In a distant future where the debate of LGBTQ+ rights are no longer a divisive topic, then sure your point would be valid. However, that isn't the case here.
Furthermore, I've seen reports be very discriptive:
"The shooting took place at this widely known biker bar, here in South Side San Antonio"
or
"The incident happened at a restaurant known for it's strong ties to the African American community"
And how does this distant future get closer? One way is to stop citing the LGBTQ community as somehow not mainstream, not normal, something to be pointed out. Now, Pride parades and such are fine and to be supported (these being initiated by the LGBTQ community). But the media can help by NOT continuing to report on LGBTQ status when it is not KNOWN to be relevant.
The two cases you cite may or may not be defendable (don't want to engage here), but certainly there can be other cases of reporters reporting irrelevant facts. No one has a monopoly on bad reporting.