ADVERTISEMENT

*****Official Cubs 2019 thread*****

There are many internet posting fans of every MLB team similar to mstp.

Went to a couple other platforms that have Cards sites last night as Harrison Bader played during his recall return game, the reaction to his play was "interesting" to say the least.

Two magnificent CF catches, 3 BB's, triple...completely different hitter at the plate.

A month's worth of anger was poured out at Shildt playing infielders in the OF while Bader was gone. Winning the game was somewhat of an afterthought. Venting that anger was the order of the day.

I didn't have the heart to remind them of SSS, the mostly bad Milwaukee pitching, etc.

We sports fans are an interesting lot, the emotions we display on the internet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
I expect this team to play far better than they’ve shown. I refuse to accept laziness or complacency from the players.

Errors (in any facet of the game) made from aggressive play can be tolerated.

Errors made from mental lapses or succumbing to the pressures of the game are intolerable.

Ryan, Wick, and Kimbrel were stellar last night, and pitched like I expect of them.
 
Wick continues to be a relegation. I was glad to see Kimbrel look good in his inning. Two balls carried pretty well, but he kept the ball in the strike zone, and had great velocity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
Wick continues to be a relegation. I was glad to see Kimbrel look good in his inning. Two balls carried pretty well, but he kept the ball in the strike zone, and had great velocity.
Walks by relievers are killers. Kimbrel will keep getting better, I believe. It's been an odd season for him and I'm not sure even without the trip to the IL that he'd be at 100% at this point of the season. Really need him in his classic form for the September stretch run.

That's why all these stupid losses throughout the season, especially on the road, have pissed me off to no end. Cubs are 12th in the NL in save percentage; 23 blown saves out of 55 chances. Turn around even 3 or 4 of those and the rest of the season looks a lot different.

Fortunately, the Cubs have a lot of home games where they seem to have a better mindset than they do on the road.
 
The biggest disappointment to me (other than continuing to not develop pitching) is the move from 28 to 29 this year. The Cubs were obviously going to fall after 2015 - you can't take Bryant, Russell, Baez, Schwarber, Soler and Contreras out of your minor league system and stay #1. Then they dealt Torres, Jimenez, Cease, Candelario, Vogelbach and Soler in other deals, so them falling to mid/late 20s makes sense when those farm system rankings most heavily weight A) elite prospects and B) guys closer to the majors. It made sense that whatever the Cubs had for a "next wave" of talent would be lower in the system.

Last year, the Cubs were down with the Red Sox who promoted significant numbers of guys the past few years and took a toll....but rather than stay stagnant, the Sox have bounced up to #22 this year. The Cubs need to take a good, hard look at what they're doing in terms of player development. It's abundantly clear that teams like the Astros and Dodgers are absolutely kicking everyone's butts in that category.

There are still talented guys in the minors, including some pitching. I think Alzolay has a chance to make the rotation next season and Brailyn Marquez has been absolutely unhittable at times. I like the Fresno kid they took #1 this year.....but they need more than those guys plus Hoerner, Amaya and a couple others.
Here is an article by Brett Taylor at BN. Sure, he is a homer, but he doesn't wear blinders. The Cubs will probably have for top 100 prospects when the post season rankings are released. That is good. There is some better organizational depth than people realize, and this past draft, and this Summer's IFA (Long ways away), were good. Theo and Jed do deserve credit for their work in the IFA, and reorganizing priorities the last two drafts when it comes to pitching.
https://www.bleachernation.com/2019...-baseball-america-as-the-second-worst-in-mlb/
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
Here is an article by Brett Taylor at BN. Sure, he is a homer, but he doesn't wear blinders. The Cubs will probably have for top 100 prospects when the post season rankings are released. That is good. There is some better organizational depth than people realize, and this past draft, and this Summer's IFA (Long ways away), were good. Theo and Jed do deserve credit for their work in the IFA, and reorganizing priorities the last two drafts when it comes to pitching.
https://www.bleachernation.com/2019...-baseball-america-as-the-second-worst-in-mlb/

Brett Taylor and his sidekick Cerami are not journalists, but homers. Don't get excited about the Cubs farm until neutral writers praise it.
 
