Hate to see the post-transition pic lol.must be transitioning.... LOL
Hate to see the post-transition pic lol.must be transitioning.... LOL
That’s a fair point. I think if they continue to play better together and finish the season strong Sides does deserve credit where credit is due. With that said, I’ve also been pretty frustrated and confused with playing time of certain players, substitutions, and why Sides sometimes is directing them to play in a way that doesn’t always play to their (especially Caitlin’s) strengths. I guess we’ll see what happens…I'm curious when the coach is going to get any credit for this? When the team was bad it was all her fault, you know. And no I'm not a big fan of the coach, I just get weary of it always being the coach's fault, according to many on this Board, when things don't go well.
You're not the only one who is confused and frustrated. I share your sentiment entirely. Yes, Sides does deserve credit at times, as you've said. Her coaching is at best inconsistent and her rotations and sets are questionable. I believe that you have addressed one of the bigger problems that she has, that she doesn't use Clark the way she should at times, maximizing CC's efficiency. Hopefully this will turn around, but honestly, I'm just not seeing it yet.That’s a fair point. I think if they continue to play better together and finish the season strong Sides does deserve credit where credit is due. With that said, I’ve also been pretty frustrated and confused with playing time of certain players, substitutions, and why Sides sometimes is directing them to play in a way that doesn’t always play to their (especially Caitlin’s) strengths. I guess we’ll see what happens…
She's definitely a two steps forward and one step back coach. She has done some things to irritate me but then I have seen her correct some of those issues. Either she is listening to the criticism or she is already well aware of them and it is just taking time to get the players to do it properly. I hope it's the second one. It's clear that there are some players who are stubborn and slow to change. I'm not sure there are any coaches that can make them change quicker short of removing them from the team.You're not the only one who is confused and frustrated. I share your sentiment entirely. Yes, Sides does deserve credit at times, as you've said. Her coaching is at best inconsistent and her rotations and sets are questionable. I believe that you have addressed one of the bigger problems that she has, that she doesn't use Clark the way she should at times, maximizing CC's efficiency. Hopefully this will turn around, but honestly, I'm just not seeing it yet.
The Fever GM should get players who are going to be good in the system. This is Clark's team, and they need to build around her.
She a very bad Jude of talent. Hull /wallace alone is criminal.She's definitely a two steps forward and one step back coach. She has done some things to irritate me but then I have seen her correct some of those issues. Either she is listening to the criticism or she is already well aware of them and it is just taking time to get the players to do it properly. I hope it's the second one. It's clear that there are some players who are stubborn and slow to change. I'm not sure there are any coaches that can make them change quicker short of removing them from the team.
At this point, I'm not sure what they should do. If they keep her, she needs to find someone with a lot of experience to help her out. She seems to be very poor at in game adjustments, or the players are very poor at executing the adjustments that she wants made. Having an experienced coach on hand could really help make those recognitions faster and the proper adjustment implemented sooner. Not all changes need to wait until half time.
If they fire her, obviously find the best coach out there to coach the future of the league.
That last possession is proof that Sides is clueless. She has to go.Just watched the last possession and for the life of me I can't figure out why the rule isn't "If there is less than 20 seconds left on the clock, the ball is in Clark's hands unless they sell out so hard to keep that from happening there is a clear open shot available under the basket". Clark is either going to draw the double team, leaving someone open for Clark to find or she is going to be able to create her own shot and go for 3. This shouldn't be that hard of a concept to figure out.
Agree. I recall her telling the Media that there was an effort issue with "The Team (Or the players)." If that's the case, then tell them to get on board, or simply get rid of them. That's why I mentioned Linn Dunn earlier. As you've said, if it's a "coaching thing" where she could use good in-game advice, then I'd consider that as well. There are only seventeen games remaining, but with the All Star/Olympics break coming up on July 20th, she and her staff can work to further try to figure things out until play resumes on Aug. 16.She's definitely a two steps forward and one step back coach. She has done some things to irritate me but then I have seen her correct some of those issues. Either she is listening to the criticism or she is already well aware of them and it is just taking time to get the players to do it properly. I hope it's the second one. It's clear that there are some players who are stubborn and slow to change. I'm not sure there are any coaches that can make them change quicker short of removing them from the team.
At this point, I'm not sure what they should do. If they keep her, she needs to find someone with a lot of experience to help her out. She seems to be very poor at in game adjustments, or the players are very poor at executing the adjustments that she wants made. Having an experienced coach on hand could really help make those recognitions faster and the proper adjustment implemented sooner. Not all changes need to wait until half time.
If they fire her, obviously find the best coach out there to coach the future of the league.
