Can you link that article?Politicos original reporting said a 3rd person answered the door.
Can you link that article?Politicos original reporting said a 3rd person answered the door.
I have seen it reported that a 3rd party answered the door.No it did not. You’re inferring that’s what it said, it did not say that.
I imagine it's a pretty big house. It's possible the other person wasn't close to where Pelosi and the intruder were interacting. Heck I use to be able to sleep through the fire alarm in college.You are saying that a 3rd person in the house had Jon idea what was going on in the house before the doorbell rang?
It said an unknown person, did not say a 3rd person. It’s very possible they just don’t know if pelosi or the whack job opened the door.I have seen it reported that a 3rd party answered the door.
It also says that person wants to remain anonymous, yet was close enough to hear thr "where is nancy".It said an unknown person, did not say a 3rd person. It’s very possible they just don’t know if pelosi or the whack job opened the door.
I never saw a part that said that but I only saw the twitter snippets of the original article so easily could have missed it.It also says that person wants to remain anonymous, yet was close enough to hear thr "where is nancy".
Out if curiosity here, what is your guess on what happened?What a fascinating 19 pages. Oftentimes when people realize they have been tricked or are otherwise humiliated they will react with anger. Especially vulnerable to this anger are the stereotypical "meathead" types that are proud of their physical prowess.
Thankfully it appears that they are handling it well so far, especially the one who is especially susceptible to feelings of hatred and have a difficult time dealing with that feeling.
Keep that in mind before you punch down.
For your pleasureCan you link that article?
Not shocking that Republicans are still running ads in Iowa invoking Pelosi's name. Anyone with class would pull those ads. I guess that excludes the modern day Republican.
Seriously? You are going with that?It said an unknown person, did not say a 3rd person. It’s very possible they just don’t know if pelosi or the whack job opened the door.
Where does it say a 3rd person in your article? Where has anyone else mentioned a 3rd person? You’ve lost your marbles really. You’re in the Q hole.Seriously? You are going with that?
Out if curiosity here, what is your guess on what happened?
It says unknown person, not necessarily a 3rd person.For your pleasure
![]()
Police offer new details in Paul Pelosi assault
San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott confirmed that the intruder was specifically targeting the House speaker. "Everyone should be disgusted," he said.www.politico.com
This article says none of that.It also says that person wants to remain anonymous, yet was close enough to hear thr "where is nancy".
For your pleasure
![]()
Police offer new details in Paul Pelosi assault
San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott confirmed that the intruder was specifically targeting the House speaker. "Everyone should be disgusted," he said.www.politico.com
So they say an unknown person and then reference Pelosi and David in the same sentence.Where does it say a 3rd person in your article? Where has anyone else mentioned a 3rd person? You’ve lost your marbles really. You’re in the Q hole.
Not that it matters, but it's not in the same sentence.So they say an unknown person and then reference Pelosi and David in the same sentence.
Of god, you are A Q nowIt reads like a third person to me. If someone answered the door, and the people who were let in (the police) found DePape and Pelosi fighting, that reads like the person who answered the door is someone other than DePape and Pelosi, as opposed to just it being unknown which of those two answered the door.
I read it like the police told the reporter that it is unknown who opened the door. I could see it being pelosi running toward the door and opening it and the whack job got close so he tried to fight for the hammer. If it is a third person at all their testimony will come out some day, but if it is a third person I doubt they know much about what happened that night.It reads like a third person to me. If someone answered the door, and the people who were let in (the police) found DePape and Pelosi fighting, that reads like the person who answered the door is someone other than DePape and Pelosi, as opposed to just it being unknown which of those two answered the door.
No just you. Some people can make good discussions and not be obsessed loons like yourself.Of god, you are A Q now
I don't think it matters. The police were there, surely they would interview the third person. It almost reads like they didn't see the person. Maybe there is a remote way to open door. Hopefully they'll share the body cam footageOf god, you are A Q now
If it is a housekeeper then it doesn’t matter. If the person knows David then it adds a ton to the story.I don't think it matters. The police were there, surely they would interview the third person. It almost reads like they didn't see the person. Maybe there is a remote way to open door. Hopefully they'll share the body cam footage
I read it like the police told the reporter that it is unknown who opened the door. I could see it being pelosi running toward the door and opening it and the whack job got close so he tried to fight for the hammer. If it is a third person at all their testimony will come out some day, but if it is a third person I doubt they know much about what happened that night.
So, you have nothing but "Team Red!" Got it.He should be arrested for attentive murder. Not disputing that at all.
How bout them Fins? Nice to see you spent the entire game obsessing about Mr Pelosi. You need help manIf it is a housekeeper then it doesn’t matter. If the person knows David then it adds a ton to the story.
There wasn’t a 3rd person in the house per SFPD. You were wrong. Again. What’s your next conspiracy?You are saying that a 3rd person in the house had Jon idea what was going on in the house before the doorbell rang?
There wasn’t a 3rd person in the house per SFPD. You were wrong. Again. What’s your next conspiracy?
His son boyfriend, eh? Is that you?The attacker has been identified as chis' son boyfriend...
I'm sure @ihhawk will be back soon to admit his error and his failings.There wasn’t a 3rd person in the house per SFPD. You were wrong. Again. What’s your next conspiracy?
Great summary of how things work these days for 1/3rd of our country. I have no idea how to fix this but it spells our end if we can’t.
I’m just going by what Politico reported. I have seen anything that contradicts thatThere wasn’t a 3rd person in the house per SFPD. You were wrong. Again. What’s your next conspiracy?
I was sitting in the couch watching it. Tua will be a pro bowler this year.How bout them Fins? Nice to see you spent the entire game obsessing about Mr Pelosi. You need help man