He’s saying having two kids being coached by their dadBe careful now, more than one dad has 2 kids on the team.
And to blame CMac for CJ's departure is ludicrous.
He’s saying having two kids being coached by their dadBe careful now, more than one dad has 2 kids on the team.
And to blame CMac for CJ's departure is ludicrous.
Be careful now, more than one dad has 2 kids on the team.
And to blame CMac for CJ's departure is ludicrous.
As you can see, his starting 5 is:
Joe T
Kris Murray
PMac
Keegan
Filip
Not sure what the difference is between CJ leaving because CMac is playing and CMac getting playing time. Are yiu saying that CMac took minutes away from CJ?I didn't blame CMac for CJ's departure, I said his playing time probably had something to do with it. The main reason players transfer is playing time.
On point 1, it's about the COACH having two kids on the team and the possible perception of preferential treatment that comes with that. (right or wrong)
He took minutes away from everyone not named Garza, Bohannon or Wieskamp. He averaged the 5th most minutes on the team, and all the advanced analytics had him as the 9th best player in the rotation. People notice this stuff, especially when they or their kids aren't playing as much as they would like.Not sure what the difference is between CJ leaving because CMac is playing and CMac getting playing time. Are yiu saying that CMac took minutes away from CJ?
So you believe that Iowa would have been better without him, right?He took minutes away from everyone not named Garza, Bohannon or Wieskamp. He averaged the 5th most minutes on the team, and all the advanced analytics had him as the 9th best player in the rotation. People notice this stuff, especially when they or their kids aren't playing as much as they would like.
He took minutes away from everyone not named Garza, Bohannon or Wieskamp. He averaged the 5th most minutes on the team, and all the advanced analytics had him as the 9th best player in the rotation. People notice this stuff, especially when they or their kids aren't playing as much as they would like.
As Dodger said, by all analytics, he was our 9th best player. And received 5th best minutes. People notice. The players clearly also know.So CJ, who is 4th in mpg, is mad at Connor (5th mpg) for taking away his playing time and transferred?
To add, Connor was 3rd in mpg in 2019-20 at 30 mpg, which dropped to 5th in mpg at 22mpg.
As Dodger said, by all analytics, he was our 9th best player. And received 5th best minutes. People notice. The players clearly also know.
So you believe that Iowa would have been better without him, right?
Yes.So you believe that Iowa would have been better without him, right?
I'll go there. If you're asking would Iowa have been better without CMac vs CMac getting 23 minutes per game? Absolutely. IMO Keegan, Perkins, PMac and JT should have been collecting at least 10-15 of those minutes between them and the team would have been better down the stretch and today had that been the case.So you believe that Iowa would have been better without him, right?
I am just trying to understand what your effing point is.You make a hobby out of trying to put words in other people's mouths. Give it a rest.
At least you are honest.I'll go there. If you're asking would Iowa have been better without CMac vs CMac getting 23 minutes per game? Absolutely. IMO Keegan, Perkins, PMac and JT should have been collecting at least 10-15 of those minutes between them and the team would have been better down the stretch and today had that been the case.
This is in no way a slam on CMac personally. Seems like a great kid and teammate. I'm sure he works hard on his game and he seems to give great effort. He simply doesn't have the offensive or defensive skills or athletic ability that others on the team possess. He can't rebound, dribble drive, shoot, or play disruptive defense. He's too small and unathletic at the 3-4 and too slow with no threat to shoot at a guard spot. Last I checked those were all pretty important things in the game of basketball. I'm not blaming Fran either as he's his son and I'd probably be doing the same thing he's been doing. It's his team and it's up to him who plays.
We're not talking about logic.So CJ, who is 4th in mpg, is mad at Connor (5th mpg) for taking away his playing time and transferred?
To add, Connor was 3rd in mpg in 2019-20 at 30 mpg, which dropped to 5th in mpg at 22mpg.
Connor was required to play heavy minutes in ‘19-20 because Nunge and Bohannon were injured and our only other options were an ineffective Pemsl or playing a two big lineup with Kriener and Garza. We needed Kriener to spell Garza so Connor started at the 4, and we needed Connor to spell Toussaint at PG after Bohannon called it quits. So he played 30 minutes between two positions out of necessity... and it made senseSo CJ, who is 4th in mpg, is mad at Connor (5th mpg) for taking away his playing time and transferred?
To add, Connor was 3rd in mpg in 2019-20 at 30 mpg, which dropped to 5th in mpg at 22mpg.
I am just trying to understand what your effing point is.
That’s not a starting 5. He elaborated on that in the lounge
Is it really saying that is the starting lineup? To me it looks like he saying that would be a lineup that they could play but I can’t see all the dialogue.
He specifically stated it wasn’t a starting 5Every year this forum has numerous starting line up threads; it's a popular topic.
It's a popular topic on Twitter, too. Rick Webster clearly tweeted his starting line up. Then Kenyon replied with his line up.
And if you are coming off the bench, that would mean you are not in the starting 5, correct? Well, as you can see in the orig post, someone IMMEDIATELY wrote this after Kenyon posted his line up: No jbo? I mean I like your line up but Connor and jbo coming off bench, Fran won’t have that will he?
And Kenyon's reply? Why not?
So, he appears to be fine with JBo and Connor not starting. And he WAS talking about the starting line up.
So, you can see why everyone in that thread thought they were all still talking starting line ups.
As you stated, Kenyon had to later explain it was simply a "line up" and not his starting line up.
Meanwhile, as you can see below, everyone else replied as if they were still talking STARTING line ups. Rick, who started the topic, even wrote that he wasn’t sure if you put 3 guys with similar skill sets in your starting lineup.
Sooo am I the only one who didn’t know CM was having double hip surgery? If that’s the case, and with his limited skill set, don’t see any way he starts.I’d rather see Perkins at the 2 with Joe T and Ulis splitting time at the point. JBo spells Perkins and Connor will be coming off of double hip surgery so doubt he sees a starting line up when he doesn’t bring anything to the offensive end of the court.
Love the line up the Murray brothers starting with Filip at the 5. That’s an athletic team with Patrick added to the mix too. Fran has got to start the youth movement immediately so the guys are seasoned by tournament time as this will be a much more athletic team. Can you imagine if Weizy were to come back? Highly doubt it but you never know.
He specifically stated it wasn’t a starting 5
ThisWhy are you claiming Kenyon said that should be the starting line up when he clearly did not do so?
Kenyon disagree's.Again, everyone in that Twitter thread was talking the starting line up, so when Kenyon proposed his line up, I can see why everyone was looking at it as his starting line up.
and then someone replied to Kenyon about his line up but doubted Fran would leave Connor and JBo out of the starting line up, Kenyon, of course, replied to that starting line up question with "why not?"
So, Kenyon is fine with JBo and Connor out of the starting line up. And it is clear he likes the line up of Joe T, Kris, Patrick. Keegan and Filip. Whether or not those 5 actually become Fran's starting 5 this fall will be the question.
Did I say it was a STARTING LINEUP????? Read the post correctly.
Kenyon disagree's.
You can bold anything you want but you're full of crap on this. Kenyon thinks you need to learn to read by the way.
Kenyon disagree's.
You can bold anything you want but you're full of crap on this. Kenyon thinks you need to learn to read by the way.
Again, everyone in that Twitter thread was talking the starting line up, so when Kenyon proposed his line up, I can see why everyone was looking at it as his starting line up.
and then someone replied to Kenyon about his line up but doubted Fran would leave Connor and JBo out of the starting line up, Kenyon, of course, replied to that starting line up question with "why not?"
So, Kenyon is fine with JBo and Connor out of the starting line up. And it is clear he likes the line up of Joe T, Kris, Patrick. Keegan and Filip. Whether or not those 5 actually become Fran's starting 5 this fall will be the question.
I enjoy Kenyon's input on these boards because it's pretty rare for players parents to provide that input.Its too bad in that starting line up Twitter thread that when he posted his line up he was not clear that it was only a line up and not "the" starting line up.
Because lets face it, THE starting line up was all that people were discussing, INCLUDING Kenyon, when he said he was fine with JBo and Connor not being part of THE starting line up.
And speaking of being full of crap, try not to be so outraged over this and take a laxative or something.
Kenyon disagree's.
You can bold anything you want but you're full of crap on this. Kenyon thinks you need to learn to read by the way.
I enjoy Kenyon's input on these boards because it's pretty rare for players parents to provide that input.
The reason it's rare is guys like you misquoting statements for their own agenda's.
Please stop doubling down on stupid.
PLEASE TELL EVERYONE WHERE EDDY says "STARTING LINEUP" IN HIS POST?
Who's Eddy?
And again, he replied to a starting line up with his line up.
Enough with the fake outrage.
What does your allegiance to Iowa State have to do with this?My allegiance aside, does anyone really think Fran is gonna bench his own son, and a proven starter (who holds two two Iowa records)? Yes, they both have limitations, but if Touissant, Perkins, or Uhlis were better - they would've gotten more PT. This could get very interesting, if not ugly, for Fran. He isnt exactly famous for putting the best players on the floor (that's not my observation, its what I've read here on HR), and is loyal to a fault.
IronicWow. The outrage continues over the starting line up discussion that I shared from Twitter.
Please stop doubling down on your stupidity and your outrage.
The person that he responded with "why not".... Never does it say "starting lineup". Stop spewing fake news.
I like a lineup of JT, Pat, KrM, KeM, FR, PS. Did I say that I want that for the starting lineup or naw?
Who's Eddy?
And again, he replied to a starting line up with his line up.
Enough with the fake outrage.
DID I SAY STARTING LINEUP??????
Wow. The outrage continues over the starting line up discussion that I shared from Twitter.
Please stop doubling down on your stupidity and your outrage.
Did I say it was a STARTING LINEUP????? Read the post correctly.