ADVERTISEMENT

Newsome caught in another lie...

sounds like the reservoir "cover" was under some type of repair thus it was unavailable to help with the water supply. While it's awful timing and a coincidence it was empty at the time of the fire, it does shoot down your whole, "nothing would have helped" official story when in fact this would have helped greatly.
It's a major reason why the water supply to put out early fires was quickly depleted.
Wait, wait, wait. So they had to shut it down for maintenance and you are blaming Democrats or Newsom for that? I mean, I don't know what more you want but the complaining is absolutely ridiculous. Hey, your name isn't Karen by chance, is it?
 
Wait, wait, wait. So they had to shut it down for maintenance and you are blaming Democrats or Newsom for that? I mean, I don't know what more you want but the complaining is absolutely ridiculous. Hey, your name isn't Karen by chance, is it?
If that's what you're getting out of my post then it's pretty pointless to carry on the convo.
The point I clearly made is if the reservoir was functional, there would have been 100+ million gallons of water to help fight fires, which contradicts the excuses you keep making.
I acknowledged it was likely just bad luck and a coincidence the reservoir was down currently. We'll see in the coming days how accurate that is.
 
Calm down, your forehead vein is starting to bulge.

They weren't prepared for one of the biggest natural threats in your state every year. Instead they put resources into DEI and smelt preservation when it could've gone to wild fire solutions.

Go take care of it

U r dumb
 
The reason the fire was big is Newsome dropped the ball. If the reservoirs were full, they should have had sufficient pumps to fight the fires. Forest fires occur every year in California.

Newsome was spending too much on illegals, and not enough to protect the residents of the state.

Meanwhile, many of these people whose house burned didn't have homeowner's insurance policies, because Newsome drove the insurance companies out of the state. Newsome is almost as bad as Biden and Harris.
Wrong. All of you maga dipshits are wrong.
 
Because the city doesn't have an unlimited budget. No city plans for an event like this. They plan for putting out a random house fire, not putting out all the houses that are on fire at once. To build a system that could do that would compete with the federal military budget and just isn't a realistic option at all. To continue to set this ridiculously high expectation and then to stick with it once it has been explained multiple times why that is not possible stinks of just an attempt to turn this into a political hatchet job. I mean, no one asks why Midwestern families aren't expected to build homes that can withstand an F4 tornado, but that is the expectation you are setting here.
‘They plan for putting out a random house fire, not putting out all the houses that are on fire at once.’

You make it sound like spontaneous combustion. That all of these houses started on fire at the same time. Maybe if there was enough water early that ‘all these houses’ wouldn’t have been on fire at the same time.
 
‘They plan for putting out a random house fire, not putting out all the houses that are on fire at once.’

You make it sound like spontaneous combustion. That all of these houses started on fire at the same time. Maybe if there was enough water early that ‘all these houses’ wouldn’t have been on fire at the same time.
That's ok, you can just say you have no idea how fires work in dry, highly combustible environments with hurricane force winds blowing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
‘They plan for putting out a random house fire, not putting out all the houses that are on fire at once.’

You make it sound like spontaneous combustion. That all of these houses started on fire at the same time. Maybe if there was enough water early that ‘all these houses’ wouldn’t have been on fire at the same time.
No these houses didn't catch fire all at once...but they DID spread very rapidly, faster than the firefighters could get to them.
 
No these houses didn't catch fire all at once...but they DID spread very rapidly, faster than the firefighters could get to them.
They did, and could they have been contained better? Definitely. Would more water have helped? Probably, would the water pressure been better if they had been contained better? Fairly certain yes on that. It has been somewhat of a perfect storm with the winds and lack of prevention that occurred. Bio thinks that all of it was unavoidable, that anyone who thinks otherwise just doesn't get it.
If you can honestly answer that all or even a large amount of reasonable precautions were taken and this still happened than we will politely agree to disagree.
 
It’s a shame Newsome caused this drought during rainy season and high winds. California hasn’t been known to have forest fires for its entire existence.

