We sure this isn't Ye or Kyrie in white face?
We sure this isn't Ye or Kyrie in white face?
I’ll reach out to Musk and complain@ihhawk you want to admit anything here? Maybe amplifying a conspiracy website that reported Hillary died 6 years ago was a mistake?
I haven’t seen all 3 in the same room at the same time.We sure this isn't Ye or Kyrie in white face?
We should start a blog. Cash in on this homey.I haven’t seen all 3 in the same room at the same time.
Well if it is true, mr. Pelosi may have thought he was hooking up with one dude and he was really dating both a basketball superstar and whatever the hell Kanye is.We should start a blog. Cash in on this homey.
Cool Elon share info that's been debunked. And you think that is evidence of something.
Classic, you claim to admit when you're wrong then when presented with the evidence immediately don't and deflect.I’ll reach out to Musk and complain
You shared it without checking the source of the article. What happened to your claim that you'll own up to it if you're wrong?I’ll reach out to Musk and complain
Looks like the source can be bogus. Lots of bogus crap out thereYou shared it without checking the source of the article. What happened to your claim that you'll own up to it if you're wrong?
And?Looks like the source can be bogus. Lots of bogus crap out there
Do you have any responsibility for sharing it based on the story confirming your beliefs?Soo?
Well that’s how this site works. Do I need to apologize? I’m trying to remember if that’s the requirement hereDo you have any responsibility for sharing it based on the story confirming your beliefs?
No apology necessary, I just thought you were a man of your word. I was wrong.Well that’s how this site works. Do I need to apologize? I’m trying to remember if that’s the requirement here
You’re the one who said you own it when you’re wrong.Well that’s how this site works. Do I need to apologize? I’m trying to remember if that’s the requirement here
I could be absolutely wrong in this whole thing. I admit that. Some of the early reporting has left open some questionable details.No apology necessary, I just thought you were a man of your word. I was wrong.
If I’m wrong I will admit it. It’s a random message board. No one cares.You’re the one who said you own it when you’re wrong.
![]()
Some of your biggest questions have been answered including the underwear rumor.I could be absolutely wrong in this whole thing. I admit that. Some of the early reporting has left open some questionable details.
Hopefully those get answered soon.
You’ve already let us know your obsession on this has bled into your home life so I can tell you do in fact care.If I’m wrong I will admit it. It’s a random message board. No one cares.
Did the 3rd person that Politico report on get answered?Some of your biggest questions have been answered including the underwear rumor.
That was last year. I don’t take any of this serious anymore. Not effecting anythingYou’ve already let us know your obsession on this has bled into your home life so I can tell you do in fact care.
And you promoted itLooks like the source can be bogus. Lots of bogus crap out there
And yet you won't admit to it and then keep saying it's a message board that doesn't matter.If I’m wrong I will admit it. It’s a random message board. No one cares.
I'm not aware of anything on that, but how would a 3rd person charge the current reporting? What's your new theory?Did the 3rd person that Politico report on get answered?
Any person in the Pelosi house that wasn't Nancy or Paul was obviously a gay lover. Those are the only people that get let into ih's house, so.I'm not aware of anything on that, but how would a 3rd person charge the current reporting? What's your new theory?
And because it's San Francisco, it has to have something to do with "the gays."Any person in the Pelosi house that wasn't Nancy or Paul was obviously a gay lover. Those are the only people that get let into ih's house, so.
A 3rd person raises a ton of questions.I'm not aware of anything on that, but how would a 3rd person charge the current reporting? What's your new theory?
What were they wearing and did it clash with the others?Like what?
You know the saying, "two's company, three's a (scandalous, probably illegal, and definitely gay) crowd."Like what?
The person was able to answer the door correct? So why can’t that person call 911 or go get help?Like what?
Maybe they didn't hear anything before the doorbell rang.The person was able to answer the door correct? So why can’t that person call 911 or go get help?
You don’t even know it’s a third person, but you sure want to expand on that.The person was able to answer the door correct? So why can’t that person call 911 or go get help?
Politicos original reporting said a 3rd person answered the door.You don’t even know it’s a third person, but you sure want to expand on that.
No it did not. You’re inferring that’s what it said, it did not say that.Politicos original reporting said a 3rd person answered the door.
You are saying that a 3rd person in the house had Jon idea what was going on in the house before the doorbell rang?Maybe they didn't hear anything before the doorbell rang.
Chris, he posted something to the extent of " might want to pump your breaks a little" relax.