Awesome. That’s fine. State/local issue anyway.CRT is NOT an issue i will be considering when i step in the voting booth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Awesome. That’s fine. State/local issue anyway.CRT is NOT an issue i will be considering when i step in the voting booth.
Dude, we’re talking about @gonegolfing . And is it “intelligent” to take the words of one person and immediately generalize them to an entire group of people? Like, as a matter of habit? I’m going to suggest no, it’s not intelligent. It’s the behavior of a simple-minded doofus.highly intelligent lib response.
It's because those countries typically have parliamentary style governments and have to form coalitions to form a government....pretty much ensures compromise. In our 2 party system...with no Filibuster....there will be zero incentive to compromise.This however only goes back to the ultimate problem of how insanely divided this country is politically.
There are a lot of countries where there is no super majority requirement in their legislatures and that they are able to create laws with relative ease. And yet they don't experience the problem of the parties going through and overturning everything the previous party did.
Something is broken in this country down to the core.
A traitor in the minds of an American hating liberal putz seems like a win. Your AD still having those special meetings with you?STFU traitor.
It's because those countries typically have parliamentary style governments and have to form coalitions to form a government....pretty much ensures compromise. In our 2 party system...with no Filibuster....there will be zero incentive to compromise.
They don't compromise much now but still do....covid relief/infrastructure bill ect....
Get rid of the filibuster it'll be even worse....
You sure burn up your internet credits early in the month. I'm not sure the institution realizes you might benefit by spreading your time over a broader spread. Be much better for your mental health.Dude, we’re talking about @gonegolfing . And is it “intelligent” to take the words of one person and immediately generalize them to an entire group of people? Like, as a matter of habit? I’m going to suggest no, it’s not intelligent. It’s the behavior of a simple-minded doofus.
You and goldmom love to suggest those in disagreement simply must be institutionalized. Interesting. Not fascist. Not at all.You sure burn up your internet credits early in the month. I'm not sure the institution realizes you might benefit by spreading your time over a broader spread. Be much better for your mental health.
And the constitution can't be changed?The electoral college is constitutional sooo...........
You have a point but wouldn't you agree that libs are much more prone to use profanity and name call in response to people they do not agree with? I think we need to talk to each other and be civil as possible. Who knows , maybe common ground can be found. We have had 3 presidents in row that suck at uniting us. Maybe if ordinary citizens treated each other with respect and talked better, the next president could take a hint. The extremes of both parties have had too much say.Dude, we’re talking about @gonegolfing . And is it “intelligent” to take the words of one person and immediately generalize them to an entire group of people? Like, as a matter of habit? I’m going to suggest no, it’s not intelligent. It’s the behavior of a simple-minded doofus.
Thanks! Sometimes it's better than trying to conversate with your ilk.highly intelligent lib response.
Again - Sharia law is more liberal on abortion than republicans.It's almost like Republicans are telling us what they are going to do.
We should believe them. They want to impose Sharia Law upon the rest of us.
The people? Sure...let's let the PEOPLE decide. Not the gerrymandered representatives. Let's have a straight national vote on the issue.It's about letting the people decide. I thought you believed in democracy? Judges should not decide pubic policy they are just supposed to decide Constitutionality.
Dude, this is HROT. I think of it as a barber shop or bar where anything goes and we all name-call and bullshit nearly always with no real offense intended. It’s hilarious how the perception is skewed by tribe, too. The name-calling is universal. Hell, your boy just called me mentally ill. I take no real offense. I don’t complain about the name-calling. I don’t try to suggest righties do it more. I just play along. Because we’re all just idiots talking shit in a forum full of idiots.You have a point but wouldn't you agree that libs are much more prone to use profanity and name call in response to people they do not agree with? I think we need to talk to each other and be civil as possible. Who knows , maybe common ground can be found. We have had 3 presidents in row that suck at uniting us. Maybe if ordinary citizens treated each other with respect and talked better, the next president could take a hint. The extremes of both parties have had too much say.
What we need is to go back to the talking filibuster. Make them put in some work to deny discussion or a vote being brought up. How it is now is a huge problem in my bookMaybe but the UK has pretty much a 2 party system. I mean they have representatives for several minor parties in parliament however coalition governments are uncommon while majority governments where one party has a full on majority are the rule rather than the exception.
lolDude, this is HROT. I think of it as a barber shop or bar where anything goes and we all name-call and bullshit nearly always with no real offense intended. It’s hilarious how the perception is skewed by tribe, too. The name-calling is universal. Hell, your boy just called me mentally ill. I take no real offense. I don’t complain about the name-calling. I don’t try to suggest righties do it more. I just play along. Because we’re all just idiots talking shit in a forum full of idiots.
And this is all quite funny because while you didn’t “name-call” in the technical sense, you just broad-brushed, implicitly, and entire group of people as at-best “lower-form”.
You have no complaint, and surely no objective observation. At some point acknowledge your own bias.
Exactly. You complained about language and name-calling in the midst of your own name-calling and demeaning. Hilarious.
Post less. You're never right about anything.A traitor in the minds of an American hating liberal putz seems like a win. Your AD still having those special meetings with you?
I’m a little more pragmatic here. I think this is McConnell sending a warning shot about the filibuster rule. Both sides need to be careful here because getting rid of the filibuster for one thing is going to lead to policy that the other side abhors when the power shifts.