-MAGAt Dipshits
You’re truly a sipshit if you believe this! Newsome has run California into the ground. California is one of the few states that has a fire season. He cut budget to clean up the dead brush, knowing it’s a ticking timebomb. Water storage that was unused, budget cuts, etc. Newsome ha run California into the ground while homelessness has doubled under his watch. He’s a piece of shit and you are right there with him trying to defend him. This interaction with a disgruntled bystander who just lost everything shows his true colors as he lied to her face in front of the whole world.
 
You’re truly a sipshit if you believe this! Newsome has run California into the ground. California is one of the few states that has a fire season. He cut budget to clean up the dead brush, knowing it’s a ticking timebomb. Water storage that was unused, budget cuts, etc. Newsome ha run California into the ground while homelessness has doubled under his watch. He’s a piece of shit and you are right there with him trying to defend him. This interaction with a disgruntled bystander who just lost everything shows his true colors as he lied to her face in front of the whole world.


Guys, guys like the retard above are why this country is in trouble. This idiot LOVES government cuts, unless he can blame a disaster created by a traditionally fire prone region + climate change + they have Democratic leadership. Yet here is the same MAGAt moron. This is your brain in a bubble of low IQ Trump Cult diqqsuckers..

You sir, are full of sh!t!
The effective tax rate was lowered in 2017 for all tax brackets. If you made 75k, trump tax cuts helped you. Kamala is set to let it expire, your effective tax rate will increase if she becomes president. Look up effective tax rate 2015vs 2017- we all benefited.
Also- you realize the top 1% pay 47% of taxes in America. How are they not paying their fair share?

And you would be wrong. Tell me how a married couple making 100k will fair better once Trumps tax cuts expire? It’s not just for those making $400k and up. Literally every tax bracket will be impacted. Also, please explain how the top 1% who pay 48% of all income tax are not paying their fair share? What do you think will happen to corporations if they have to pay 35% tax rate? You don’t need to be the head cashier at Walmart to solve.
 
They did, and could they have been contained better? Definitely. Would more water have helped? Probably, would the water pressure been better if they had been contained better? Fairly certain yes on that. It has been somewhat of a perfect storm with the winds and lack of prevention that occurred. Bio thinks that all of it was unavoidable, that anyone who thinks otherwise just doesn't get it.
If you can honestly answer that all or even a large amount of reasonable precautions were taken and this still happened than we will politely agree to disagree.
I’m not sure these things are all mutually exclusive. I am not saying they’ve done everything perfectly - lord knows they’ve been doing this for long enough they’ve got plans for as much as they can anticipate…but things go wrong too. People screw up, local weather conditions hamper your preferred options, equipment fails.

California has a LONG history of wildfires obviously. I don’t buy that they haven’t taken as many precautions as they could.

From what I understand, the initial fire was caused by arson?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
I’m not sure these things are all mutually exclusive. I am not saying they’ve done everything perfectly - lord knows they’ve been doing this for long enough they’ve got plans for as much as they can anticipate…but things go wrong too. People screw up, local weather conditions hamper your preferred options, equipment fails.

California has a LONG history of wildfires obviously. I don’t buy that they haven’t taken as many precautions as they could.

From what I understand, the initial fire was caused by arson?

What was “his job”
These MAGAt retards don’t know or want us not to know this is record a record HALF YEAR drought for California.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IANDFAN
I’m not sure these things are all mutually exclusive. I am not saying they’ve done everything perfectly - lord knows they’ve been doing this for long enough they’ve got plans for as much as they can anticipate…but things go wrong too. People screw up, local weather conditions hamper your preferred options, equipment fails.

California has a LONG history of wildfires obviously. I don’t buy that they haven’t taken as many precautions as they could.

From what I understand, the initial fire was caused by arson?
I think I saw that at least one of the fires was arson. Not sure if it was the first.
I don't buy that they did take as many precautions as they could. It is a challenging balance but the optics of cutting the budget, not doing routine under brush removal and having a reservoir not ready to go as the fire season approached seem like tragic missteps. I will not claim to know the details and the how/why but the outside view for some of this is not good. Misplaced values and appropriations. The people trying to blame it all on the historic drought/hurricane winds, etc. are just as wrong as the people blaming it solely on the democratic leadership. Unfortunately the way our society functions there will not be an objective analysis of the things leading up to this issue. It will be politicized on each side instead of just doing the right things.
 
No, Politicians are blamed for shitty responses to natural disasters. It just so happens that seemingly 9/10 (probably) of the shitty responses to natural disasters are led by Republicans. Jeb Bush never had this problem so it is possible for Republicans to lead responsibly, it just seems like hitting the lowest possible standard and then blaming a Democrat somewhere is how they operate these days.
Disagree. DeSantis does a phenomenal job especially given the frequency of his state's natural disasters.
 
These MAGAt retards don’t know or want us not to know this is record a record HALF YEAR drought for California.
These faires could have been managed better. Just because the leaders are Democrats does not mean they are immune to criticism. At least to normal people.

Get over it @BioHawk and @Menace Sockeyes. This comes with the territory. They should expect to be second guessed rather than expect not to be.
 
These faires could have been managed better. Just because the leaders are Democrats does not mean they are immune to criticism. At least to normal people.

Get over it @BioHawk and @Menace Sockeyes. This comes with the territory. They should expect to be second guessed rather than expect not to be.
The difference between MAGAts and people with fully functioning brains is we don’t check a political affiliation of leadership to see if we start posting poutrage immediately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IANDFAN
The difference between MAGAts and people with fully functioning brains is we don’t check a political affiliation of leadership to see if we start posting poutrage immediately.
You're simply upset your party is in leadership rather than Republicans. The story isn't "republicans pounce' the story is horrible leadership and shortsightedness. Lets stick to the topic at hand.

Were Democrat (or in fairness current California leadership) policies complicit in the disaster or not?
 
Natural disaster ravages California : DEMOCRAT GOVERNOR SUCKS!!

Natural disaster ravages Florida, Tennessee, etc : DEMOCRATS CONTROL THE WEATHER!!
You forgot about DeathSantis wearing silly boots and destroying the insurance industry….Also being mean and not answering Kamala’s phone calls.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DeangeloVickers
In fact, in nature, it is the fire that is responsible for removing that debris.
Agreed. 100%. Except this debris in this forest served as fuel for fires in an area adjacent to millions of dollars in homes.

But sure, in a vacuum, in nature these fires are considered a normal part of renewal.

Listen, I know what I am talking about here, if a disaster happens and the city could have foreseen consequences of a disaster and didnt do mitigation they will be held at least at fault by the citizenry and at most liable by courts.
 
Agreed. 100%. Except this debris in this forest served as fuel for fires in an area adjacent to millions of dollars in homes.

But sure, in a vacuum, in nature these fires are considered a normal part of renewal.

Listen, I know what I am talking about here, if a disaster happens and the city could have foreseen consequences of a disaster and didnt do mitigation they will be held at least at fault by the citizenry and at most liable by courts.
How do you know what you’re talking about here?
 
Guys, guys like the retard above are why this country is in trouble. This idiot LOVES government cuts, unless he can blame a disaster created by a traditionally fire prone region + climate change + they have Democratic leadership. Yet here is the same MAGAt moron. This is your brain in a bubble of low IQ Trump Cult diqqsuckers..
I love that I live rent free in your head. You even took the time to go back on my posts and do research.you either have a lot of time on your hands or I have a stalker. If you want my number just ask.
I stand by my statements. I have yet to hear a rebuttal on how Newsome miss management is not to blame?
 
I do know about governing yes. I am not about to mention why, no.

I also wrote this in a prior post, in this very thread.

"But again, I am not an expert here"

I have already admitted I am not a wildfire expert.

I do know when and how, on the local level, that there are responsibilities and failure to meet those responsibilities have consequences. City governments make policy, pass ordinances and set budgets and priorities. If funds were diverted for some priorities and removed from others, if that goes south, they are left holding that bag. And should they be. And the voters have every right to question why the officials they elected didn't do their jobs.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT