I've never had that problem.
At least you can are able to admit it finally. Congrats to you.
I've never had that problem.
wut?At least you can are able to admit it finally. Congrats to you.
wut?
She spoke her true feelings then realized she couldn’t do that so she issues an apology. Like anyone believes her apology
It’s incredible what has happened to the Republican Party. Both the candidates and the bulk of it’s members. Cruelty, anti intellectual, authoritarian, conspiracy theory, hate, greed, and self absorbency all are the embraced traits of these “Christian” patriots.
Honestly, with cancel culture being what it is, there's no benefit to apologizing. The ones who have fought off the cancel culture best after any incident have just kept it moving.You don't know that, and even if true at least she apologized. When did it become a sign of weakness amongst Rs to say 'sorry, I was wrong'. The doubling down on lying, conspiracy theories & "alternative" facts blows my mind.
All I'm saying is there are too many holes in the MSM narrative. I'm not a Dem. I don't listen to the news and accept it as fact.Are you saying Paul Pelosi wasn't attacked?
Go get some therapy.All I'm saying is there are too many holes in the MSM narrative. I'm not a Dem. I don't listen to the news and accept it as fact.
The benefit is doing the right thing and having integrity but that's not been a priority for the right wing for some time now.Honestly, with cancel culture being what it is, there's no benefit to apologizing. The ones who have fought off the cancel culture best after any incident have just kept it moving.
That sounds awfully conspiratorial… if the MSM/LAM isn’t reporting it as fact then you’re simply substituting reality and truth for your own.. it least that’s what anyone who asks questions is being told. So welcome to the club.If I'm being held hostage by a nutcase with a hammer I would call him my girlfriend if I thought it would de-escalate the situation.....I guess that's something the resident geniuses wouldn't think of
There’s no reason to say you’re sorry if you haven’t done anything wrong. Saying something that is unpopular, or even offensive isn’t wrong if it’s “your truth.” Nobody asks the gender dysphoric to say they’re sorry for their mental illness.The benefit is doing the right thing and having integrity but that's not been a priority for the right wing for some time now.
That sounds awfully conspiratorial… if the MSM/LAM isn’t reporting it as fact then you’re simply substituting reality and truth for your own.. it least that’s what anyone who asks questions is being told. So welcome to the club.
I’d say because we’ve been conditioned to disbelieve the opening narratives to any story. Our first reaction to any news story now is to be skeptical. We’ve seen too many stories with too many retractions to not just believe we’re being lied to.Joe: Why Can't Most Republicans Say Pelosi Attack Is A Tragedy, Bad For America?
LOL - you and other MAGAs bought the initial false narrative about this break in hook line and sinker from the start.I’d say because we’ve been conditioned to disbelieve the opening narratives to any story. Our first reaction to any news story now is to be skeptical. We’ve seen too many stories with too many retractions to not just believe we’re being lied to.
I didn’t buy into anything. I’ve been asking since the story broke for some camera footage. If there’s something to this, show us. You can’t rob a 7/11 without camera footage but you can break into the third in line for the president without any?LOL - you and other MAGAs bought the initial false narrative about this break in hook line and sinker from the start.
Hey don’t be homophobic…
I think you're absolutely correct, but probably in a different way than you meant.I’d say because we’ve been conditioned to disbelieve the opening narratives to any story. Our first reaction to any news story now is to be skeptical. We’ve seen too many stories with too many retractions to not just believe we’re being lied to.
Why in the world would you think you would ever be entitled to that information if it existed?I didn’t buy into anything. I’ve been asking since the story broke for some camera footage. If there’s something to this, show us. You can’t rob a 7/11 without camera footage but you can break into the third in line for the president without any?
If you think it's skewed to one side you are ignoring a lot of news.Society and civilized behavior is a very thin thin veneer on top of self centered barbarism. These people have been here forever, they just felt the need to hold back because they were worried about the repercussions. Now they feel empowered to behavior less civilized because of a dawning realization "oh, you are one too!". This became very apparent under Trump, but it's been here for a while. I saw it when the internet was picking up and becoming more mainstream while conducting online sexual predator investigations. I'm not sure how we can put the toothpaste back in the tube.
Now Im not saying it is exclusively current day Republicans, but it sure seems to be skewed to one side.
So you think the cameras may have been working but the incident is not being released? Interesting if so. I’d also be interested as to why they’d hold back on releasing it because it would make these conspiracy fools look stupid, which in actuality shouldn’t be very difficult.Why in the world would you think you would ever be entitled to that information if it existed?
The benefit is doing the right thing and having integrity but that's not been a priority for the right wing for some time now.
Minor point. Pelosi is 2nd in line.I didn’t buy into anything. I’ve been asking since the story broke for some camera footage. If there’s something to this, show us. You can’t rob a 7/11 without camera footage but you can break into the third in line for the president without any?
So you think the cameras may have been working but the incident is not being released? Interesting if so. I’d also be interested as to why they’d hold back on releasing it because it would make these conspiracy fools look stupid, which in actuality shouldn’t be very difficult.
I think they said no one was monitoring them, which is different than saying they weren’t on.
They want us to know that Mr Pelosi definitely did not have gay sex with the naked dudes swinging hammers, and that it was just one dude and he was not naked.Any chance anyone wants to give me the cliffsnotes
If you watched the segment, it said that the Capitol police noticed the local police lights at the Pelosi residence. They then backed up the video and saw the break in. That means they have video of the break in.I think they said no one was monitoring them, which is different than saying they weren’t on.
Why do they show it on the 6:00 news?Why in the world would you think you would ever be entitled to that information if it existed?
Why do they show it on the 6:00 news?
Which is exactly why some of us are skeptical of any story as it’s first reported. Be first not right. New motto of the 24 hour news cycle.Gotta get the scoop baby! Rush to be first has, for many, taken over the standard of being accurate. And even when they say "we haven't independently verified...." they still know they have to be first with something.
Why do they show it on the 6:00 news?
So you think the cameras may have been working but the incident is not being released? Interesting if so. I’d also be interested as to why they’d hold back on releasing it because it would make these conspiracy fools look stupid, which in actuality shouldn’t be very difficult.
So there's never been security footage released to the media before? Ever? GTGOH I had pet rocks with a higher IQ than some of y'all.So DAs should release evidence because loons are demanding it? That's not how this works.
That is sort of interesting because it sounds like they stood there until this guy actually hit Mr. Pelosi. Not that they should have pumped him full of lead, but they could have rushed him and the poor man might have escaped serious injury.So Pelosi is the one that was able to answer the door and great the police per the police report. It appears he was also fighting over the hammer with David. I’m surprised the police didn’t light David up.
So DAs should release evidence because loons are demanding it? That's not how this works.