ADVERTISEMENT

*****Official Cubs 2023 thread*****

if we were getting 2017-2019 Bellinger I'd trilled, the 2020-2022 version isn't much better than Ian Happ
Why the Happ slander? Happ was an All Star.

Set your Bellinger expectations here: He plays a Gold Glove caliber CF, is a smart base runner and has some lefty pop. His average is likely to pop up a bit because of the shift going away. That’s the floor - a defensive CF with some power. That’s all I’m expecting.

There is some potential upside if the Cubs can work with him to fix some things and that’s upside that nobody else on the market as a defensive CF has. That he also plays 1B is a bonus, too. It’s a great hedge. $12M against the 2023 payroll and then a $5.5M mutual option for 2024 that nobody is going to take. If Bellinger is great, he won’t take it and if he’s not the Cubs certainly won’t. So they get him for $17.5M total and offset some of the pay to 2024. There’s literally no downside to this deal unless his D sucks and that’s basically never happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkRugged17
It doesn’t seem like $17M is going to stop the Cubs from making other moves, so I‘d be curious as to your reasons. 1 year blocks nobody and his $17M is gone after this year. Well, technically $12M this year and $5.5M next year, but either way it doesn’t move the needle on a $230M+ team payroll.
I like his defense, but that's about it. One of the podcasts I listen to mentioned that players with similar injuries as his had not typically bounced back with as much power. Plus, with no allegiance to the Cubs, he's on a prove-it deal and there are no ties, other than money, that would keep him here long-term. Let's play this out...he has a good year, the Cubs don't make the playoffs and he leaves, what was the point? So basically, he's this year's Simmons or Villar or Frazier just with a higher price tag. Like I said, I hope I am wrong and that he returns to MVP form and signs a long-term deal with the Cubs, but I'm not optimistic.
 
Last edited:
Well...time to cheer against Contreras. Was one of my favorite players.
And this is why I'll never buy player jerseys or tshirts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QChawks
Why the Happ slander? Happ was an All Star.

Set your Bellinger expectations here: He plays a Gold Glove caliber CF, is a smart base runner and has some lefty pop. His average is likely to pop up a bit because of the shift going away. That’s the floor - a defensive CF with some power. That’s all I’m expecting.

There is some potential upside if the Cubs can work with him to fix some things and that’s upside that nobody else on the market as a defensive CF has. That he also plays 1B is a bonus, too. It’s a great hedge. $12M against the 2023 payroll and then a $5.5M mutual option for 2024 that nobody is going to take. If Bellinger is great, he won’t take it and if he’s not the Cubs certainly won’t. So they get him for $17.5M total and offset some of the pay to 2024. There’s literally no downside to this deal unless his D sucks and that’s basically never happened.
it's not a Happ slander, it's that I don't think Bellinger is worth $17M for a guy that hit .210 last year

he's basically a Happ-clone without the batting average
 
F*cking Cardinals....like Nolan, of all the teams he could end up with I had the feeling he'd end up in that shit town. Ugh
 
  • Love
Reactions: fredjr82
it's not a Happ slander, it's that I don't think Bellinger is worth $17M for a guy that hit .210 last year

he's basically a Happ-clone without the batting average
Happ has never been anywhere close to an mvp. It's only 1 year
 
Crazy, but the Cubs got Taillon for less - 4/$68M. I love this pickup at that price. Taillon’s floor is a solid 3 who can eat innings, but if the Cubs can up the spin on his slider, there’s a lot to like here. Not sure I see an ace, but I think I see a guy who could be a solid/good #2.

Most importantly, this is more evidence for the SS on the market that the Cubs are serious about improving the roster and winning.

Bellinger alone was a C/C+ move
Taillon alone is a B move
Dansby Swanson alone is a B+/A- move
Xander Bogaerts alone is an A move
Dansby+Xander is an A+ move
As a NYY fan, Taillon isn't a #2/#3 SP, even in the NL Central.

Sorry, just isn't for an entire season. You get 4/5 innings before he walks guys.
 
I like his defense, but that's about it. One of the podcasts I listen to mentioned that players with similar injuries as his had not typically bounced back with as much power. Plus, with no allegiance to the Cubs, he's on a prove-it deal and there are no ties, other than money, that would keep him here long-term. Let's play this out...he has a good year, the Cubs don't make the playoffs and he leaves, what was the point? So basically, he's this year's Simmons or Villar or Frazier just with a higher price tag. Like I said, I hope I am wrong and that he returns to MVP form and signs a long-term deal with the Cubs, but I'm not optimistic.
The point is that he’s an upgrade over what the Cubs put out in CF last year and he’s a bridge to the young OFs. Brennan Davis may push for playing time this year and take the job from Bellinger if he doesn’t hit. PCA might be ready in 2024. Canario should be healthy at some point this summer. They just need a guy to get us through this year with the youth and injury questions.
 
Just the eye test.