I would go into this with literally nobody untouchable, but understanding that the best players would require a haul to be moved. A deal for Javy or KB, in particular, would need to have massive returns.

As already stated, I think Rizzo (for his contract and production) and Contreras (given the Cubs catching depth and his offense) are two guys who could get a really good haul back for the Cubs. KB or Javy would do as much or better, but I think those are guys you try to lock in long-term.

Schwarber could be an interesting sweetener. He's not going to become the elite slugger Theo thought he would, but he's still a solid lefty power bat who won't cost much for the next two seasons until he hits FA for the first time. He'll get some arb raises, but if he continues to be who he has been the past 3 seasons, he'll produce at or above what he costs. A team playing in a park with a short RF porch who needs a DH could do a hell of a lot worse than Kyle Schwarber.

Happ is suddenly very much in play again as a future piece of this team or as a significant trade piece. He has clearly made changes from his time in AAA this year and is hitting much more like the prospect people thought he was....and he's under team control through the 2023 season.

I'm not sure what the trade market would be for Lester. He's expensive and clearly on the back side of his career, but he can also still pitch. Quintana could be a trade piece, but for what he's making, I'm not sure they're better off without him. Darvish could opt out of his contract, but I doubt he will and I'm not sure he's all that tradeable. Chatwood might be tradeable, especially if he shows that he can be a good bullpen arm down the stretch.

I would like to see the Cubs find a way to sign Castellanos and I agree that a roster shakeup is warranted. I hope that the Cubs can finally get a homegrown arm for that 5th rotation spot (Alzolay, perhaps), which would basically free up the $20M they're paying for Hamels now. There's not going to be a ton of new money to spend unless the Ricketts family decides go allow Theo to go significantly over the luxury tax threshold.....but I do think there's a lot they could do if they hit the trade market.

I think Rizzo is the last guy you trade from that bunch for the following reasons:

1. The production has bounced back towards his 2014-2016 levels, which has pleasantly surprised me. Even at 2017-2018 levels, he is still very good.

2. The Cubs only owe him $14.5 each of the next two seasons. Anthony is a study in why one should bet on themselves. Him leaving a lot of money on the table has helped offset the bad Heyward and Darvish contracts.

3. Intangibles. Tony is this generation's Mr. Cub, the heartbeat if you will. I think the best execs are a bit ruthless, but I would make an exception with Rizzo. 44 needs to hang from the foul pole.

Regarding a Bryant extension, I want nothing to do with him in his 30's unless it's a team friendly discount (unlikely because Boras is the puppet master). This is yet another season of him failing to produce at 2016 levels and while he overall production is best on the team, I suspect that he will want too much. I'd be willing to pay him $25M through his age 34 year, not nothing more than that. His defense is already starting to regress, and his one truly elite skill (baserunning) will not age. Additionally, he has a unique inability to play through nagging injuries. I like Kris, but I imagine Boras will be looking for something that will pay him $30M+ through agre 37, and I'd want no part of that.

Contreras is the guy I would like to see them trade. Folks in this thread no longer argue that he is a good catcher because of adm strength and pop time. I'd like to get a really good defensive catcher and replace Willson's bat elsewhere on the diamond. I may be a bit biased as Contreras is the one Cubs player who I don't personally care for (I like passion, bit Willson is the spaz that we all played with in youth baseball).
 
I think Rizzo is the last guy you trade from that bunch for the following reasons:

1. The production has bounced back towards his 2014-2016 levels, which has pleasantly surprised me. Even at 2017-2018 levels, he is still very good.

2. The Cubs only owe him $14.5 each of the next two seasons. Anthony is a study in why one should bet on themselves. Him leaving a lot of money on the table has helped offset the bad Heyward and Darvish contracts.

3. Intangibles. Tony is this generation's Mr. Cub, the heartbeat if you will. I think the best execs are a bit ruthless, but I would make an exception with Rizzo. 44 needs to hang from the foul pole.

