no more tranny’s allowed in the Army

[stanzithemanzi12]

Who said anything about gay and lesbians?

They love to try to mix the two. They do it all the time at these libtards rallies where they'll have the gheys, trans, black lives matter, and pro-palestinian folks all together like they are some unified force, lol.

Throw in the blue and purple haired feminists and pink pussy hat wearers too.

 

[TennNole17]

Who cares, same dumb argument about men playing women’s sports.
Ask the women who have to boycott games because of bio-male invasion

Cool good answer.

 

[The Tradition]

They love to try to mix the two. Might as well throw in Black Lives Matter while they're at it.

This. They won the right to gay marriage and suddenly we had to accept BTQ+, too.

 

[Scruddy]

You are convoluting things. It has never been an exclusive club. What branch did you serve in?

Nobody talks about DEI more than MAGAs. I had to look up the term first time it was referenced.

So you are saying we should go back to a segregated Army? Ban women?

Good for you

Nobody talks about dei more than maga?? LOL we've seen the hundreds of billions of dollars that dems have spent on this now, the receipts are out there. Don't play stupid like this isn't one of the main priorities to team blue.

 

[TennNole17]

I had to look up the term first time it was referenced.

 

[Jimmy McGill]

 

[HawkNester]

If the question is, "Do you want to keep your fake boobs or your dick?" I won't have to answer that question.

Deflection

 

[The Tradition]

Otter #1 is getting ready to get knocked out by Otter #2 in that pic.

 

[Tom Paris]

Likewise, I'm sure.

Bigot. Eat a bag of dicks.

 

[The Tradition]

Bigot. Eat a bag of dicks.

Maybe if we could sneak transgendered "women" into an all-women's battlefield then it would be a strategic advantage.

 

[zappaa]

They love to try to mix the two. They do it all the time at these libtards rallies where they'll have the gheys, trans, black lives matter, and pro-palestinian folks all together like they are some unified force, lol.

Throw in the blue and purple haired feminists and pink pussy hat wearers too.

I know plenty of gay men and women, tranny’s are ruining the their neighborhoods

 

[Tom Paris]

I disagree wholeheartedly with that. The military is not a charity and should not welcome anyone "willing" to join.

It should be an exclusive club of those able to serve effectively and honorably, and contribute toward the mission.

And the "mission" is not DEI.

What the hell? I mean, I know you’re an asshole but you’re taking it to another level in this thread. So Republican to take shots at people who are willing to die for their country. This kind of shit is why I hate many of my fellow Americans.

 

[zappaa]

Sounds like you want to reduce the number of soldiers who fight in the War on Terror. Not sure what Islamist would do. Something similar to what our military did at Abu Ghraib???

Piss on those racist murderers

 

[The Tradition]

What the hell? I mean, I know you’re an asshole but you’re taking it to another level in this thread. So Republican to take shots at people who are willing to die for their country. This kind of shit is why I hate many of my fellow Americans.

It is NOT a social club. It's an organization based on killing the enemy.

 

[zappaa]

What the hell? I mean, I know you’re an asshole but you’re taking it to another level in this thread. So Republican to take shots at people who are willing to die for their country. This kind of shit is why I hate many of my fellow Americans.

4F
Go sell war bonds

 

[Jimmy McGill]

It is NOT a social club. It's an organization based on killing the enemy.

What branch did you serve in again?

 

[BrianNole777]

What branch did you serve in again?

Coast Guard, I think.

 

[The Tradition]

What branch did you serve in again?

Coast Guard. Semper Paratus.

 

[Jimmy McGill]

Coast Guard. Semper Paratus.

So that makes you an expert on warfare?

 

[The Tradition]

So that makes you an expert on warfare?

Maybe you'd like hot-racking with a tranny on a USCG cutter?

 

[Jimmy McGill]

Maybe you'd like hot-racking with a tranny on a USCG cutter?

Wouldn't bother me a bit, because i'm not an insecure person

 

[goldmom]

Question: how many transgender people were/are enrolled in the services?

Good question.

 

[goldmom]

Bigot. Eat a bag of dicks.

Tsk tsk. Easy there coach.

 

[Joes Place]

This. They won the right to gay marriage and suddenly we had to accept BTQ+, too.

Who is making you "accept" it?

You can look the other way.

 

[goldmom]

What the hell? I mean, I know you’re an asshole but you’re taking it to another level in this thread. So Republican to take shots at people who are willing to die for their country. This kind of shit is why I hate many of my fellow Americans.

You’re consistently a very sad and foolish person.

