Moss heading to visit Kansas
Sit him on the bench?Bill Self would use moss wisely
Ya ok dudeThe role of being the second best three point shooter on the highest scoring and third best 3pt shooting team in the Big Ten
Edit: thanks for proving my point with the word “downplay” though
Right f me for choosing to recognize how Moss helped Iowa during his time here and pointing out how that would make him attractive to several big name schools. I’ll quiet up and let the rational people keep comparing him to Dailey and EllingsonYa ok dude
I see two possible explanations for the transfer (could be more, I could be totally wrong)The Mosses saying all the right things to keep the situation positive. Smart move to facilitate his move.
Clearly coaches around the country value Ikes game more than some Iowa fans.
I give these detractors the benefit of the doubt assuming that they are not down on Ike the person and wish him well...otherwise the sentiments of appreciation by Moss to Hawk fans would be undeserved.
I continue to be puzzled by this transfer. Not sure how Ike would perceive a better opportunity to prepare for the pros at unknown situations like his final four schools unless Fran simply refused to concede to the possibility of more minutes,even if Ikes play improved.Hmmmm...
I’ve got no problem acknowledging that Moss is an average Big Ten starter, who is pretty one dimensional offensively. Given Fran’s teams’ success on offense, I tend to agree his contributions can (and likely will) be replaced.I have no idea why we’ve chosen to have some stupid dichotomy around Moss’ contributions. It’s possible that he is a good player AND that we could replace his production rather easily.
If Ike was such a bum why are these schools even interested?
If Ike is so horrible why did he start for three seasons at Iowa?
Making 43 per cent from the arc must be easy if a bum like Ike can do it.
I’ve got no problem acknowledging that Moss is an average Big Ten starter, who is pretty one dimensional offensively. Given Fran’s teams’ success on offense, I tend to agree his contributions can (and likely will) be replaced.
What I don’t get is that when it’s Ellingson and Dailey grad transferring to seek more opportunity, it’s nothing but sunshine, “thank you for your contributions,” and “best of luck.” People discuss their contributions and what they could provide to their next teams. With Moss, the sentiment is bordering on the exact opposite, even though he’s apparently a borderline Big Ten player according to some here. Pretty disappointing considering Isaiah has done nothing but keep his head down, say the right things, and give his best during his time at Iowa and throughout the transfer process.
But whatever. I have too many posts in this thread and have already expressed my sentiment.
Best of luck to Isaiah. Just like TC, I won’t hate on somebody who wants to try to live out their dream and believes somewhere else is the best avenue to do so after spending four years in Iowa’s program. I’ll continue to follow his career and hope he goes off wherever he ends up
I completely agree.I have no idea why we’ve chosen to have some stupid dichotomy around Moss’ contributions. It’s possible that he is a good player AND that we could replace his production rather easily.
He abandoned his teammates. I could care less where he goes
Why would Kansas even consider an experienced player who shot 42% from 3 and plays decent defense?
I hope Moss goes to KU and goes off to quiet some of you who continuously try to downplay his contributions to the Hawks the last couple of years. The mere fact that he’s drawn comparisons to Maishe Dailey, whose best transfer option was Akron, and Brady Ellingson, whose best transfer option was Drake, within this very thread might indicate that some of you need to take off the blinders. He wouldn’t be a go-to guy on KU, but would fill an important role, much as he did on Iowa.
So, is the "real" reason Moss is leaving because Fran and he did not get along?Hahaha....this board would have an epic meltdown if Moss were to start for Kansas.
I have no clue. It took Moss 4 years to realize he didn't like his coach?So, is the "real" reason Moss is leaving because Fran and he did not get along?
Or was it a combo of things, where he also so a reduced role?
Maybe 4 years to realize his coach may not be helping his needs to get the the NBA.I have no clue. It took Moss 4 years to realize he didn't like his coach?
That's exactly right Suterman. He could help the team but he is never going to be consistent and have his head in the game all the time. Too bad because he does have talent but just can't turn it up and keep it there.I have no clue. It took Moss 4 years to realize he didn't like his coach?
This. Lots of bitter idiots on this board.
I remember when people said losing Jok was a good thing. The same thing is happening with Cook and Moss now. Probably with a similar result.
I remember when people said losing Jok was a good thing. The same thing is happening with Cook and Moss now. Probably with a similar result.
or a coaching staff that failed him. The season ahead will tell...
Nobody is putting him on a pedestal. He was the 5th best Iowa starter last year. I am defending him from a lot of unnecessary vitriol either towards him or his game. At this point, everybody here knows his flaws, so continuing to dwell on them while ignoring the positives he brought to Iowa’s team is extra. JMOWhat I don’t understand is some of the fans defending him and putting him on a pedestal
The low eFG supports my one-dimensional player comment. The fact that Moss was absolutely miserable from inside the 3pt line dragged down his eFG substantially, which even places a higher emphasis on 3pt shooting I believe.Someone with a better knowledge of advanced analytics can show me other sources, but this site I found off reddit shows Moss to rank in the 51.8 percentile offensively. His effective FG percentage is in the 42.7 percentile.
http://www.barttorvik.com/team.php?team=Iowa
For a pretty one-dimensional player, those are not impressive numbers. He ranks even below Connor.
He was on a team like that, yet, he passed up open 3's and dribbled into trouble or took long 2's. Moss is decent as a catch and shoot player, but, he wants to be more and that brings down his production and eFG rating.The low eFG supports my one-dimensional player comment. The fact that Moss was absolutely miserable from inside the 3pt line dragged down his eFG substantially, which even places a higher emphasis on 3pt shooting I believe.
As @Stormn Norman pointed out earlier in the thread, IM needs to be in a position on a team where he doesn’t need to be a primary ballhandler or create his own shot, just needs to catch and shoot.
I remember when people said losing Jok was a good thing. The same thing is happening with Cook and Moss now. Probably with a similar result.
Read a lot of crazy things on here. But don't remember this one.