Did you ever think he might be better than you give him credit for? Oh I forgot, you’re the NBA expert and screw the fact that actual NBA people are praising him. Sometimes you bet on yourself to keep improving. Most would think being a mid round 1st rounder rather than an early 2nd rounder is better.Absolutely.
Odds of hurting stock are higher than helping it.
You are correct!Not interesting, depressing. Good luck Joe, you are about to prove all the NBA talent evaluators around here wrong
The vertical is measured from a rocker type step, not standing or running. It also does not include wingspan. Otherwise it would say, combination vertical and wingspan. Much to the contrary of the "experts" posting here. Good luck to Joe - I hope a 1st round slot is in his future.Maybe its standard in the NBA combine (i have no idea), but normally when referring to vertical, most are referencing a standing number. The 42" was a 'max vertical' i.e. a running start.
Just in case we're comparing apples to oranges.
The vertical is measured from a rocker type step, not standing or running. It also does not include wingspan. Otherwise it would say, combination vertical and wingspan. Much to the contrary of the "experts" posting here. Good luck to Joe - I hope a 1st round slot is in his future.
ExactlyI like how when people have a less-than-optimistic opinion of the Hawkeyes, they sarcastically get called ”experts” and “talent evaluators” like we aren’t all cheering for the players to have success at Iowa and beyond. Newsflash: this place is for sharing opinions, and everybody is allowed to have one even if it doesn’t align with yours.
Joe was borderline going undrafted until his performance at the combine, so all of you acting like you knew that he would raise his stock to be talked about as a borderline first round pick are talking out of your asses
The irony of course is that this combine performance is what convinced Joe to stay in so his thought process is exactly in line with what I said.Did you ever think he might be better than you give him credit for? Oh I forgot, you’re the NBA expert and screw the fact that actual NBA people are praising him. Sometimes you bet on yourself to keep improving. Most would think being a mid round 1st rounder rather than an early 2nd rounder is better.
Actually, the reason many of those who are sarcastically labeled as "experts" is because they often do not understand the game (the big picture of it all) and double down on personal bias/opinion. See all the complaining about Fran when 99% have no clue what has to go into any particular decision that is made. And while I do not believe this is any way near the majority, there are people on here that are less than thrilled about JW because they spent three years complaining he wasn't all that he was supposed to be coming out of high school. He's not good enough so why is he wasting his time getting evaluated? I'm glad he's doing well and I hope it's been enough to get him into the 1st round or at least the top of the 2nd.I like how when people have a less-than-optimistic opinion of the Hawkeyes, they sarcastically get called ”experts” and “talent evaluators” like we aren’t all cheering for the players to have success at Iowa and beyond. Newsflash: this place is for sharing opinions, and everybody is allowed to have one even if it doesn’t align with yours.
Joe was borderline going undrafted until his performance at the combine, so all of you acting like you knew that he would raise his stock to be talked about as a borderline first round pick are talking out of your asses
He's not going to be drafted simply because he did well in this 2 week period. The NBA isn't that short sighted. It will always be a combination of skill set, production against similar prospects, and projection. And as I have previously said, I don't think it's the worst plan to come back and build upon what you have started. You don't think he can continue to improve and think it's a flash in the pan type situation, I think he could and move up higher in the draft. Difference of opinion and if I wanted an expert opinion, I'll look elsewhere.The irony of course is that this combine performance is what convinced Joe to stay in so his thought process is exactly in line with what I said.
He accomplished exactly what he wanted to get out of this combine.
You dont hit a home run and then ask for a do over.
Maybe it doesn't take an expert to figure out the obvious?
It’s pretty funny that you’re sarcastically calling people experts because they “don’t understand the game.” That must make you the “expert” then, huh?Actually, the reason many of those who are sarcastically labeled as "experts" is because they often do not understand the game (the big picture of it all) and double down on personal bias/opinion. See all the complaining about Fran when 99% have no clue what has to go into any particular decision that is made. And while I do not believe this is any way near the majority, there are people on here that are less than thrilled about JW because they spent three years complaining he wasn't all that he was supposed to be coming out of high school. He's not good enough so why is he wasting his time getting evaluated? I'm glad he's doing well and I hope it's been enough to get him into the 1st round or at least the top of the 2nd.
I think he took the opinions of these experts and stayed in the draft. I am Glad he didn’t listen to some turds like youHe's not going to be drafted simply because he did well in this 2 week period. The NBA isn't that short sighted. It will always be a combination of skill set, production against similar prospects, and projection. And as I have previously said, I don't think it's the worst plan to come back and build upon what you have started. You don't think he can continue to improve and think it's a flash in the pan type situation, I think he could and move up higher in the draft. Difference of opinion and if I wanted an expert opinion, I'll look elsewhere.
What’s taking so long to Joe Wieskamp to announce he is going pro thanks
I like how when people have a less-than-optimistic opinion of the Hawkeyes, they sarcastically get called ”experts” and “talent evaluators” like we aren’t all cheering for the players to have success at Iowa and beyond. Newsflash: this place is for sharing opinions, and everybody is allowed to have one even if it doesn’t align with yours.
Joe was borderline going undrafted until his performance at the combine, so all of you acting like you knew that he would raise his stock to be talked about as a borderline first round pick are talking out of your asses
Actually, the reason many of those who are sarcastically labeled as "experts" is because they often do not understand the game (the big picture of it all) and double down on personal bias/opinion. See all the complaining about Fran when 99% have no clue what has to go into any particular decision that is made. And while I do not believe this is any way near the majority, there are people on here that are less than thrilled about JW because they spent three years complaining he wasn't all that he was supposed to be coming out of high school. He's not good enough so why is he wasting his time getting evaluated? I'm glad he's doing well and I hope it's been enough to get him into the 1st round or at least the top of the 2nd.
Good luck, Weezy! You deserve the opportunity.
You can feel that the decision to go pro is dumb because your opinion is that a player isn’t ready while simultaneously hoping they do well in the NBA. I suspect that most people who posted negatively surrounding Tyler’s departure were just bitter that he was opting to leave Iowa early instead of coming back for his fourth year. There were similar comments from people who really didn’t want to see Joe go, and there will probably be similar comments when Keegan declares after next yearI disagree with you when it comes to Tyler Cook because many on here were not cheering his decision to leave early. There were a lot of people who thought he was dumb leaving early & thought there was no way he would play a game in the NBA. The comments were very negative and were more on how how dumb the decision was as opposed to wishing him success. I simply chuckle now because boy were these doubters wrong.
There also are many on here who make comments here and on the football board that they "watched the player's tape," where they act like experts when it comes to talent evaluation. Again, I just chuckle because the film they have watched only shows the good and not the bad.
You are correct in one aspect. Everyone is allowed an opinion, even when those with an an opinion have no idea what they are talking about or are simply just talking out of their ass.
No recent mock drafts have Wieskamp anywhere near the 1st round. Not Garza either
Showing well at the combine is very likely the difference between getting drafted or not for second round guys.He's not going to be drafted simply because he did well in this 2 week period. The NBA isn't that short sighted. It will always be a combination of skill set, production against similar prospects, and projection. And as I have previously said, I don't think it's the worst plan to come back and build upon what you have started. You don't think he can continue to improve and think it's a flash in the pan type situation, I think he could and move up higher in the draft. Difference of opinion and if I wanted an expert opinion, I'll look elsewhere.
Good thing he did well at the combine. Lucky, right?Showing well at the combine is very likely the difference between getting drafted or not for second round guys.
Hence the reason Joe is now projected to be drafted and was not prior.
Its not about being short sighted. Its about differentiating between a multitude of options.
I don't think you take the risk of coming back to an unknown situation. Sure it could pay off. But ...bird in the hand. Obviously Joe agrees.
When you make statements about what my opinion is when I have not said anything to that effect...thats called a straw man. That's the how an idiot argues so my suggestion would be to stop that.
I don't give a fvck what you want or who you want to call an expert or not. Thats irrelevant to me.