there that should do itThat this thread won’t go political in the first 5 posts.
hey we did it! myth busted.That this thread won’t go political in the first 5 posts.
You really are an asshole.Many posters believe that the officials made the wrong call on the DeJean punt return. That is not true. The Big Ten confirmed that the correct call was made.
I was watching the 2001 fiesta bowl between Oregon State and Notre Dame, and OSU did the same thing and had an invalid fair catch called against them. It was called back AND had a 5 yard penalty tacked on.Many posters believe that the officials made the wrong call on the DeJean punt return. That is not true. The Big Ten confirmed that the correct call was made.
That's not a myth... that's the truth. Stick to myths please.You really are an asshole.
Many posters believe that the officials made the wrong call on the DeJean punt return. That is not true. The Big Ten confirmed that the correct call was made.
My reverse psychology worked!hey we did it! myth busted.
Many posters believe that the officials made the wrong call on the DeJean punt return. That is not true. The Big Ten confirmed that the correct call was made.
Wasn't the Clowney vs Michigan hit a penalty in game?What's hilarious is that same big 10 included that play in Cooper Dejean's highlight video after he got drafted.
I don't think I've ever seen a play that got legitimately wiped off the board included in a player's highlight video by the conference. Not the school, not fans, the conference.
I find the way the call was made to be far more infuriating than the actual call itself. If the officials on the field had waved it off immediately because they felt that DeJean's motions affected the play then, while I may not have agreed with it, I would have been able to accept it as bad judgement by the official. But it is undeniable that his arms were in fact moving. If Minnesota players had reacted to it then I probably would have agreed with the officials. But that's not what happened. The replay official stuck his nose into the play to call something that the replay wasn't even looking for. Something like that needs to be a call made by the official on the field, not the replay official.I was watching the 2001 fiesta bowl between Oregon State and Notre Dame, and OSU did the same thing and had an invalid fair catch called against them. It was called back AND had a 5 yard penalty tacked on.
Now I'm a little less vocal about it not being a fair catch.
No. They reviewed the fumble. Never reviewed any penalty.Wasn't the Clowney vs Michigan hit a penalty in game?
100% agreeI find the way the call was made to be far more infuriating than the actual call itself. If the officials on the field had waved it off immediately because they felt that DeJean's motions affected the play then, while I may not have agreed with it, I would have been able to accept it as bad judgement by the official. But it is undeniable that his arms were in fact moving. If Minnesota players had reacted to it then I probably would have agreed with the officials. But that's not what happened. The replay official stuck his nose into the play to call something that the replay wasn't even looking for. Something like that needs to be a call made by the official on the field, not the replay official.
I only know how to rank left to right. Anything other than that is unnecessary.That M1 is a valid ranking system.
That Iowa can compete in the new B1G without substantially upping their Swarm participation and donations.
What are some of the things people on GIA seem to believe that simply aren't true at all?
NO POLITICS
What are some of the things people on GIA seem to believe that simply aren't true at all?
NO POLITICS
Officials are never the ONLY reason a team loses a game...except for the 2006 Outback Bowl (while a horrid call, the refs didn't cost Iowa the game by canceling CDJ's punt return, Iowa's inept offense cost them the game).
I was watching the 2001 fiesta bowl between Oregon State and Notre Dame, and OSU did the same thing and had an invalid fair catch called against them. It was called back AND had a 5 yard penalty tacked on.
Now I'm a little less vocal about it not being a fair catch.
This. Had it been called on the field I could accept it. By doing so via replay, and then in a media follow up the next week conceding that 2 different camera angles showed two different things and still defending the call, THATS what makes me angry.I find the way the call was made to be far more infuriating than the actual call itself. If the officials on the field had waved it off immediately because they felt that DeJean's motions affected the play then, while I may not have agreed with it, I would have been able to accept it as bad judgement by the official. But it is undeniable that his arms were in fact moving. If Minnesota players had reacted to it then I probably would have agreed with the officials. But that's not what happened. The replay official stuck his nose into the play to call something that the replay wasn't even looking for. Something like that needs to be a call made by the official on the field, not the replay official.
I like to think of it this way: calling the punt return back and having Brian's lame offense not bailed out again by random lightning strikes may have been what Beth needed to terminate Brian. So, it was a fair trade, in my book.I find the way the call was made to be far more infuriating than the actual call itself. If the officials on the field had waved it off immediately because they felt that DeJean's motions affected the play then, while I may not have agreed with it, I would have been able to accept it as bad judgement by the official. But it is undeniable that his arms were in fact moving. If Minnesota players had reacted to it then I probably would have agreed with the officials. But that's not what happened. The replay official stuck his nose into the play to call something that the replay wasn't even looking for. Something like that needs to be a call made by the official on the field, not the replay official.
Also, there wasn't a single person in the stadium who even had that call on their radar, on either side. Everyone was thinking that he possibly stepped out of bounds, but as long as he stayed in bounds it was a touchdown.This. Had it been called on the field I could accept it. By doing so via replay, and then in a media follow up the next week conceding that 2 different camera angles showed two different things and still defending the call, THATS what makes me angry.
That and knowing we couldn’t gain 20 yards for a FG attempt.
FSU is ranked higher than Iowa.I always thought that Florida State was an inferior institution. But I have a really bright student who had many good options, but is choosing to attend FSU for computer science.
Iowa is a great value. I have a couple of different degrees from it which have served me very well in life. But yeah, it isn't the Harvard of anything. Not even the state of Iowa, relative to other schools in the state.FSU is ranked higher than Iowa.
When I got into Iowa my mom kept telling people "Iowa is the harvard of the west" and I had to finally say "mom, I don't think that's true."
Myth: Is Iowa the Harvard of the west?Iowa is a great value. I have a couple of different degrees from it which have served me very well in life. But yeah, it isn't the Harvard of anything. Not even the state of Iowa, relative to other schools in the state.
I really wasn't that upset about the call due to this reason. I would've rather taken the loss than having Kirk and Brian boast about the win that had nothing to do with our craptastic offense but was bailed out again by the incredible special teams playI like to think of it this way: calling the punt return back and having Brian's lame offense not bailed out again by random lightning strikes may have been what Beth needed to terminate Brian. So, it was a fair trade, in my book.
I have recently learned that Harvard College is referred Drake University of the east coast.Myth: Is Iowa the Harvard of the west?
Result: BUSTED!