He lost a playoff game and struggled, mightily after the ASG.
You must have just tuned in for his walks. He walked 32 guys in 177 innings. He slumped a little in the middle of the season, but he was strong after August. When you do his first half/second half splits, he’s pretty consistent. He had a hot start and a strong finish and struggled a little in the middle. He did not struggle mightily through the 2nd half.

 
  • Like
Reactions: SWIowahawks
You must have just tuned in for his walks. He walked 32 guys in 177 innings. He slumped a little in the middle of the season, but he was strong after August. When you do his first half/second half splits, he’s pretty consistent. He had a hot start and a strong finish and struggled a little in the middle. He did not struggle mightily through the 2nd half.

He was the #4, at best, starter at year's end.
He could pitch hitless ball for 4 innings and not get an out in the 5th.
The beat writers for the team said there was absolutely no interest in resigning him.

But he may very well win 8-10 games next season.
 
He was the #4, at best, starter at year's end.
He could pitch hitless ball for 4 innings and not get an out in the 5th.
The beat writers for the team said there was absolutely no interest in resigning him.

But he may very well win 8-10 games next season.
We’ll see how it goes. Cubs saw something they liked and they’ve done a really good job in the the pitching department in recent years. He probably lines up as the 3/4, depending on whether the Cubs get Senga and where Wesneski slots. I could see Stroman, Steele, Taillon, Wesneski and Hendricks, if he’s healthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MitchLL
The point is that he’s an upgrade over what the Cubs put out in CF last year and he’s a bridge to the young OFs. Brennan Davis may push for playing time this year and take the job from Bellinger if he doesn’t hit. PCA might be ready in 2024. Canario should be healthy at some point this summer. They just need a guy to get us through this year with the youth and injury questions.
I understand the thinking behind signing him but I don’t necessarily agree with signing him personally. I would just be really happy if they could flip him at the deadline.
 
I understand the thinking behind signing him but I don’t necessarily agree with signing him personally. I would just be really happy if they could flip him at the deadline.
I’m have full expectations that this team will be in the race at the deadline and not be flipping guys anymore.
 
I understand the thinking behind signing him but I don’t necessarily agree with signing him personally. I would just be really happy if they could flip him at the deadline.
You'll be happy if the Cubs are sellers at the deadline? K
 
I’m curious about Bogaerts. When the Red Sox jumped back in all signs pointed to them re-signing him and things went silent like they often do before a deal is announced. Then, several hours later as everyone was leaving San Diego, reports were out that several teams were still in play for Xander. I have to wonder if the Red Sox didn’t get him today, are they out?

I think all 3 SS are still in play. I also heard from a friend who follows the Braves obsessively that Dansby turned down 6/$140M, so that probably gives an idea where he wants to be. I think 6/$160-ish might get the deal done. $27M AAV gets to $162M and matches Trea’s AAV for half the length. That might get it done. Also still seeing that Cubs are in deep with Correa, but the Giants are also trying to get in.
 
Love your optimism and I hope you’re right.
My optimism is 100% based on what I think the Cubs will do with the roster. If the Cubs literally do not make another move, I’ll still have to line everything up and look at the rest of the league, but they’ll be out of the playoffs unless you get huge organic growth from Seiya, Hoerner, Mervis and Morel plus amazing pitching. When the offseason is done, if there’s reason for hate, I’ll be jumping in with 2 feet. I’m just not there yet because I think they’ll get things done.
 
Probably why his agent pumped the Cubs and Red Sox rumors.
To a point. But now I realize I should have been paying more attention. The Padres tried to jump the Turner and Judge deals at the last minute with huge offers, but Trea wanted East Coast and Judge stayed in NY. Bogaerts is the guy they flipped.

Whale Vagina is playing a different game right now. We’ll see if it pays off.
 
Til age 41. Insane
I’ve been thinking about this and there’s definitely a counter move here. Teams have been looking at shorter, high AAV deals, but some of those deals this week are playing up years at the expense of AAV. Trea Turner got 11 years, but $27M AAV. I figure’d he’d be a little lower overall, but flipped - higher AAV, but fewer years. Bogaerts AAV is $25.4 AAV.

Is this just a crazy year or are teams thinking that it’s beneficial to pay a star now a lower AAV and extend him a long time vs. burning the next 2-3 budget cycles with high AAV that reduces short-term flexibility? That Bogaerts deal looks bad in year 7, but at that point, how big a deal is a $25.4 AAV? Might not be a big deal to move on from.
 
Teams have different motivations. I heard Buster Olney say no more than six hours ago that the Padres were getting one of the three SS no matter what. He didn’t know which one, but the owner wasn’t going to be outbid. The Padres want to win right now. The Red Sox aren’t in that win-at-all-costs mode. Their deals with Jansen and the OF from Japan gives them organizational flexibility while the Padres are taking a much different approach.

So, this will be fun to watch the Cubs, Giants, Twins, Red Sox and Braves go after Correa and Swanson.
 
Last edited:
Crazy contracts.

We'll soon find out just how much the Cubs are willing to spend.

It's not looking good at this point, because all these FAs are going to teams that want to win right now. Cubs can offer the $$$, but not the competitiveness. Outside of DeGrom, and that's a short deal.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT