ADVERTISEMENT

Neither #12 ranked Arizona St nor #9 ranked Boise St should have received a 1st Round CFP Bye. Should 3 Loss, #11 ranked Alabama have gotten in?

Maybe you're trolling by not trolling?

There are many who have the opinion that the 12th ranked team and the 9th ranked team don't deserve a 1st round bye. None of those people are trolls. ;)

Sure, Arizona State gave a helluva effort today in losing to Texas. But that 1st round bye was huge for them, too. Texas prevailed, nevertheless.
 
There are many who have the opinion that the 12th ranked team and the 9th ranked team don't deserve a 1st round bye.
Of course, part of the problem there is that those rankings are entirely subjective by the people who vote on them. No set criteria they have to consider.

If they tweak anything next year - imo they ought to establish (publicly) what their criteria is for voting teams.
 
Honestly, I thought PSU/Boise was competitive - PSU clearly better, but Boise made them work for it.

As opposed to SMU who clearly weren't ready for the moment.
I think Texas loses in the next round. They've had a real easy schedule. The wins in conference are against the 9,10,11,12,13,15, and 16th place finishers in the sec. Two losses to Georgia. They took advantage of a schedule similar to the one Iowa had.
 
I think Texas loses in the next round. They've had a real easy schedule. The wins in conference are against the 9,10,11,12,13,15, and 16th place finishers in the sec. Two losses to Georgia. They took advantage of a schedule similar to the one Iowa had.
When Texas gets into an offensive rhythm I think they're an excellent team. They've shown however that if they get punched in the face they have a difficult time time getting back to that.

I agree that they will have a difficult time in the semis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
Of course, part of the problem there is that those rankings are entirely subjective by the people who vote on them. No set criteria they have to consider.

If they tweak anything next year - imo they ought to establish (publicly) what their criteria is for voting teams.

You should be on the committee ;)

It does seem like the committee moves the goal post from week to week when explaining why they ranked the teams the way they do.

Remember the old BSC computer that decided the top 2 teams? Why not use that instead of humans?

Just a thought....
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
It is nice that we finally had a competitive CFP game. ;)

How good go you think Texas is? Sure, they made the final 4, but Ohio State or Oregon is next.
I think Texas is extremely talented. And did I hear the next game is in Jerry World? That’s certainly an advantage. But I also think Ohio State’s best game trumps Texas’s best game. But only if Day continues to let it all hang out. If he gets conservative Texas can certainly win.
 
I think Texas is extremely talented. And did I hear the next game is in Jerry World? That’s certainly an advantage. But I also think Ohio State’s best game trumps Texas’s best game. But only if Day continues to let it all hang out. If he gets conservative Texas can certainly win.


Yep. The Longhorns get a chance to play a de facto home game with the Cotton Bowl semifinal in Arlington, Texas on Jan. 10.
 
IMO, this is what they should do:

* Rank the top 25 teams (maybe use the old BCS computer, to eliminate bias)

* Give the top 4 ranked teams first round byes (this year, the teams with byes would have been #1 Oregon, #2 Georgia, #3 Texas, #4 Penn State).

But that's just me.

What they did this year, instead:


Final College Football Playoff Rankings

RankTeamSeedCONFRECTREND
1OregonOregon *1Big Ten13-0-
2GeorgiaGeorgia *2SEC11-23
3TexasTexas5SEC11-21
4Penn StatePenn State6Big Ten11-21
5Notre DameNotre Dame7FBS Indep.11-11
6Ohio StateOhio State8Big Ten10-2-
7TennesseeTennessee9SEC10-2-
8IndianaIndiana10Big Ten11-11
9Boise StateBoise State *3Mountain West12-11
10SMUSMU11ACC11-22
11AlabamaAlabamaSEC9-3-
12Arizona StateArizona State *4Big 1211-23
13MiamiMiamiACC10-21
14Ole MissOle MissSEC9-31
15South CarolinaSouth CarolinaSEC9-31
16ClemsonClemson12ACC10-31
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
IMO, this is what they should do:

* Rank the top 25 teams (maybe use the old BCS computer, to eliminate bias)

* Give the top 4 ranked teams first round byes (this year, the teams with byes would have been #1 Oregon, #2 Georgia, #3 Texas, #4 Penn State).

But that's just me.

What they did this year, instead:


Final College Football Playoff Rankings

RankTeamSeedCONFRECTREND
1OregonOregon *1Big Ten13-0-
2GeorgiaGeorgia *2SEC11-23
3TexasTexas5SEC11-21
4Penn StatePenn State6Big Ten11-21
5Notre DameNotre Dame7FBS Indep.11-11
6Ohio StateOhio State8Big Ten10-2-
7TennesseeTennessee9SEC10-2-
8IndianaIndiana10Big Ten11-11
9Boise StateBoise State *3Mountain West12-11
10SMUSMU11ACC11-22
11AlabamaAlabamaSEC9-3-
12Arizona StateArizona State *4Big 1211-23
13MiamiMiamiACC10-21
14Ole MissOle MissSEC9-31
15South CarolinaSouth CarolinaSEC9-31
16ClemsonClemson12ACC10-31
Problem with this is I don’t like not having stakes in the conference title game; they’d be meaningless in this scenario.
 
Problem with this is I don’t like not having stakes in the conference title game; they’d be meaningless in this scenario.

I think winning the conference title alone is meaningful enough for EVERY team.

Even national title contenders have "conf champ" on their list of goals every year.

Heck, we keep calling the bowl games meaningless, but a lot of teams/fans are wound up about them and using it as THE measuring stick across teams/conferences. (See Michigan and Alabama)
 
I think winning the conference title alone is meaningful enough for EVERY team.

Even national title contenders have "conf champ" on their list of goals every year.

Heck, we keep calling the bowl games meaningless, but a lot of teams/fans are wound up about them and using it as THE measuring stick across teams/conferences. (See Michigan and Alabama)
Agreed.

I’m. To sure there’s a good fix here. Case in point would be Ohio state this year. Should Penn state have gotten a first round bye over Ohio state despite losing to them in the regular season?

At the end of the day, I think they got the correct 12 teams in this year, the quibbling to me is more about the seeding.
 
Agreed.

I’m. To sure there’s a good fix here. Case in point would be Ohio state this year. Should Penn state have gotten a first round bye over Ohio state despite losing to them in the regular season?

At the end of the day, I think they got the correct 12 teams in this year, the quibbling to me is more about the seeding.


#5 ranked ND & #6 ranked OSU fans are sure thankful for the expanded playoff. ;)

The Final 4 is set.

2 B1G teams
1 SEC team
1 Independent

Are we looking at an all B1G National Championship game?

The CFP semifinal matchups:

#4 ranked Penn St (6 seed) vs #5 ranked Notre Dame (7 seed)
Orange Bowl
Hard Rock Stadium, Miami Gardens, Florida
Jan 9; 6:30 pm CT kick off

#3 ranked Texas (5 seed) vs #6 ranked Ohio State (8 seed)

Cotton Bowl
AT&T Stadium, Arlington, Texas
Jan 10; 6:30 pm CT kick off
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
Loser Kiffin can run this score up and win by 100. You didn't make the playoff Lane because you didn't earn it.
You would have gotten trucked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman
wouldn't that piss off the SEC fanboys to no end? :)

Jerry Seinfeld Popcorn GIF by Sheets & Giggles



;)
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT