient or their representative. There are exceptions but those are basically national security, imminent danger and criminality. Fortunately, the desire to know by sports fans isn't among them.
This is all dumb. It's a sports injury relax. I swear Tom just likes to keep it stirred up versus quieting the indians.
I own a health care company. The rule of thumb is that no one gets any info unless expressly permitted by the patient, which occurs only for very close family members.
Last edited:
Why does he need to “quiet the Indians”? Nowhere in his job description is it stated he must appease the whims of a fan base.
How many fans donate enough money to actually demand the attention of a head coach? Most who do can pick up a phone to call.
That’s quite a leap. I can’t imagine that’s in a fans decision metric for donating significant amounts of money. If anything it would b the other way around
141 is an anomaly this year.
I hope Block is just dinged up and is getting acclimated to the weight still.
Then we have Schreiver go toe to toe with a former AA ranked 6th that won the SS. I have no idea what happened to him on the back side but against Navy he looked like he could be ready to take the starting spot at 41. We have some really talented guys that have just not put it all together yet, but the clock is ticking!
not true.
if the B1G has 5 allocations at 157, places 1 thru 5 go.
6th place, etc, need a WC
I understand the rules don't treat auto qualifier (1st place) as a conference allocation by ranking algorithm, although people who make shortcut tables usually do.
"For each wrestler that reached the threshold in at least two of the three categories, his conference tournament was awarded a qualifying spot in that weight class."
"Each conference is awarded a minimum of one automatic qualification per weight class, which will go to the tournament champion, even if they did not have any wrestlers reach at least two of the three thresholds."
Ergo, qualifying spot <> conference champion.
Number of qualifying spots per ranking algorithm >= 1 must subtract 1 pre-allocation for conference champion (automatic qualifier). Else it is zero.
Last edited:
You guys are just talking past each other a bit.
To be precise:
Allocations = Automatic Qualifier + Pre-Allocation Spots
So when you same AQ is separate from Allocations that is not quite correct. AQ is a subset of Allocations and separate from pre-allocations.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
2027 In-State Priority Tight End Luke Brewer Talks Iowa, Recruitment
- Latest: Eliot Clough