Was he ready last year?!?!?Kris wasn’t ready as a freshman and you know it.
Was he ready last year?!?!?Kris wasn’t ready as a freshman and you know it.
Ulis isn't transferring because he is afraid guys that have played very little or not at all are going to take his minutes. He is transferring because it has been made clear Fran's system isn't what best suits his game and his development has suffered due to this.
100% agreeWas he ready last year?!?!?
It’s a good thing you’ll accept it. It’s coming but it could be a couple years.I could accept a down year with young players on the learning curve as long as they develop.
Because I watched him play and struggle whenever he did get on the court. It's OK - he worked and got better. I'm not sure why everyone thinks stars are stars from day 1. Are you forgetting too that literally he had very few D-1 offers and Fran was crucified for giving a scholly to him? Or is that going to be revisionist history now as well?How can you conclusively say this?
there is zero evidence to,support this statement
Just watch, he is an Iowa GA next season, an assistant until Fran retires, and then is named the next Iowa head coach at age 31. Then, 44 years later as the Iowa head coach, he retires at age 75.
This way, he is here, essentially, forever.
Just for you, Daisy Mae.
It's a small sample size, but in the 3 or 4 WV games I watched Joe T was on the bench at the end of the game. He played more minutes than he did at Iowa, but it seemed like Huggins had the same concerns with Joe T as Fran did in crunch time.The 30 minutes is just a number. The real issue was playing Bohannon over him and not trusting Joe T. Joe T finished games with WV this year and he didn't do that with Fran.
Kris was the 2nd best player on the team his sophomore year? That's pretty debatable considering he was 4th on the team in scoring and at least 3rd in rebounding. Tell me, where did Kris fit in his freshman year? I suggest you go back and watch the end of games when he did get in. He wasn't ready. That is no discredit to him because he worked and got better.100% agree
@ChiPackHawk question, how can kris not be ready at the end of a season and be the 2nd best player on team the next year, on,y second to a lotto pick? Please explain your thinking??
@Steamboat529529 is correct
Loved Joe T. Wish he was here this season. But the 21-22 season turned around when Fran moved JT back to a bench role and started Bohannon at the 1 and Perk at the 2.It's a small sample size, but in the 3 or 4 WV games I watched Joe T was on the bench at the end of the game. He played more minutes than he did at Iowa, but it seemed like Huggins had the same concerns with Joe T as Fran did in crunch time.
Maybe his metrics were good because he played in only 2-3 minute increments. To me, it looked like Josh could barely get up and down the court after a couple of minutes. JMO, but I believe his performance would have dropped off dramatically (particularly on the defensive end), if he had to play longer stretches.Ogundele led this IOWA team in defense metric, and we saw him do this against Eddy, Kofi and the best big guys he had the chance to play against.
but Fran won’t have him around next year and will be forced to go with inferior player from the Ohio valley conference, with out looking, can you name 2 teams in that conference?
He was in at the end of many of the games I watched and I caught about 10It's a small sample size, but in the 3 or 4 WV games I watched Joe T was on the bench at the end of the game. He played more minutes than he did at Iowa, but it seemed like Huggins had the same concerns with Joe T as Fran did in crunch time.
correlation doesn't equal causation. Better shooting happened for jordan and it wasn't because of perkins. I also recall that when the subs came in we often looked better and played better defense.Loved Joe T. Wish he was here this season. But the 21-22 season turned around when Fran moved JT back to a bench role and started Bohannon at the 1 and Perk at the 2.
And that's really not debatable.
I do agree there is very small samples sets, no question,Maybe his metrics were good because he played in only 2-3 minute increments. To me, it looked like Josh could barely get up and down the court after a couple of minutes. JMO, but I believe his performance would have dropped off dramatically (particularly on the defensive end), if he had to play longer stretches.
Do you even watch the games?I thought the Murray twins were horrible in the Richmond game. That could have been the difference in that game right there.