Remember Clark standing near the top of the key until time ran out? Is that what she drew up? The color commentator applauded the defense for getting the stop, but to me it just looked like a confusing mess.That last possession is proof that Sides is clueless. She has to go.
Agreed, I was thinking they should’ve drafted Clark, Brink, Cardoso, and Rickea Jackson.When did I say not draft Clark? Are you psychotic?
I'm a normal person, so I forgot what number Cardoso was drafted at because the draft was 3 months ago. Stop crying.
They didn't have time to pass twice there. You have to run screens for CC, get her open and have her let it fly. So the play was doomed from the start.Remember Clark standing near the top of the key until time ran out? Is that what she drew up? The color commentator applauded the defense for getting the stop, but to me it just looked like a confusing mess.
And traded Wallace to the Aces for A’ja Wilson during the preseason. I can’t believe the opportunities they’ve squandered.Agreed, I was thinking they should’ve drafted Clark, Brink, Cardoso, and Rickea Jackson.
Too many disingenuous, crybaby, cocksuckers on this forum. But none of you have the balls to argue in good faith anyway.Agreed, I was thinking they should’ve drafted Clark, Brink, Cardoso, and Rickea Jackson.
Congrats bro, you got me on forgetting the order in who was drafted. Truly, good job, 10 out of 10.Well, good Lord. Your on here saying they should have grabbed Cardosa. Between her, and Brink and Clark they were all going to be top 5 picks. I mean that statement is as stupid as the people who say the Fever need to trade Wallace and Wheeler, like anyone with a brain would trade ANY decent player with value for that scrap heap....
Yeah, I was off on the description. What really happened was even worse lol.Angel was stuck on 9 points and 13 rebounds. Watch the video below & note the score and time left (15 seconds).
Chicago was up 7, had the ball, and 99.999% of the time the team leading would just dribble out the clock.
But no! As everyone can see, Angel was desperate, demanding the ball, and had to get that double double.
She got fouled, hit both FTs and ended up with 11 points & 13 rebounds.
What a joke.
I would say they are winning despite coaching.That’s a fair point. I think if they continue to play better together and finish the season strong Sides does deserve credit where credit is due. With that said, I’ve also been pretty frustrated and confused with playing time of certain players, substitutions, and why Sides sometimes is directing them to play in a way that doesn’t always play to their (especially Caitlin’s) strengths. I guess we’ll see what happens…
June 23 – Indiana Fever @ Chicago Sky (ESPN) | 2.302 million |
June 16 – Chicago Sky @ Indiana Fever (CBS) | 2.25 million |
May 14 – Indiana Fever @ Connecticut Sun (ESPN2) | 2.12 million |
June 30 – Indiana Fever @ Phoenic Mercury (ESPN) | 1.93 million |
May 18- Indiana Fever @ New York Liberty (ABC) | 1.71 million |
May 20 – Connecticut Sun @ Indiana Fever (ESPN) | 1.56 million |
June 1- Chicago Sky vs Indiana Fever (ESPN) | 1.53 million |
July 2 – Indiana Fever vs Las Vegas Aces (ESPN) | 1.45 million |
May 18 – Los Angeles Sparks @ Las Vegas Aces (ABC) | 1.34 million |
June 21 – Indiana Fever @ Atlanta Dream (ION) | 1.18 million |
June 7 – Indiana Fever @ Washington Mystics (ION) | 1.023 million |
June 8 – New York Liberty @ Connecticut Sun (ABC) | 962,000 |
May 24 – Indiana Fever @ Los Angeles Sparks (ION) | 724,000 |
That's a hell of a stat to keep an eye on!Sarcasm, I know, but she has 4. The WNBA record is 6 for asst/point DD. Courtney Vandersloot did that in 2017. Clark is now tied for second. She will have this record soon.
I hear you, but the CC/AR thing smacks of the political polarization in this country. Both sides thinks the other are full of idiots, and will not change their mind. Hopefully, the actual media members who vote will be reasonable and agree with the correct CC side.That's a hell of a stat to keep an eye on!
Seems to me if Caitlin can grab the record in that type of consecutive double-doubles, what I'll call a guard's double-double, then that should blunt all this double-double mania.
Of course idiots will still blab about 14+ but 7+ for a guard would be objectively just as impressive,
Yep, that's why I said it should silence that argument. It won't, but hopefully it would resonate with objective undecided people, so to speak, especially those in the media.I hear you, but the CC/AR thing smacks of the political polarization in this country. Both sides thinks the other are full of idiots, and will not change their mind. Hopefully, the actual media members who vote will be reasonable and agree with the correct CC side.
But Reese fans are so lost. It's not even objective measures to have the claims that they do.I hear you, but the CC/AR thing smacks of the political polarization in this country. Both sides thinks the other are full of idiots, and will not change their mind. Hopefully, the actual media members who vote will be reasonable and agree with the correct CC side.
I was hoping it could begin to rival the Ukraine thread for views and posts, but...Now that we have a separate WBB forum, can we start to create new threads for individual WNBA games? This mega thread is getting unwieldy.
15 of CC's 29 points came in the 4th qtr.
6 points: 2-2 from three
4 points: 2-4 from two
5 points: 5-6 FTs
I posted earlier after a loss that this team is a collection of garbage. I saw Hull was starting but figured it was for KLS not Smith. I also posted that after this year they need to keep the core 3 and possibly Fagbenle and just start over. There literally isn't one useful player that would be of any help on any other team in the league.I wonder if things are finally coming to a head with Smith's atrocious defense...
Why more Fever lineup changes? 'A coach’s decision and we’re just gonna leave it at that.'
Caitlin Clark, Kelsey Mitchell and Aliyah Boston are solidified starters. The other two spots might as well be drawn out of a hat from game to game.www.indystar.com
THIS.make everyone realize that this is CC22's team
I posted this in the ROY thread. Things are trending up for CC. It makes the pushing of AR's narrative recently that much more puzzling.That's a hell of a stat to keep an eye on!
Seems to me if Caitlin can grab the record in that type of consecutive double-doubles, what I'll call a guard's double-double, then that should blunt all this double-double mania.
Of course idiots will still blab about 14+ but 7+ for a guard would be objectively just as impressive,
Dude, she's on the Aussie team. Who do you think they had to pick from? Ever wonder why the US women cream everybody every year? Case in point.......I saw that Wallace had like 4 min playing time and scored a bucket. She also turned the ball over twice. This is someone who was selected to an Olympic team. I'm happy she's on the bench now though. Think of it. The year she's had so far, and she's an Olympian.
Talk about crying. Lolol.. I mean if your saying that you have watched the Fever's games, and they've played the Sky three times already they have talked COUNTLESS times in where CC. Cardosa, and Reese were drafted. I'd think you would have an idea with out having to remember back to the draft order in May. It's easy to say that Dunn, (she's the Fevers GM in case you didn't know that), screwed the pooch by not drafting another big, but who was an available post that would have made a difference after Brink, (the #2 pick), and Cardosa the #3 pick?Too many disingenuous, crybaby, cocksuckers on this forum. But none of you have the balls to argue in good faith anyway.
Congrats bro, you got me on forgetting the order in who was drafted. Truly, good job, 10 out of 10.
Still doesn't change the fact that the Fever should have also drafted a big, not two guards who they ended up letting go.
I agree. Putting her on that team was a gift, a feel good thing.Dude, she's on the Aussie team. Who do you think they had to pick from? Ever wonder why the US women cream everybody every year? Case in point.......
I actually don't disagree. At a minimum she knows what she has in CC22 and also actually think players would like playing her style of ball.Lisa Bluder needs to be called after the season for an open position in Indiana.
Reese fans clearly do not want to see any differences between guard and post (because it doesn't help their argument...........)That's a hell of a stat to keep an eye on!
Seems to me if Caitlin can grab the record in that type of consecutive double-doubles, what I'll call a guard's double-double, then that should blunt all this double-double mania.
Of course idiots will still blab about 14+ but 7+ for a guard would be objectively just as impressive,
Don't forget "win shares" and all those important advanced metrics.................These people downplay Clark despite Clark leading Reese in nearly everything but rebounds.
Key word, where, not when. Analysts are never talking about the draft order. I also turned off the draft as soon as I saw CC get drafted, because no one else mattered to me. Again, anyone normal doesn't know off the top of their head who was drafted at what time. I was under the impression that the Fever had a second first round pick, but instead that was the Sky, Sparks, and Wings. But your arguments aren't convincing, nor do they change my mind that the Fever shouldn't have tried drafting a center.Talk about crying. Lolol.. I mean if your saying that you have watched the Fever's games, and they've played the Sky three times already they have talked COUNTLESS times in where CC. Cardosa, and Reese were drafted. I'd think you would have an idea with out having to remember back to the draft order in May. It's easy to say that Dunn, (she's the Fevers GM in case you didn't know that), screwed the pooch by not drafting another big, but who was an available post that would have made a difference after Brink, (the #2 pick), and Cardosa the #3 pick?
Stats can be used to justify anything, they just have to pick the stats that back up their argument. Most of the media folks and WNBA “experts” don’t understand Caitlin’s game, so they crap on it because it doesn’t fit into their small area of understanding.Reese fans clearly do not want to see any differences between guard and post (because it doesn't help their argument...........)