Regarding a Bryant extension, I want nothing to do with him in his 30's unless it's a team friendly discount (unlikely because Boras is the puppet master). This is yet another season of him failing to produce at 2016 levels and while he overall production is best on the team, I suspect that he will want too much. I'd be willing to pay him $25M through his age 34 year, not nothing more than that. His defense is already starting to regress, and his one truly elite skill (baserunning) will not age. Additionally, he has a unique inability to play through nagging injuries. I like Kris, but I imagine Boras will be looking for something that will pay him $30M+ through agre 37, and I'd want no part of that.

Contreras is the guy I would like to see them trade. Folks in this thread no longer argue that he is a good catcher because of adm strength and pop time. I'd like to get a really good defensive catcher and replace Willson's bat elsewhere on the diamond. I may be a bit biased as Contreras is the one Cubs player who I don't personally care for (I like passion, bit Willson is the spaz that we all played with in youth baseball).
Bravo!
 
Brett Taylor and his sidekick Cerami are not journalists, but homers. Don't get excited about the Cubs farm until neutral writers praise it.
Okay, and if the Cubs have four top 100 prospects you'll say what? I clearly stated that Taylor is a homer. I don't think that is up for debate when discussing a guy who runs a Cubs website. But, he is passionate, and comprehensive.
 
Zobrist has not been hitting on his rehab tour. He'll be in Des Moines this weekend. I might drier over for Saturday's game to check him out.
 
I think Rizzo is the last guy you trade from that bunch for the following reasons:

1. The production has bounced back towards his 2014-2016 levels, which has pleasantly surprised me. Even at 2017-2018 levels, he is still very good.

2. The Cubs only owe him $14.5 each of the next two seasons. Anthony is a study in why one should bet on themselves. Him leaving a lot of money on the table has helped offset the bad Heyward and Darvish contracts.

3. Intangibles. Tony is this generation's Mr. Cub, the heartbeat if you will. I think the best execs are a bit ruthless, but I would make an exception with Rizzo. 44 needs to hang from the foul pole.

Regarding a Bryant extension, I want nothing to do with him in his 30's unless it's a team friendly discount (unlikely because Boras is the puppet master). This is yet another season of him failing to produce at 2016 levels and while he overall production is best on the team, I suspect that he will want too much. I'd be willing to pay him $25M through his age 34 year, not nothing more than that. His defense is already starting to regress, and his one truly elite skill (baserunning) will not age. Additionally, he has a unique inability to play through nagging injuries. I like Kris, but I imagine Boras will be looking for something that will pay him $30M+ through agre 37, and I'd want no part of that.

Contreras is the guy I would like to see them trade. Folks in this thread no longer argue that he is a good catcher because of adm strength and pop time. I'd like to get a really good defensive catcher and replace Willson's bat elsewhere on the diamond. I may be a bit biased as Contreras is the one Cubs player who I don't personally care for (I like passion, bit Willson is the spaz that we all played with in youth baseball).

I love Rizzo, but the trend right now in baseball is that guys are peaking earlier than they used to and can fall off more quickly in their 30s. I'm not sure Rizzo is a guy who holds up well past 32-34. First base is the easiest position in baseball to replace and Rizzo is 29. Trading his bat with his established track record with 2 more years of control at a very reasonable price would allow the Cubs to demand a really good haul.

The Cubs have had good teams in my lifetime. 1984. 1989, 2001-2004 was mostly good, 2007-2009. This time they really built a good team in 2015-2016, but the way you sustain success is by allowing the roster to refresh every few years around a constant core. Rizzo may be a guy that plays out his career in Chicago, but if there's a next window for the Cubs, I don't think Rizzo will be a critical piece. Looking at current roster, I'd centralize around Castellanos, Baez and KB to start and maybe the Cubs can use pieces like Rizzo, Contreras, Schwarber, Happ to work some deals to bring in some good young talent, particularly pitching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irwin Fletcher10
I love Rizzo, but the trend right now in baseball is that guys are peaking earlier than they used to and can fall off more quickly in their 30s. I'm not sure Rizzo is a guy who holds up well past 32-34. First base is the easiest position in baseball to replace and Rizzo is 29. Trading his bat with his established track record with 2 more years of control at a very reasonable price would allow the Cubs to demand a really good haul.