I'd hate to see how you would describe the play of everyone not named Keegan if you think Kris struggled whenever he got on the court.Because I watched him play and struggle whenever he did get on the court. It's OK - he worked and got better. I'm not sure why everyone thinks stars are stars from day 1. Are you forgetting too that literally he had very few D-1 offers and Fran was crucified for giving a scholly to him? Or is that going to be revisionist history now as well?
Terrible post. Both guys appeared to be great teammates and stayed out of trouble. Wish them well and move on.Who would take his fat ass.
The caveat with that highlight reel is that he looks good against Iowa's D. Not that high of a bar, actually.The reasoning is probably Amarion Nimmers
Check out his highlights and the discussion here:
Amarion Nimmers Practice Highlights are IMPRESSIVE. On Aug 3, enters Transfer Portal
Driving and dishing. Nailing 3's. Driving and pulling up for mid range jumpers. Easily beating defenders off the dribble. Impressive hops. My god, he even makes Mulvey look good. ;) Check this out & watch:iowa.forums.rivals.com
Not to mention Gilyard just shredded our backcourt in that Richmond game. Backdoor cut after backdoor cut. 🤦♂️Do you even watch the games?
Murray twins 54 minutes 14 rebounds 4 Assists 24 points
Conner and Jbo 56 minutes 5 rebounds 6 assists 6 points.
But lets blame the Murray twins for not being good enough to overcome Frans blunder of using Conner at all and specifically Conner with JBO.
Haha. This made me chuckle.I'd hate to see how you would describe the play of everyone not named Keegan if you think Kris struggled whenever he got on the court.
Friend, Josh O wasn't it. He was never going to be it. He physically was exhausted after 2 minutes on the court. How is this your fight?Umm, how? Braun playing in Ohio Valley gets 7 points and 5 rebounds is an upgrade? How?
in Ogundeles only chance at extended minutes at Purdue, in 16 minutes Josh had 7 and 5 vs the very best big men in the country
ogundele led Iowa in defensive metrics by a huge margin.
it’s not his fault Fran mis-used him, and we know that Fran is guilty every year of misusing better players in favor of his kids.
Once again - as a freshman! On the 2020/21 team. If you think he was ready at that time there is really nothing I can say to change that. By the logic of so many is he should have taken minutes away from JW because Joe wasn't drafted in the 1st round and Kris likely will be this upcoming draft. Or maybe Garza because he struggles to stay in the league. Or Connor for sure because we know he has no shot at the NBA and certainly would have gotten the ball to Garza better than him. Keegan too because, well just because. JBo, I'm sure Kris' ball handling abilities at that time made it just plain incompetence that he was not a starting point guard. Joe T had no business playing in front of him either because his on ball defense was inferior to Kris'. Michael Baer was a waste of time being on the floor because he was once a walk-on. Jack Nunge - no way! CJ - yep, Kris was certainly a better option at off guard at the time. Ah, then there is Patrick - no way because he was the coach's son. All should have stepped aside for the guy with 1-2 D-1 offers because everyone knew he was going to be the best player on the team as a junior, 2 1/2 years later, because he worked hard in the off seasons to get there. Yep - that's how it should have all played out.I'd hate to see how you would describe the play of everyone not named Keegan if you think Kris struggled whenever he got on the court.
Respectfully submitting a Question, How do you explain the Purdue performance? As it’s direct evidence against your assertion.Friend, Josh O wasn't it. He was never going to be it. He physically was exhausted after 2 minutes on the court. How is this your fight?
not just purdue but he played Cockburn and TCU. He was great against TCU. I'd say his good performances outnumbered his bad. I'm not saying he's a world beater but he should have got more play.Respectfully submitting a Question, How do you explain the Purdue performance? As it’s direct evidence against your assertion.
To be fair two things can be true at the same time. Fran didn't play him enough and he was out of shape. He was always sucking wind after 4 minutes of play. I don't think as a coach that means don't play him but he was definitely out of shape for a power 5 player. Again this is the Fran values offense over defense as to why Rebraca played so much this year. Short segments from big men to spell your big men is good coaching to me. Fran went small this year when Rebraca was out of the game and the majority of games it didn't work out. I don't blame Fran for his strategy because he clearly didn't trust Josh and Mulvey this year. I don't have enough evidence of their play to say that they should've played more.not just purdue but he played Cockburn and TCU. He was great against TCU. I'd say his good performances outnumbered his bad. I'm not saying he's a world beater but he should have got more play.
Everyone just defaults to fat and out of shape. Lazy argument.
It's a small sample size, but in the 3 or 4 WV games I watched Joe T was on the bench at the end of the game. He played more minutes than he did at Iowa, but it seemed like Huggins had the same concerns with Joe T as Fran did in crunch time.
Difference is this year we have $$ available. I feel pretty good about getting a starting level post transfer (better than Braun).Josh will be back when nobody picks him up and Fran will be happy to waste another scholarship on him.
The caveat with that highlight reel is that he looks good against Iowa's D. Not that high of a bar, actually.
11 minutes against TCU, for 0 points, 1 assist, 1 block and 2 TO's. That is great?not just purdue but he played Cockburn and TCU. He was great against TCU. I'd say his good performances outnumbered his bad. I'm not saying he's a world beater but he should have got more play.
Everyone just defaults to fat and out of shape. Lazy argument.
And in 2 career games against Illinois with cockburn, Josh had:11 minutes against TCU, for 0 points, 1 assist, 1 block and 2 TO's. That is great?
Josh will be back when nobody picks him up and Fran will be happy to waste another scholarship on him.
11 minutes against TCU, for 0 points, 1 assist, 1 block and 2 TO's. That is great?
When a back up big comes in you just expect him to hold his own. Which he did, otherwise he wouldn't have played 11 minutes against TCU.And in 2 career games against Illinois with cockburn, Josh had:
3 minutes, 0 points, 0 assists, 0 rebounds.
People only remember like 2-3 plays from Josh in 3 years and think he still has some sort of untapped potential. Fran has always been generous to a fault when it comes to dishing out playing time. If Josh still can't find the court under Fran, I will trust that he just doesn't have it.
In a game Iowa gets beat by 13,11 minutes against TCU, for 0 points, 1 assist, 1 block and 2 TO's. That is great?
Ulis isn't transferring because he is afraid guys that have played very little or not at all are going to take his minutes. He is transferring because it has been made clear Fran's system isn't what best suits his game and his development has suffered due to this.
I liked Josh when he matched up against the huge bigs.I am not sure that he fit into Frans system.When a back up big comes in you just expect him to hold his own. Which he did, otherwise he wouldn't have played 11 minutes against TCU.
If I told you a backup center had 2 points and 3 rebounds in 3 minutes against the 7'4" potential college player of the year, you might be inclined ask why they didn't play a little bit in games.
Let's not act like his #'s tell the only story of how he played in the game. Was josh some sort of all star fran forced to the bench, no. Did he warrant a few minutes here or there, yep.
Another possible argument would be that he entered the portal last year and it seems like no one was interested in him. And I really have to wonder if many will show much interest this year.not just purdue but he played Cockburn and TCU. He was great against TCU. I'd say his good performances outnumbered his bad. I'm not saying he's a world beater but he should have got more play.
Everyone just defaults to fat and out of shape. Lazy argument.
Scoring and getting the and 1 vs POY isn’t really garbage time in B1G TourneyYou can't use efficiency ratings to describe Josh. His sample size isn't very large. Many of his minutes in his career were in garbage time against scrub teams. He had a couple of extended runs in his career against good teams where he showed promise.
What you can use is the eyeball test. He could only play about 2 or 3 minutes of game time in our up and down the court offense before being gassed. What we don't know is how long he needed on the bench to rest before coming back in. Either way, this wasn't the offense that was going to work for him. He was a good teammate and there shouldn't be hard feelings from any fan.
If anything we all should be wondering why Fran gave him a scholarship in the first place knowing the style of play he coaches for. There's a reason most people here aren't upset that Bluder didn't get Audi Crooks to commit when she likely would struggle staying in the game with Bluder's fast-scoring offense.