 

[The Tradition]

Who is making you "accept" it?

You can look the other way.

The EEOC, for one...

 

[Jimmy McGill]

No reason for this to be political. If folks want to serve their country, let them. It is about human decency.

 

[Joes Place]

tranny’s are ruining the their neighborhoods

On top of that, they're destroying your ability to use proper grammar!!!!!

 

[Joes Place]

The EEOC, for one...

How are they making YOU "accept" it?

You seem to have the need to deny people "like you" of basic Constitutional rights.

 

[Joes Place]

The EEOC, for one...

Oh....so you cannot DISCRIMINATE against people....

We always knew you were a bigot. Thx for clarifying that.

 

[goldmom]

No reason for this to be political. If folks want to serve their country, let them. It is about human decency.

As long as they still got a trigger finger I’m good with them serving. They’re Americans who volunteered to serve.

 

[Jimmy McGill]

As long as they still got a trigger finger I’m good with them serving. They’re Americans who volunteered to serve.

Thank you. I was beginning to lose some faith

 

[The Tradition]

No reason for this to be political. If folks want to serve their country AND ARE QUALIFIED TO DO SO WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING ESPRIT DE CORPS, let them. It is about human decency.

FIFY.

 

[Jimmy McGill]

FIFY.

But, we used to have segregated servicemen? You can't win this one. I'm often wrong on some things. But when I served in combat, I could have cared less if the person next to me was a femaie, a shemaie, a gay, a transgender. I just know I had their 6 and vice versa.

Sorry my friend, we are not going to go back in time when folks had to hide who they are. If that makes you feel uncomfortable.....that is a you thing

 

[srams21]

What do you suppose an Islamic terrorist prison guard would do to a captured American transgendered soldier?

I'll hang up and listen.

I'm pretty sure when you sign up for the military, you accept those possibilities.

 

[The Tradition]

Oh....so you cannot DISCRIMINATE against people....

We always knew you were a bigot. Thx for clarifying that.

Employers discriminate against people all the time. They discriminate based on educational achievement, experience, professional licensure or certification, immigration status, attitude, personality, and even attractiveness....

Employers can discriminate based on anything that is not statutorily protected. These protected classes include race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy, disability, etc., etc., etc.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination based on sex. Obviously, in 1964 congress meant "women" when they passed that law. They didn't mean the entire rainbow of LGBTQ+.

 

[Joes Place]

Employers discriminate against people all the time. They discriminate based on educational achievement, experience, professional licensure or certification

That's not what "discrimination" is.

Those are called "qualifications" for jobs.
You'd THINK that someone w/ an HR background would know this stuff

 

[The Tradition]

That's not what "discrimination" is.

Those are called "qualifications" for jobs.
You'd THINK that someone w/ an HR background would know this stuff

To be more complete, you're talking about bona fide occupational qualifications.

Thank God Hooters won the lawsuit against the asshole who wanted to be a "Hooter's Guy" waitress.

 

[Jimmy McGill]

Employers discriminate against people all the time. They discriminate based on educational achievement, experience, professional licensure or certification, immigration status, attitude, personality, and even attractiveness....

Employers can discriminate based on anything that is not statutorily protected. These protected classes include race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy, disability, etc., etc., etc.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination based on sex. Obviously, in 1964 congress meant "women" when they passed that law. They didn't mean the entire rainbow of LGBTQ+.

So I'm going to get you on the record.

1.) you think discrimination is okay


2.) You don;t believe gays or transgenders should be allowed in the military

3. ) You are in H.R.?

4. ) What is the name of your company? (optional)

5.) why do you hate people that are not like you?

 

[The Tradition]

So I'm going to get you on the record.

1.) you think discrimination is okay


2.) You don;t believe gays or transgenders should be allowed in the military

3. ) You are in H.R.?

4. ) What is the name of your company? (optional)

5.) why do you hate people that are not like you?

Unlawful discrimination is not okay.

Everything else is on the table.

I believe that the EEOC overreached and the courts erred in extending the definition of "sex" discrimination to mean anything other than biological sex. If Congress wants to outlaw discrimination based on LGBTQ+ then a new, more explicit law should be passed.

I have no issue with people who are different than me, but the EEOC shouldn't require me to not discriminate against them without an explicit law making such discrimination unlawful.

Yes, I've been working in the HR profession for 35 years. I work for YoMama Corp.

And no, I don't believe that the entire rainbow of LGBTQ+ should be forced on the military, AGAIN, with no law explicitly requiring that.