Not very......just awful on the road.Ohio State (17-12) beat Nebraska (20-9) at home tonight, 78-69.
@Alum-Ni , how comfortable are you when they play on a neutral court? Hopefully for you they are better than how they do in true road games.
Not very......just awful on the road.Ohio State (17-12) beat Nebraska (20-9) at home tonight, 78-69.
@Alum-Ni , how comfortable are you when they play on a neutral court? Hopefully for you they are better than how they do in true road games.
2 | 2 | Purdue | Big Ten | 25-3 | 6-3 | 5-0 | 14-0 | 9-3 | 6-0 | 7-0 | 3-0 |
16 | 16 | Illinois | Big Ten | 21-7 | 4-5 | 2-0 | 15-2 | 4-5 | 5-2 | 7-0 | 5-0 |
22 | 22 | Wisconsin | Big Ten | 18-10 | 3-8 | 2-0 | 13-2 | 6-6 | 6-4 | 2-0 | 4-0 |
24 | 24 | Michigan St. | Big Ten | 17-11 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 13-4 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 5-0 | 4-0 |
43 | 41 | Nebraska | Big Ten | 20-9 | 2-8 | 1-0 | 17-1 | 4-7 | 3-2 | 6-0 | 7-0 |
48 | 48 | Northwestern | Big Ten | 20-8 | 4-6 | 2-1 | 14-1 | 5-5 | 5-2 | 4-0 | 6-1 |
60 | 61 | Iowa | Big Ten | 17-12 | 3-8 | 2-1 | 12-3 | 2-8 | 5-3 | 4-1 | 6-0 |
63 | 65 | Ohio St. | Big Ten | 17-12 | 1-8 | 4-0 | 12-4 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 7-1 | 5-0 |
70 | 69 | Maryland | Big Ten | 15-14 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 11-5 | 2-8 | 4-3 | 2-3 | 7-0 |
76 | 75 | Minnesota | Big Ten | 17-11 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 15-3 | 1-7 | 6-3 | 1-1 | 9-0 |
90 | 98 | Rutgers | Big Ten | 15-13 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 12-4 | 3-9 | 3-3 | 2-1 | 7-0 |
95 | 94 | Penn St. | Big Ten | 14-15 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 12-4 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
105 | 105 | Indiana | Big Ten | 15-13 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 12-5 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 3-1 | 6-0 |
129 | 118 | Michigan | Big Ten | 8-21 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 5-9 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 1-1 |
Man - outside of Purdue and Illinois is any team in the B10 going to win a game in the tournament? This is an ugly year.
The road record for all Big Ten teams thus far in conference games. Only Purdue has a winning road record in the league.
Purdue (6-3)
Illinois (4-5)
Northwestern (4-6)
Michigan State (3-5)
Maryland (4-7)
Rutgers (3-7)
Iowa (3-8)
Wisconsin (3-8)
Indiana (2-6)
Minnesota (2-7)
Penn State (2-7)
Nebraska (2-8)
Michigan (1-8)
Ohio State (1-8)
The road record for all Big Ten teams thus far in conference games. Only Purdue has a winning road record in the league.
Purdue (6-3)
Illinois (4-5)
Northwestern (4-6)
Michigan State (3-5)
Maryland (4-7)
Rutgers (3-7)
Iowa (3-8)
Wisconsin (3-8)
Indiana (2-6)
Minnesota (2-7)
Penn State (2-7)
Nebraska (2-8)
Michigan (1-8)
Ohio State (1-8)
I agree that this is the path but am not confident that they can win 3 in a row(4 including PSU), they're just not consistent. Fran needs to treat each game as a one and done and forego the first half stupid 2 foul rule. Play your best guys as long as you can until you have to make a change, that should be the approach.I still think the Hawks need to win their last 2 and at least 1 in the BTT to be virtually assured of a bid. And I believe they can do it!
Michigan has 1 road win! I would love to have a redo on that game. You take that loss away and add to win column we are probably 1 win away! Should have could have,sad when you think about it!The road record for all Big Ten teams thus far in conference games. Only Purdue has a winning road record in the league.
Purdue (6-3)
Illinois (4-5)
Northwestern (4-6)
Michigan State (3-5)
Maryland (4-7)
Rutgers (3-7)
Iowa (3-8)
Wisconsin (3-8)
Indiana (2-6)
Minnesota (2-7)
Penn State (2-7)
Nebraska (2-8)
Michigan (1-8)
Ohio State (1-8)
Almost every coach has a 2 fouls in 1st half, you sit rule. Would you rather Freeman pick up a cheap 3rd & have to play very tentative in the 2nd half? I would only throw the rule in the wind if we were getting blown out and need to exhaust all options. I'd rather see Brauns in there mixing it up than risk Owen picking up the cheap third foul. Other team would be going at him hard.... use the bench & others step it up in his absence.I agree that this is the path but am not confident that they can win 3 in a row(4 including PSU), they're just not consistent. Fran needs to treat each game as a one and done and forego the first half stupid 2 foul rule. Play your best guys as long as you can until you have to make a change, that should be the approach.
Win next 2 and plus 1 in the BTT and we should be feeling very good on selection Sunday. One at a time, tomorrow's game is HUGE!Full text of the tweet:
Some Torvik at large probabilities for Iowa:
Current: 16%
Win tomorrow: 49%
Lose tomorrow: 7%
Win next 2: 64%
Win then lose: 31%
Lose then win: 33%
Lose next 2: 2%
(Math isn't fully making sense on some of these given win probabilities, but there are other factors....)
Last 4 in - Gonzaga, Colorado, St Johns, Villanova | |
First 4 out - New Mexico, Utah, Ole Miss, Iowa | |
Next 4 out - Butler, Oregon, Pittsburgh, Syracuse |
Or he can pick up a cheap 3rd in the first min of the 2nd half. I think if it is one and done game you look to maximize minutes for your best players, won't happen if they sit for 10 in the 1st half... IMO just play aggressive until you can't is how those games should be approached.Almost every coach has a 2 fouls in 1st half, you sit rule. Would you rather Freeman pick up a cheap 3rd & have to play very tentative in the 2nd half? I would only throw the rule in the wind if we were getting blown out and need to exhaust all options. I'd rather see Brauns in there mixing it up than risk Owen picking up the cheap third foul. Other team would be going at him hard.... use the bench & others step it up in his absence.
Nah, I'd maybe only play him in contolled situations. Close to TV timeout & Iowa with the ball. Limit the defensive foul exposure. With shot clock, you always have a chance at come backs in 2nd half. Remember the Minny comeback?Or he can pick up a cheap 3rd in the first min of the 2nd half. I think if it is one and done game you look to maximize minutes for your best players, won't happen if they sit for 10 in the 1st half... IMO just play aggressive until you can't is how those games should be approached.
I would not want to draw Ohio State in the BTT. I would love to get Nebraska.Not very......just awful on the road.