And, they never need a shred of actual proof. In many instances the absence of proof is all the proof they need validate their conspiracies. You just can't win an argument with these folks. They are the same ones who decry the ineptitude of the federal government, but when it suits them will tell you with a straight face that scores of feds came together to plan, coordinate, carry out, then cover up a complex event.
Plus, crap like this recycles because it sells on the conspiracy circuit. There have been times when I've thought I could make a good living writing conspiracy books.
Did you really need proof when there is an admission to events in the past? Operation Northwoods was classified for almost 30 years. Anyway, here are things you will never hear on NPR:
Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False Flag Terror
Posted on
March 18, 2015 by
WashingtonsBlog
Not Theory … Admitted Fact
There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.
In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack)
admit to it, either orally or in writing:
(8) The CIA
admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
(10) The British Prime Minister
admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials
discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.
(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to
blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to
commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following
ABC news report;
the official documents; and watch
this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper
promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.
(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even
suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”
(17) The NSA
admits that it
lied about what really happened in the
Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.
(18) A U.S. Congressional committee
admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.
(20) The German government
admitted (and
see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.
(24) The United States Army’s 1994 publication
Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 –
recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “
Dirty Wars“. And
see this.
(32) The U.S.
falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a
memo from the defense secretary – as one of the
main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission
admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney
said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now
admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now
say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was
not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have
alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it
knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).
(33) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually
told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters
looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House
tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
(35) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo
suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
Click link for balance.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/03/false-flag-5.html
