ADVERTISEMENT

Josh Dix

I’ll never blame a kid for taking the bag in this ****ed up system.
What I have a problem with is that he and Freeman were both rumored to go to Creighton back in January. I have heard that I was always Creighton but obviously he did take some other visits. It’s the quitting on your team and thinking about where you’re gonna transfer with two months left in the season that makes him a little bitch in my eyes so he can **** off. I hope he sucks balls next year. And I guarantee Creighton overpaid for him and I won’t be cheering for those tampering bastards.
It went like this: Creighton's booster heard Josh was considering transferring to his home town. Josh's agent said let's see the money. And said, if you throw in enough $$$$ we will get in Owen's ear and see if Creighton can land'em both. Josh got a little recruiting bonus for referring Owen...

maybe, just maybe.
 
Did you miss all the Juju commercials during the tournament coverage? Also, Flajae Johnson from LSU had a couple. Hy-Vee also featured Audie Crooks in a commercial.
Local TV in San Diego has a few athletes in commercials for local businesses.
 
Or any game when someone gets after him defensively. Disappearing act
I thought I heard that Josh was sick on the trip to CA. I think he sat the entire second half. Hard to play defense 1 or 2 on 5. Thelwell was the other + defender. Several were not even close to average.
 
The most disgusting part of this, is the reference to "his agent". I'm ambivalent at best about whether a 20 year old college kid needs an agent, but because the NCAA or whoever is in charge has sat back and done nothing to put some controls on this we've arrived at this point in college athletics. But, since we're here, at a bare minimum, they need to do something about these agents. The NFL has standards for agents. They must be certified before they can represent players. They need to impose standards on these people.

From what I can tell, I don't think the NCAA has any requirements on agents. So some are getting ridiculous percentages, with no governors on their conduct. For example, shopping players before they're even in the portal, lying to schools/collectives only to drive up the price of a player. Unfortunately, some schools/collectives are more than willing to play along. Whoever is in charge needs to get on top of this, at the very least. That should be tampering. And if an agent is involved in it, he should be suspended from representing players. If those in charge (is there anyone in charge?) continue to do nothing, it will only get worse.

Final point, the idea of NIL as the basis for a college athlete to earn some money is so quaint, as this pay for play has gotten so far beyond what I believe the original intention was. All the NCAA had to do 15 years ago (or whenever it was) was to agree to provide Ed O'Bannon some small royalty for using his image (and any other player), but they decided to play hard ball, and got it stuffed up their behind. Now the NCAA sits in the corner whimpering, unwilling and unable to do anything. And we're left with this mess.
There is no one in charge. The Supreme Court told the ncaa they have no authority.

The ncaa only ever had the authority that the schools gave them anyway.

There's no legal way to have some NIL, it's all or nothing. Everyone used to understand this that's why it was all illegal.

It's the schools that should have been paying the players. If the schools wanted that to happen 20 years ago it would have happened.
 
I get that.

I also think these schools are contacting players in season and when they offer 7 figures….itd be pretty hard to ignore.

If the players instigated the contact…bad on them. I think it’s reasonable to assume the schools instigated the contact or at least their collectives.
There's a simple fix for players who instigated contact, be it the player, agent, or family: automatic ineligibility for remainder of season for said player if the school decides. No more room, board, tuition, books, whatever. It effectively renders said player ineligible for NEXT school for "lack of academic progress".

For teams that do it? Same. No post-season once contact is established/proven/admitted.

For agents? Immediate DQ from representing any and all college players.
 
They’re worth what someone is willing to pay.
No, not in this case anyway.

Owen showed his true colors by coming in fat and out of shape last year then pulled a pussy move quitting on his team. Dix is streaky and while a nice player he disappears way too often.

Similar to the housing market there are jackasses willing to pay far above true market value because they’re fortunate enough to have the funds to do so, not realizing they’ll never get their investment back down the road.
 
There's a simple fix for players who instigated contact, be it the player, agent, or family: automatic ineligibility for remainder of season for said player if the school decides. No more room, board, tuition, books, whatever. It effectively renders said player ineligible for NEXT school for "lack of academic progress".

For teams that do it? Same. No post-season once contact is established/proven/admitted.

For agents? Immediate DQ from representing any and all college players.
Unfortunately there seem to be no guard rails in place at the moment.

Needs to be fixed.
 
Just think his agent gets 20%.

$400K their fans paid some no name leach agent.
Regardless of the cut, I don't think people truly understand that some of the money they're paying these collectives is going to these agents' cuts of each..."NIL"...deal they help get players.

I wonder if they knew just how much money was going not to the players they think they're helping "buy", but to blood-sucking leeches who are looking to get the highest deals, not only for the player, but also to inflate their cut of the deal as well.........

Just another reason why I won't flip a single dime towards any collective, regardless of how big a tantrum people like @RicoSuave102954 throw about fans not contributing. 🤷‍♂️
 
Sounds like Dix took visit to ILL and listening to an offer from IU to leverage more $ from creighton‘s initial offer.
 
Regardless of the cut, I don't think people truly understand that some of the money they're paying these collectives is going to these agents' cuts of each..."NIL"...deal they help get players.

I wonder if they knew just how much money was going not to the players they think they're helping "buy", but to blood-sucking leeches who are looking to get the highest deals, not only for the player, but also to inflate their cut of the deal as well.........

Just another reason why I won't flip a single dime towards any collective, regardless of how big a tantrum people like @RicoSuave102954 throw about fans not contributing. 🤷‍♂️
I don’t like it at all. I’ve contributed, but I’m re-thinking it. One thing that Heinrichs and Tyler Barnes have said is that an agent or recruit starts with how much am I going to get, they’re done with that agent or player. I do like that approach, at least it’s something. So, I’ll probably stay a sap and give but I don’t fault those who don’t want to. I get it.
 
Regardless of the cut, I don't think people truly understand that some of the money they're paying these collectives is going to these agents' cuts of each..."NIL"...deal they help get players.

I wonder if they knew just how much money was going not to the players they think they're helping "buy", but to blood-sucking leeches who are looking to get the highest deals, not only for the player, but also to inflate their cut of the deal as well.........

Just another reason why I won't flip a single dime towards any collective, regardless of how big a tantrum people like @RicoSuave102954 throw about fans not contributing. 🤷‍♂️
That's your choice but keep quiet when the team goes sub .500 because they just can't compete. I like our new coaching staff but he's not Norman Dale.
 
I don’t like it at all. I’ve contributed, but I’m re-thinking it. One thing that Heinrichs and Tyler Barnes have said is that an agent or recruit starts with how much am I going to get, they’re done with that agent or player. I do like that approach, at least it’s something. So, I’ll probably stay a sap and give but I don’t fault those who don’t want to. I get it.
Somehow, I don't believe you understand how it works. The agent gets a cut out of whatever the school pays the player. That'a a deal between the player and the agent not the school. I'm not sure if every player hires an agent some may have a familty memberr or preacher (an Al Sharpton type) do the negotiating.
 
Last edited:
Somehow, I don't believe you understand how it works. The agent gets a cut out of whatever the school pays the player. That'a a deal between the player and the agent not the school. I'm not sure if every player hires an agent some may have a familty memberr or preacher (an Al Sharpton type) do the negotiating.
So, if I give $1000 to the Swarm, which is used, along with other funds, to pay a player to come to Iowa, and that player has an agent charging 20%, effectively $200 of my money is going to that agent. I think I get how it works. I want agents out of this or at a bare minimum, regulated. Their unregulated conduct, lying and misrepresenting themselves and their player’s offers drives the price up for everyone. Including the donors. But hey, thanks.
 
So, if I give $1000 to the Swarm, which is used, along with other funds, to pay a player to come to Iowa, and that player has an agent charging 20%, effectively $200 of my money is going to that agent. I think I get how it works. I want agents out of this or at a bare minimum, regulated. Their unregulated conduct, lying and misrepresenting themselves and their player’s offers drives the price up for everyone. Including the donors. But hey, thanks.
100% goes to the player, how the player spends it is of no consequence. Would you at some point balk that the player used the money to buy a Tesla and since you hate on Elon Musk consider that you paid money to Elon Musk?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT