I get what you’re saying but is justice amplified by this story having a larger national audience? Does the victim or his family feel better because it is a bigger story? I don’t know but I doubt it.
As far as education and deterrence. I question whether people really need to be educated to not forcefully shove a pencil into an anus. If that is a needed educational point in this country then we are farther gone than I even thought.
What I meant by deterrence is that “What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas” is a mythical concept, that even locker-room hijincks are not private . . . i.e., what you do will be known and could be on the national news for all to see (and judge) — and then you have to deal with how that affects you and your parents (if you have parents who care, and you care about how they feel about you . . . and you actually care about yourself — all definitely caveats). Being a rather private person who cares about himself and his relationship with his parents, I can see how that might be an effective deterrent. Think the “permanent record” example discussed previously, but with actual teeth.
Edication-wise . . . I’m sorry to say, some people do not believe or understand that hazing and/or bullying are wrong. Keeping such behavior low-profile (i.e., local) runs the risk of sending a signal that “it is wrong, but not
that wrong”, if you get what I mean. Think the “boys will be boys” saying.
Most people cannot understand how anyone could
possibly see the pencil example as anything
but wrong . . . unfortunately, some see such things as “acceptable” wrongs — i.e., they know it isn’t exactly right, but they aren’t going to melt down over it, either. Think the “I got hazed when I was a kid, and it made me tough . . . so this generation should do the same” mentality. In this regard, “universal truths” (i.e., you don’t
ever do certain things to others without their consent) is a necessary form of education. Universal admonishment of violations is a deterrent.
But I get your point, too. As a rather misanthropic person, I lean toward the “yes, we are that far gone” end of the spectrum.
Justice-wise . . . I don’t know if the victim
or family will feel better if this goes national. They may be private for all I know. But I can imagine how they might feel worse if the incident is treated in a hush-hush manner.
Edit: Oh, and to be clear, I am not advocating for any particular type of coverage — I’d defer to victim for that. Just pointing out some benefits to national coverage that I happen to believe outweigh the near-term consequences of a possible black eye for the sport of wrestling.