The Cubs have had good teams in my lifetime. 1984. 1989, 2001-2004 was mostly good, 2007-2009. This time they really built a good team in 2015-2016, but the way you sustain success is by allowing the roster to refresh every few years around a constant core. Rizzo may be a guy that plays out his career in Chicago, but if there's a next window for the Cubs, I don't think Rizzo will be a critical piece. Looking at current roster, I'd centralize around Castellanos, Baez and KB to start and maybe the Cubs can use pieces like Rizzo, Contreras, Schwarber, Happ to work some deals to bring in some good young talent, particularly pitching.
I honestly believe the intangibles Rizzo brings to the team outweigh his current trade value. I don't think you could bring in someone who has the offensive prowess AND locker room credentials that Rizzo has.

My preference would be to keep Baez, Bryant, Castellanos, and Rizzo. Trade Contreras, Schwarber, Happ, and see what can be done about Heyward. Heyward is not worth near what his contract would indicate.

Just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: your_master5
I honestly believe the intangibles Rizzo brings to the team outweigh his current trade value. I don't think you could bring in someone who has the offensive prowess AND locker room credentials that Rizzo has.

My preference would be to keep Baez, Bryant, Castellanos, and Rizzo. Trade Contreras, Schwarber, Happ, and see what can be done about Heyward. Heyward is not worth near what his contract would indicate.

Just my opinion.

I'm not going to be mad or anything if they keep Rizzo, but if they want to make a couple big moves to get younger, I think he's a guy that has a lot of value. Their best value guys are obviously Baez, Bryant, Rizzo, Contreras. You're almost certainly going to keep at least 2 of those guys as the core going forward. Happ has good prospect value currently. Schwarber isn't a lot on his own, but he's nice sweetener to coax more value out of a deal. Heyward is getting to the point where he's tradeable, but he's not a guy you're getting a good haul of young guys for, it might be a bad money swap where maybe the Cubs take another bad contract that's shorter in duration or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mstp1992
This season may very well be "the last go-round" of this era.

The Cubs roster is going to look a LOT different next year. Half the bullpen, Hamels, Zobrist, probably Castellanos and Morrow off the books, and some very painful arbitration may wipe a lot of that savings out. Maybe Darvish too.

Better hope you have lots of internal pitching options. From what I gather, 2020 FA pitching is scarce across the board in both quantity and quality - so the quality ain't gonna be cheap.
 
This season may very well be "the last go-round" of this era.

The Cubs roster is going to look a LOT different next year. Half the bullpen, Hamels, Zobrist, probably Castellanos and Morrow off the books, and some very painful arbitration may wipe a lot of that savings out. Maybe Darvish too.

Better hope you have lots of internal pitching options. From what I gather, 2020 FA pitching is scarce across the board in both quantity and quality - so the quality ain't gonna be cheap.

I tend to agree with this. I think this is when they need to transition to the next window. It doesn't need to be a new tanking or anything, but rather try to extend 1-2 of the core guys, shed several of the big contracts and maybe trade a couple guys. The Cubs do have some intriguing arms getting close, so hopefully they can stay healthy and continue to develop. Alzolay really needs to be able to slot in as the #5 next year.
 
This season may very well be "the last go-round" of this era.

The Cubs roster is going to look a LOT different next year. Half the bullpen, Hamels, Zobrist, probably Castellanos and Morrow off the books, and some very painful arbitration may wipe a lot of that savings out. Maybe Darvish too.

Better hope you have lots of internal pitching options. From what I gather, 2020 FA pitching is scarce across the board in both quantity and quality - so the quality ain't gonna be cheap.
Sign Castellanos to a long term deal and trade Bryant.
 
I was at Scheels today, and good luck finding anything with Baez name on it in anything other than small. Every bin with his shirts had a paltry selection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheCainer
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT